24.11.2012 Views

The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore

The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore

The mechanical effects of short-circuit currents in - Montefiore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Typical examples are the conductors shown <strong>in</strong> Figure<br />

2.11a. At one end a flexible connection to another<br />

equipment can be fastened, or <strong>in</strong> the span there could be<br />

an additional mass, e.g. the contact <strong>of</strong> a disconnector.<br />

For the cantilever ends and the drawn k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> supports,<br />

the factor γ lies between the specified limits; the value<br />

to be taken depends on the lengths <strong>of</strong> the cantilever end<br />

and the freedom <strong>of</strong> movement <strong>of</strong> that end. In the case <strong>of</strong><br />

the additional mass <strong>in</strong> the span, the frequency can be<br />

calculated with the factor cm stated above. Alternatively,<br />

<strong>in</strong> all cases the relevant natural frequency can be<br />

estimated accord<strong>in</strong>g to the equation (2.38) from the<br />

maximum displacement max y due to dead load:<br />

(2.46)<br />

f<br />

c<br />

=<br />

=<br />

1<br />

2π<br />

1<br />

2π<br />

cF<br />

≈<br />

m<br />

F<br />

mg<br />

n<br />

1<br />

2π<br />

gn<br />

=<br />

max y<br />

1 F<br />

m max y<br />

1<br />

2π<br />

gn<br />

max y<br />

where cF is the spr<strong>in</strong>g coefficient, m the overall mass, F<br />

the dead load due to m and gn = 9,81 m/s 2 the<br />

acceleration <strong>of</strong> gravity. From this the numerical<br />

equation follows which is given <strong>in</strong> Figure 2.11.<br />

More complicated connections, e.g. swan-neck bends<br />

between different levels <strong>in</strong> Figure 2.11b, can be<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigated with sufficient accuracy. Lets assume that<br />

the sides have equal lengths and are full stiff aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

torsion; <strong>in</strong> this case the static l<strong>in</strong>e perpendicular to the<br />

conductor plane for ϕ = 180°, i.e. straight beam both<br />

ends fixed, fits also for 90° ≤ ϕ < 180°, the frequency is<br />

correct. <strong>The</strong> other extreme is no stiffness aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

torsion, the sides will sag like cantilever beams for ϕ =<br />

90°; the frequency will be reduced to 63 % compared<br />

with the ideal stiff conductor. Both limits are used <strong>in</strong><br />

substations: Tubes <strong>in</strong> HV-substations are stiff whereas<br />

rectangular pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>in</strong> MV- LV-substations are not stiff.<br />

For frequency-estimation, tubes can be ‘straightened’<br />

and good results can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed after reduction <strong>of</strong> 5 %<br />

to 15 % depend<strong>in</strong>g on the length <strong>of</strong> the sides .<br />

24<br />

a)<br />

b)<br />

clamp, cabel<br />

flexible jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

mass <strong>of</strong> disconnector-contact<br />

A<br />

B<br />

ϕ<br />

max y<br />

1,57 < γ < 2,46<br />

2,46 < γ < 3,56<br />

alternatively:<br />

fc 5<br />

≈<br />

Hz max y<br />

cm<br />

sectional view AB:<br />

displacements<br />

Figure 2.11 Estimation <strong>of</strong> relevant frequency<br />

a) Cantilever beam and beam with<br />

additional masses<br />

b) swan-neck bend<br />

2.2.5. Section moduli <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> and sub-conductors<br />

<strong>The</strong> stresses σm and σs accord<strong>in</strong>g to equations (2.5) and<br />

(2.6) depend on the section moduli Zm <strong>of</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

conductor and Zs <strong>of</strong> the sub-conductor. For Zm it is to<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>guish whether the ma<strong>in</strong> conductor is a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

conductor, or consists <strong>of</strong> two or more sub-conductors<br />

with rectangular pr<strong>of</strong>ile or <strong>of</strong> two sub-conductors with<br />

U-pr<strong>of</strong>ile. If the ma<strong>in</strong> conductor is made up <strong>of</strong> subconductors,<br />

there can be either no connect<strong>in</strong>g piece or<br />

the connect<strong>in</strong>g pieces act as spacers or as stiffen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

elements. In addition, the direction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

electromagnetic force is important.<br />

For calculation <strong>of</strong> section moduli the distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

bend<strong>in</strong>g stresses has to be taken <strong>in</strong>to account. Axial<br />

forces do not occur, the conductors are assumed to<br />

move free <strong>in</strong> the clamps.<br />

2.2.5.1 Section modulus <strong>of</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle conductor<br />

Figure 2.12a shows a s<strong>in</strong>gle conductor, for example<br />

with rectangular cross section Am. <strong>The</strong> vector m Mr is the<br />

outer moment caused by the force Fm on the ma<strong>in</strong><br />

conductor. It lies <strong>in</strong> the centre Sm and makes<br />

compressive stress above the neutral fibre O-O and<br />

tensile stress below. <strong>The</strong> maximum stress σm <strong>in</strong> the<br />

outer fibres at ±dm/2 follows from equation (2.25)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!