24.11.2012 Views

The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore

The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore

The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In Figure 3.5 to Figure 3.8, the maximum tensile<br />

force due to p<strong>in</strong>ch effect is the same magnitude<br />

or lower than the tensile force dur<strong>in</strong>g sw<strong>in</strong>g-out<br />

<strong>of</strong> the bus. This <strong>in</strong>dicates that the bundle<br />

conductors clash effectively. <strong>The</strong> ratio λ is<br />

greater than about 25 accord<strong>in</strong>g to equations<br />

(*43) and (*44) <strong>in</strong> [Ref 1, Ref 2, Ref 3] which<br />

result from tests e. g. cases 1 and 3. Ratios λ less<br />

than 25 should be avoided, Figure 3.9 to Figure<br />

3.11.<br />

In the case shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.11, common for<br />

overhead l<strong>in</strong>es, the p<strong>in</strong>ch can depend<br />

significantly on the ratios mentioned above. <strong>The</strong><br />

transient after the <strong>short</strong>-<strong>circuit</strong> ends is typical <strong>of</strong><br />

wave propagation along the subspan. This<br />

phenomenon can be observed on the<br />

accompany<strong>in</strong>g video.<br />

Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the geometry, similar <strong>short</strong>-<strong>circuit</strong><br />

have very different design loads. A structure will<br />

not behave <strong>in</strong> a similar way if the load shape is<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g from Figure 3.1 to Figure 3.11, even if the<br />

maximum <strong>in</strong>stantaneous peak would be similar<br />

<strong>in</strong> all cases.<br />

3.2.2. Application <strong>of</strong> advanced method on high<br />

voltage busbar system<br />

Figure 3.12 shows the complete test arrangement<br />

consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> two <strong>mechanical</strong>ly coupled spans<br />

which is modeled us<strong>in</strong>g F<strong>in</strong>ite Element Method<br />

(FE).<br />

<strong>The</strong> lattice type steel towers and cross arms are<br />

welded constructions <strong>of</strong> T and L cross-sections.<br />

<strong>The</strong> mid portal has more stiffness, as it is<br />

movable.<br />

Figure 3.12 FE modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the busbar system with force<br />

measur<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts K1, K2, K3, K4.<br />

To stabilize this type <strong>of</strong> construction, the towers<br />

need larger bottom part. Towers are 18m high,<br />

portals 18m wide, cross arms are at ca.10m<br />

height and the spans are 37.35m (South) and<br />

27.40m (North). Phase distance <strong>of</strong> the conductors<br />

1 x AC SR 537/53 is 1.84m.<br />

<strong>The</strong> suspensions consist <strong>of</strong> 8-element cha<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong><br />

glass or cap- and-p<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>sulators.<br />

<strong>The</strong> components <strong>of</strong> the studied busbar system<br />

represent an assembly. For the FE model, see<br />

Figure 3.12 , this assembly is transformed <strong>in</strong>to a<br />

39<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ite number <strong>of</strong> such f<strong>in</strong>ite element types that are<br />

best suited for modell<strong>in</strong>g the structural parts <strong>in</strong><br />

question. <strong>The</strong> discrete elements <strong>of</strong> the system are<br />

connected by nodes.<br />

For modell<strong>in</strong>g the substation, element types from the<br />

element library <strong>of</strong> the FE-programm ABAQUS [Ref<br />

33] were used [Ref 40].<br />

<strong>The</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> any modell<strong>in</strong>g is to achieve a quality <strong>of</strong><br />

the FE model so the deviations between calculation<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g the model and the behaviour <strong>of</strong> the real<br />

arrangement become negligible. To test and verify<br />

the adequacy <strong>of</strong> the FE model <strong>of</strong> the portal structures<br />

the follow<strong>in</strong>g comparative FE calculations were<br />

performed [Ref 49].<br />

Bend<strong>in</strong>g stiffness <strong>of</strong> the component towers and<br />

crossarms, as well as <strong>of</strong> the complete portals is one<br />

important parameter to characterise the <strong>mechanical</strong><br />

properties. <strong>The</strong> respective FE calculated<br />

characteristic must be <strong>in</strong> conformity with those <strong>of</strong><br />

the real arrangement. <strong>The</strong> 7 step unidirectional test<br />

cycles <strong>of</strong> two identical static loads applied at the<br />

conductor suspension po<strong>in</strong>ts had shown a practically<br />

l<strong>in</strong>ear characteristic without hysteresis, so that<br />

stiffness can be expressed <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> a spr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

constant [Ref 34]. Field tests performed by the<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the WG 121.2 <strong>of</strong> the German<br />

Electrotechnical Commission DKE on a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

portals have come to the same result.<br />

<strong>The</strong> respective calculations therefore need only one<br />

check for one convenient value <strong>of</strong> the loads and<br />

under exact validity <strong>of</strong> Hook's law.<br />

<strong>The</strong> calculated and the measured spr<strong>in</strong>g constants<br />

are graphically compared <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.13 .<strong>The</strong><br />

achieved conformity for South/North portals <strong>of</strong><br />

lesser stiffness is excellent and it is very good for the<br />

mid portal.<br />

Figure 3.13 Comparison <strong>of</strong> calculated and measured spr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

constants<br />

For the dynamic studies on the model, the first, the<br />

second, and the third eigenfrequencies should be the<br />

same as those <strong>of</strong> the real arrangement. From<br />

measurement only the first modes <strong>of</strong> the crossarms<br />

and <strong>of</strong> the towers are known. While the calculation<br />

<strong>of</strong> higher modes is easy, measurement is extremely<br />

complicated for large <strong>mechanical</strong> structures and may<br />

be, if at all, only available for components. <strong>The</strong><br />

conformity <strong>of</strong> the first modes is a very strong criteria<br />

for good modell<strong>in</strong>g.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!