24.11.2012 Views

The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore

The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore

The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.2. SECOND LEVEL PROBABILISTIC<br />

METHOD<br />

5.2.1. Stress and strength relationship for<br />

support<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sulators<br />

5.2.1.1 Static and dynamic break-load<br />

In many cases post <strong>in</strong>sulators are mounted <strong>in</strong><br />

disconnectors. <strong>The</strong> permissible (tensile-) load for the<br />

disconnector depends on the m<strong>in</strong>imum break<strong>in</strong>g load<br />

<strong>of</strong> the post <strong>in</strong>sulator. Post <strong>in</strong>sulators can be stressed<br />

by static and/or dynamic loads. In the normal case it<br />

is a bend<strong>in</strong>g stress. Usually, ceramic materials are<br />

<strong>in</strong>flexible and differences between static and dynamic<br />

strength are not known [Ref 94]. Experimental [Ref<br />

95] and theoretical [Ref 96] <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>of</strong> 110 kV<br />

post <strong>in</strong>sulators under <strong>short</strong>-<strong>circuit</strong> load<strong>in</strong>g have not<br />

shown any significant differences between static and<br />

dynamic porcela<strong>in</strong> strength. For that reason it is<br />

possible to convert the maximum stress at a specific<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> the porcela<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> a <strong>short</strong>-<strong>circuit</strong><br />

(i.e. measured as stra<strong>in</strong> εdyn on the surface <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>in</strong>sulator core over the lowest shed) to an equivalent<br />

static load F max which generates the same stress at the<br />

same po<strong>in</strong>t. This load can be compared with the<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum break<strong>in</strong>g load.<br />

Figure 5.3 Current-conduct<strong>in</strong>g-equipment with conductor, post<br />

<strong>in</strong>sulator and foundation (scheme)<br />

5.2.1.2 One po<strong>in</strong>t distribution <strong>of</strong> strength<br />

From a statistical po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view, the m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

break<strong>in</strong>g load fixed by the manufacturer could be<br />

considered as a one po<strong>in</strong>t distribution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>mechanical</strong> strength <strong>of</strong> post-<strong>in</strong>sulators.<br />

This would mean that each post <strong>in</strong>sulator withstands a<br />

load lower than the m<strong>in</strong>imum break<strong>in</strong>g load. If the<br />

load is higher than the m<strong>in</strong>imum break<strong>in</strong>g load all<br />

post <strong>in</strong>sulators would be damaged. This approach<br />

does not, correspond with reality. <strong>The</strong> strength <strong>of</strong> post<br />

77<br />

<strong>in</strong>sulators is distributed statistically as a result <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fact that the strength <strong>of</strong> a ceramic body is statistically<br />

distributed, due to differences <strong>in</strong> the structure <strong>in</strong>side<br />

the ceramic body [Ref 97]. In most cases the real<br />

bend<strong>in</strong>g strengths <strong>of</strong> post-<strong>in</strong>sulators are higher than<br />

the m<strong>in</strong>imum break<strong>in</strong>g load. But it is possible that<br />

some post <strong>in</strong>sulators are damaged by loads lower than<br />

the m<strong>in</strong>imum break<strong>in</strong>g load. Exact knowledge <strong>of</strong> the<br />

strength distribution function is necessary (especially<br />

for little quantils <strong>of</strong> strength) for determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>mechanical</strong> reliability <strong>of</strong> a post-<strong>in</strong>sulator.<br />

5.2.1.3 Strength distribution function <strong>of</strong> 110 kV post<br />

<strong>in</strong>sulators<br />

111 ruptures <strong>of</strong> post <strong>in</strong>sulators with a m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

break<strong>in</strong>g load <strong>of</strong> 8kN were evaluated for<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> the strength distribution function <strong>of</strong><br />

brand-new post <strong>in</strong>sulators. <strong>The</strong> statistical evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> these test results showed three break value ranges<br />

(Figure 5.4) :<br />

1. ruptures due to loads up to 10 kN<br />

2. ruptures due to loads between 10 kN and 20 kN<br />

3. ruptures due to loads greater than 20 kN which<br />

can be approximated by a double exponential<br />

distribution.<br />

Figure 5.4 Distribution-function <strong>of</strong> <strong>mechanical</strong> strength <strong>of</strong> 110kV-post<br />

<strong>in</strong>sulators with different m<strong>in</strong>imum break<strong>in</strong>g<br />

load Fum<strong>in</strong> and age (courtesy ABB, Pr. Böhme)<br />

<strong>The</strong> same procedure is valid for 25-year-old post<br />

<strong>in</strong>sulators with a m<strong>in</strong>imum break<strong>in</strong>g load <strong>of</strong> 6 kN. To<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e the distribution function <strong>of</strong> this type, 21<br />

post <strong>in</strong>sulators were tested to failure. <strong>The</strong> theoretical<br />

distribution function is also a double exponential<br />

distribution with the follow<strong>in</strong>g break value ranges :<br />

1. ruptures due to loads up to 7,5 kN<br />

2. ruptures due to loads between 7,5kN and 11 kN<br />

3. ruptures due to loads greater than 11 kN.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!