The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore
The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore
The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
From prior tests the stiffness values are known to be SN<br />
= 1.086 kN/mm, SM = 1.223 kN/mm (Sres = 0.575<br />
kN/mm).<br />
<strong>The</strong> relevant first eigenfrequencies excited at the<br />
mounted mid crossarm, i.e. next to the suspension<br />
po<strong>in</strong>ts, are 9 Hz for the N-portal crossarm and 9.5 Hz<br />
for the M-portal crossarm, while the complete portals<br />
have fundamental frequencies <strong>of</strong> 3 Hz and 4.3 Hz,<br />
respectively. It should be noted that the M-portal stiffer<br />
than the N-portal.<br />
Figure 3.42 Ma<strong>in</strong> conductor tensile forces, schematic oscillgraph<br />
0- Static load Fst<br />
1- Contraction maximum Fpi<br />
2- Sw<strong>in</strong>g-out maximum Ft<br />
3- Fall-<strong>of</strong>-span Maximum Ff<br />
<strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> the calculations performed on the<br />
structure model <strong>of</strong> Figure 3.41 are given <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
[Ref 46].<br />
Figure 3.43 and Figure 3.44 give an example <strong>of</strong> the<br />
reactions <strong>of</strong> the support structure upon the <strong>short</strong>-<strong>circuit</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> 100 kA – 40 kArms – 0.3 s on the 400 mm bundle<br />
phase conductors with 1 spacer. <strong>The</strong> comparison <strong>of</strong> a)<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st b) shows clearly the relative reduction <strong>of</strong> the fast<br />
events – the contraction and the 50 and 100 Hz phenomena<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>short</strong> <strong>circuit</strong>. – on the way from the<br />
dead-end fix<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t at the crossarm to the bottom end<br />
<strong>of</strong> the tower (i.e. foundation).<br />
Force<br />
[kN] 80.0<br />
60.0<br />
40.0<br />
20.0<br />
0<br />
0.0 0.4 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0<br />
time [s]<br />
Figure 3.43 Exemplary oscillographs <strong>of</strong> stresses at dead end<br />
55<br />
Force<br />
[103 0.2<br />
kN]<br />
0<br />
-0.2<br />
-0.4<br />
-0.6<br />
0.0 0.4 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0<br />
time [s]<br />
Figure 3.44 Exemplary oscillographs <strong>of</strong> stresses at foundation<br />
Figure 3.45 and Figure 3.46 exemplarily show the<br />
calculated displacements <strong>of</strong> a bundle conductor for the<br />
same arrangement and <strong>short</strong>-<strong>circuit</strong> data as above except<br />
tK=0.1 s at the spacer location and at 1/4 span.<br />
Figure 3.45 Bundle conductor displacement at midspan (position <strong>of</strong><br />
spacer)<br />
Figure 3.46 Bundle conductor displacement at 1/4 span (<strong>in</strong> a location<br />
without spacer)<br />
<strong>The</strong> first sequence <strong>of</strong> figures - Figure 3.47 a, b and c -<br />
gives a collection <strong>of</strong> the calculation results for the<br />
respective tension forces at the dead end <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />
recorded maxima Fpi, Ft and Ff for the variants taken