The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore
The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore
The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
movement <strong>of</strong> the dropper (sw<strong>in</strong>g out and fall<strong>in</strong>g down)<br />
were much more a sw<strong>in</strong>g with limited fall<strong>in</strong>g down.<br />
We must consider different maxima, the maximum <strong>of</strong><br />
which will be Fds. Simplified methods are given <strong>in</strong><br />
paragraph 3.3.4.<br />
b) Droppers with flexible upper ends (configurations 3<br />
to 6)<br />
Droppers <strong>in</strong> or near the middle <strong>of</strong> the span as case B <strong>in</strong><br />
Figure 1.1 have flexible upper ends. <strong>The</strong> <strong>short</strong>-<strong>circuit</strong><br />
current can flow through the whole span and the<br />
dropper is without current, current path B <strong>in</strong> Figure<br />
3.22, or through half the span and then through the<br />
dropper, current path C. With path B the dropper<br />
behaviour is only affected by the movement <strong>of</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong><br />
bus, whereas with path C additional loads due to the<br />
electromagnetic forces between the droppers arise and<br />
due to p<strong>in</strong>ch effect <strong>in</strong> bundled conductors. Current path<br />
A is the reference arrangement without dropper.<br />
Figure 3.22 Current paths<br />
A without dropper<br />
B, C with dropper<br />
Tests with droppers <strong>in</strong> midspan are described <strong>in</strong> test<br />
cases *6, *7, 4 and 5 and also <strong>in</strong> [Ref 39].<br />
<strong>The</strong> first po<strong>in</strong>t to develop is to determ<strong>in</strong>e if the dropper<br />
will be stretched or not. Advanced method is used to<br />
study the structure behaviour. Simplified method can be<br />
used to evaluate the horizontal movement <strong>of</strong> the busbars<br />
and then to calculate the maximum distance from<br />
the attachment po<strong>in</strong>ts (bus and support) and compare it<br />
to the dropper length as derived <strong>in</strong> section 3.3.4a). If<br />
dropper length is unknown you will always assume a<br />
stretch.<br />
Configuration 3: non stretched s<strong>in</strong>gle conductor.<br />
This case has not to be considered for design if the<br />
current path is B, see Figure 3.23; other load<strong>in</strong>g will be<br />
more important (w<strong>in</strong>d speed). With current path C, a<br />
significant force at the lower end <strong>of</strong> the dropper has to<br />
be taken <strong>in</strong>to consideration, Figure 3.24 due to the<br />
forces <strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong> the droppers by the <strong>currents</strong> <strong>in</strong> the<br />
phases. In the ma<strong>in</strong> bus, maximum horizontal<br />
displacement and tensile forces caused by sw<strong>in</strong>g-out<br />
and fall <strong>of</strong> span are similar to those known from spans<br />
without droppers, but lower values with current path C<br />
than with current path B, see Figure 3.34.<br />
43<br />
Figure 3.23 Droppers not stretched, current path B: horizontal and<br />
vertical forces at the top <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>sulator; case 5, <strong>of</strong> the<br />
volume 2 Figure 7.1<br />
Figure 3.24 Droppers not stretched, current path C: horizontal and<br />
vertical forces at the top <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>sulator; case 5, <strong>of</strong> the<br />
volume 2 Figure 7.2<br />
Configuration 4: non stretched bundle conductor.<br />
With current path B this case needs no consideration <strong>in</strong><br />
design. With current path C, the p<strong>in</strong>ch effect is <strong>in</strong><br />
addition to the <strong>effects</strong> between phases <strong>in</strong> case 3. <strong>The</strong><br />
p<strong>in</strong>ch effect can be evaluated follow<strong>in</strong>g IEC/EN 60865-<br />
1 and then transferred to filter for ESL, see paragraph<br />
6.3. <strong>The</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> bus behaviour is the same as <strong>in</strong><br />
configuration 3.<br />
It should be noticed, that a non stretched dropper also<br />
has an <strong>in</strong>fluence on the movement <strong>of</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> bus<br />
which is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.34.<br />
Configuration 5: stretched s<strong>in</strong>gle conductor.<br />
This is an important configuration observed <strong>in</strong> data<br />
reference tests (tests *6, *7, 4 and 5 and [Ref 39]).<br />
Some typical dropper stretch are studied <strong>in</strong> annex 8.1.<br />
Applied load on structures can overpass 20 kN. <strong>The</strong><br />
load is a typical impulse load, maxima occur dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
stretch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the dropper, due to the movement <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ma<strong>in</strong> busbar. <strong>The</strong> impulse come back with a frequency<br />
connected to the ma<strong>in</strong> busbar sw<strong>in</strong>g frequency. Impulse<br />
duration is about 0,1 s and depends on the dropper<br />
length. <strong>The</strong> sw<strong>in</strong>g-out <strong>of</strong> the busbar is h<strong>in</strong>dered, the<br />
sw<strong>in</strong>g-out tensile force is nearly the same as that<br />
without dropper, but the appearance <strong>of</strong> a fall <strong>of</strong> span<br />
depends on the dropper length, see Figure 3.35. In<br />
addition with current path C, the forces at the lower<br />
ends <strong>of</strong> the droppers are to be m<strong>in</strong>ded.