The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore
The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore
The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5.2.2. A global Approach<br />
For analyz<strong>in</strong>g exist<strong>in</strong>g structures, RTE proposes a<br />
two-step approach:<br />
Step 1: Check us<strong>in</strong>g the local determ<strong>in</strong>istic values <strong>of</strong><br />
the <strong>short</strong>-<strong>circuit</strong> current, the time constant and the<br />
clearance time, tak<strong>in</strong>g the safety factors <strong>in</strong>to account.<br />
Step 2: Check us<strong>in</strong>g the probabilistic values <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>short</strong>-<strong>circuit</strong> current <strong>in</strong>tensity, the voltage phases<br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g caused the fault, and possibly the w<strong>in</strong>d<br />
velocity concomitant with the occurrence <strong>of</strong> the fault<br />
and the direction <strong>of</strong> the w<strong>in</strong>d (<strong>in</strong> this case, the<br />
prevail<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>d may be taken as perpendicular to the<br />
busbars).<br />
Negative<br />
verification<br />
Verification by<br />
probabilistic<br />
approach<br />
Calculation <strong>of</strong><br />
the risk <strong>of</strong><br />
collapse<br />
Check<strong>in</strong>g<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st the local<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>istic<br />
values, tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the safety<br />
factors <strong>in</strong>to<br />
account<br />
Step 2<br />
Positive<br />
verification<br />
End <strong>of</strong> the<br />
verification<br />
This type <strong>of</strong> approach has been developed below for<br />
rigid busbar only.<br />
5.2.3. A Calculation Method<br />
Step 1<br />
Given the choice <strong>of</strong> possible approaches, it is best to<br />
take <strong>in</strong>to account either the design situation which, if<br />
well chosen, corresponds to a penaliz<strong>in</strong>g situation, or<br />
a more detailed method, described <strong>in</strong> 5.2.3.1.4. This<br />
section is not <strong>in</strong>tended to def<strong>in</strong>e that situation<br />
specifically for each company and accord<strong>in</strong>g to local<br />
particularities, but rather to outl<strong>in</strong>e the ma<strong>in</strong> steps <strong>in</strong><br />
an approach that may be broken down as follows:<br />
80<br />
Def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> the P.D.F. for the primary variables<br />
Def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> the parameters characteriz<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>mechanical</strong> loads<br />
Calculation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>mechanical</strong> loads distribution<br />
Def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> the C.D.F. for the <strong>mechanical</strong> strength variables<br />
Calculation <strong>of</strong> the risk <strong>of</strong> collapse as a function <strong>of</strong> Gamma 7.4<br />
Def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> occurences <strong>of</strong> stress-generat<strong>in</strong>g faults<br />
Def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> loaded elements<br />
Calculation <strong>of</strong> the failure recurrence time