<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaChapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaTHE ROLE OF SPARTINA ANGLICA PRODUCTION IN BIVALVE DIETS IN NORTHERNPUGET SOUND, WA, USAC.E. HELLQUIST 1 AND R.A. BLACKSchool <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Biological Sciences, Washingt<strong>on</strong> State University, Pullman, WA 991641 Current address: Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Biological Sciences, State University <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> New York, Oswego, NY 13126;eric.hellquist@oswego.eduThe importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> salt marsh productivity to coastal food webs is a questi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ecological andec<strong>on</strong>omic importance. In nor<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn Puget Sound, Washingt<strong>on</strong>, USA, a relatively new source <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>producti<strong>on</strong> has become prominent with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> establishment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> invasive Spartina anglica (Poaceae:English cordgrass). Spartina anglica has c<strong>on</strong>verted native coastal mudflat communities that hadlittle or no emergent vascular vegetati<strong>on</strong> into expansive cordgrass meadows. One c<strong>on</strong>sequence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>Spartina productivity <strong>on</strong> invaded mudflats may be altered trophic patterns. Three bivalves withdifferent feeding modes (Macoma balthica, Mya arenaria, and Mytilus sp.) that are comm<strong>on</strong>lyfound at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> edges <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartina meadows were selected to investigate whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r Spartina isc<strong>on</strong>tributing to bivalve diets. We compared <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> stable isotope ratios (δ 13 C and δ 34 S) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> bivalvesto potential food sources including macroalgae, Spartina, and o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r vascular plants. We estimated<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> feasible c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> producti<strong>on</strong> to bivalve diets during March 2003 by analyzing <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> results<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> multiple source, mass-balanced linear mixing models as calculated by IsoSource. Our estimatesindicate that Spartina biomass may comprise 37-60% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> diet <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Macoma, while dead Spartinabiomass c<strong>on</strong>tributes 0-46%. For Mya arenaria a filter-feeding clam, 40-59% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its diet may c<strong>on</strong>tainSpartina biomass, while 0-35% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its diet may c<strong>on</strong>sist <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> dead Spartina biomass. Mytilus sp., afilter-feeding mussel, had 19-44% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its diet originating from Spartina biomass while dead Spartinamay be 0-46% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its diet. Spartina c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> by bivalves is c<strong>on</strong>sistent with previous isotopicstudies. Although Spartina biomass is c<strong>on</strong>sidered recalcitrant, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> immediate proximity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>c<strong>on</strong>sumers to vast quantities <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartina productivity may best explain <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> prevalence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartina inbivalve diets while o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r potential sources have minor estimated c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>s. This study providesan initial examinati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> how <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> biomass <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an invasive plant species is becoming integrated intoestuarine trophic webs.Keywords: Spartina anglica, stable isotopes, mixing models, IsoSource, Macoma, Mytilus, MyaINTRODUCTIONEstuarine salt marshes intercept nutrients and biomassfrom uplands and also export nutrients and biomass int<strong>on</strong>earshore coastal ecosystems (Deegan and Garritt 1997;Tealand Howes 2000; Valiela et al. 2000). The importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> saltmarsh productivity in estuarine ecosystems has been acentral research questi<strong>on</strong> with ramificati<strong>on</strong>s forec<strong>on</strong>omically important coastal fisheries (Peters<strong>on</strong> et al.1985, 1986; Teal and Howes 2000; Valiela et al. 2000).Few studies have addressed <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> role <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> invasive speciesin altering ecosystem processes in marine and estuarineenvir<strong>on</strong>ments (Ruiz et al. 1997, Grosholz 2002) despite <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>wealth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> research examining how invasive species alterlandscapes, nutrient cycling, and species interacti<strong>on</strong>s (Macket al. 2000 and references <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rein). Spartina anglica C. E.Hubbard (Poaceae; English cordgrass) was introduced int<strong>on</strong>or<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn Puget Sound, Washingt<strong>on</strong> in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> early 1960s inSnohomish County (Hacker et al. 2001; Hellquist 2005).Spartina anglica covers nearly 300 solid hectares (ha) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>Puget Sound intertidal habitat (Hedge et al. 2003). Spartinaanglica col<strong>on</strong>izes s<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>t sediments and is capable <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> rapidlyc<strong>on</strong>verting mudflat habitats into elevated Spartina meadows.Habitat c<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong> by Spartina is <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> great c<strong>on</strong>cernecologically, ec<strong>on</strong>omically, and aes<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>tically (Hacker et al.2001; Hedge et al. 2003).There are no native maritime species <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartina in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>Pacific Northwest <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> North America and thus mudflatecosystems <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Puget Sound have developed without lowintertidal meadows <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> emergent C 4 vegetati<strong>on</strong> (i.e. S.anglica) al<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir periphery. Generally, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> high carb<strong>on</strong>c<strong>on</strong>tents <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> C 4 plants have been c<strong>on</strong>sidered to be <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> lownutriti<strong>on</strong>al quality (Caswell et al. 1973). Extensive meadows<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartina that col<strong>on</strong>ize mudflats represent a large subsidy<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> low-quality productivity for c<strong>on</strong>sumers. At Alice Bay,Washingt<strong>on</strong>, S. anglica meadows had over 10 times <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>aboveground biomass as uninvaded mudflat (Hellquist2005). In Willapa Bay, Washingt<strong>on</strong>, col<strong>on</strong>izati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Zosterajap<strong>on</strong>ica and Spartina alterniflora has increased primaryproductivity by more than 50% in intertidal mudflats(Ruesink et al. 2006).- 153 -
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Invasive</strong> Spartina<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaAs noted for introduced Zostera jap<strong>on</strong>ica (Hahn 2003),<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> invasi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. anglica could potentially alter detritaldecompositi<strong>on</strong> rates and detrital quality within estuariesdominated by native eelgrass, Zostera marina. LikeSpartina alterniflora that has higher C:N ratios than Z.marina (Ruesink et al. 2006), mudflats col<strong>on</strong>ized by S.anglica have higher C:N ratios than those with nativeproducers (Hellquist 2005). Changes in detrital availabilityand quality may influence <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> feeding patterns <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> residentdetrital c<strong>on</strong>sumers. The S. anglica invasi<strong>on</strong> provides aunique opportunity to understand <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> trophic integrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>an invasive producer in an estuarine ecosystem.Estuarine food webs are complex due to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>predominance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> detrital pathways, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> abundance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>potential productivity sources for c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong>, omnivory,spatial heterogenity, and opportunistic feeding <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sumersthat may change throughout <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> course <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> year (Deeganand Garritt 1997; Riera et al. 1999). The use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> multiplestable isotopes (especially δ 13 C and δ 34 S) can providevaluable insight into how Spartina spp. may c<strong>on</strong>tribute to<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> diets <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> estuarine c<strong>on</strong>sumers (Peters<strong>on</strong> et al. 1986;Peters<strong>on</strong> and Howarth 1987; Deegan and Garritt 1997;Valiela et al. 2000; C<strong>on</strong>nolly et al. 2004). For example,13 C/ 12 C isotope ratios can distinguish C 3 from C 4 vegetati<strong>on</strong>or marine algae from terrestrial C 3 vegetati<strong>on</strong> (Fry and Sherr1984, Deegan and Garritt 1997). In marine studies, 34 S/ 32 Sisotope ratios are especially useful to distinguish sources <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>productivity because SO 2– 4 and HS – that are used by plantshave distinct isotopic signatures (Fry et al. 1982; Trust andFry 1992; C<strong>on</strong>nolly et al. 2004).Due to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sistency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> isotopic signatures fromproducers to c<strong>on</strong>sumers, trophic relati<strong>on</strong>ships can bediscerned from stable isotopic data that o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rwise mayremain virtually unknown (Fry and Sherr 1984; Peters<strong>on</strong> etal. 1985). Once isotopic data <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sumers and potentialdietary producers is obtained, stable isotopic mixing modelscan be used to estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sources (producers)that c<strong>on</strong>tribute to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> compositi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a mixture (c<strong>on</strong>sumers;Phillips 2001).We present data that describe <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> potential c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>s<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartina biomass to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> diets <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> three bivalves in nor<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rnPuget Sound through <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> δ 13 C and δ 34 S stable isotoperatios and mixing models calculated by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> computerapplicati<strong>on</strong> IsoSource (Phillips and Gregg 2003). As adeposit feeder that scours surface sediments for organicmatter, we expected that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> clam Macoma balthica wouldhave a Spartina c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> in its diet. For <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> filter feedersMya arenaria (s<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>t-shelled clam) and Mytilus sp. (mussel),we expected Spartina c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>s to be minimal or entirelyabsent.MATERIALS AND METHODSSamples were collected in March 2003 at West Pass(Camano Island, Island County, Washingt<strong>on</strong>; 48º 15’ 19” N,122º 24’ 56” W). The West Pass and English Boomshoreline is an extensive area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> mudflat fringed by nativesalt marsh and Spartina meadows located in south SkagitBay, just north <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> original introducti<strong>on</strong> site <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartinaanglica near Stanwood, Washingt<strong>on</strong>. This area is dominatedby approximately 100 ha <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. anglica meadows that growal<strong>on</strong>g mudflats adjacent to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> West Pass channel. Producerswere randomly collected al<strong>on</strong>g transects and included C 3emergent vascular vegetati<strong>on</strong> (Grindelia integrifolia andSalicornia virginica), submergent vascular vegetati<strong>on</strong>(Zostera marina), macroalgae (Fucus spiralis), and C 4vascular plants. C 4 plants included S. anglica (living leafand standing dead tissue) and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> native salt marsh grassDistichlis spicata.Three bivalve species (Macoma balthica, Mya arenaria,and Mytilus sp.) were chosen based <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir feeding patternsand co-occurrence with Spartina. Macoma is a surfacedeposit feeder, Mya a filter feeder, and Mytilus is anepifaunal filter feeder (Incze et al. 1982; Dame 1996). BothMacoma and Mya burrow in sediments immediately adjacentto Spartina meadows or burrow am<strong>on</strong>g Spartina roots al<strong>on</strong>gtidal channels. Mytilus was found al<strong>on</strong>g Spartina meadowstypically using Spartina root masses and stems as anchoringsubstrate. Bivalves and Spartina were randomly sampled <strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same transect at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> edge <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a large tidal channel thatpasses through <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> largest Spartina meadow at West Pass.Following collecti<strong>on</strong>, bivalves were held for 24 hours toallow gut c<strong>on</strong>tents to clear. Plant and animal samples werefrozen, cleaned to remove sediment, epiphytes, andcarb<strong>on</strong>ates (10% HCl acid washes) and dried in a dryingoven. Samples were ground into a fine powder prior toisotopic analysis. For Macoma all visceral mass tissue wasused for analysis, whereas for Mya and Mytilus adductormuscles were dissected for analysis. Sample sizes forMacoma, Mya, and Mytilus were 12, seven, and sevenindividuals respectively. Producer sample sizes ranged fromthree to seven collecti<strong>on</strong>s.Samples were analyzed for δ 13 C at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Idaho StableIsotope Laboratory, University <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Idaho, Moscow, Idaho.C<strong>on</strong>tinuous-flow stable isotopic analyses were c<strong>on</strong>ducted <strong>on</strong>a Finnigan-MAT, Delta+ isotope ratio mass spectrometer(Thermo Finnigan, Thermo Electr<strong>on</strong>: Waltham,Massachusetts). Samples were flash-combusted in a NC2500 elemental analyzer (CE Instruments, Thermo Electr<strong>on</strong>:Waltham, Massachusetts) interfaced with a C<strong>on</strong>flo II. Stableisotope ratios are <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ratio (R) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 13 C/ 12 C or 34 S/ 32 Sexpressed in standard delta (δ) notati<strong>on</strong> values in parts permille (‰) where δ 13 C or δ 34 S = [(R sample /R standard)-1 ]*1000.The δ 13 C and δ 15 N reference standard was acetanilide (δ 13 C= -26.07‰ ± 0.11‰; δ 15 N = -0.33 ± 0.17‰). Spinach wasused as an internal standard (δ 13 C = -26.2‰ ± 0.2‰).Sample analysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> δ 34 S was c<strong>on</strong>ducted by Iso-Analytical Limited (Sandbach, Cheshire, United Kingdom).The reference standard was NBS-127 (barium sulfateδ 34 S V-CDT = 20.3‰; IAEA, Vienna, Austria). Calibrati<strong>on</strong> and- 154 -
- Page 2 and 3:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 4 and 5:
FORWARD & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe <stro
- Page 6 and 7:
TABLE OF CONTENTSForward & Acknowle
- Page 9 and 10:
Community Spartina Education and St
- Page 11 and 12:
included the docum
- Page 14:
CHAPTER ONESpartina Biology
- Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 28 and 29:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 30 and 31:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 32 and 33:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 34:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 42 and 43:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 44:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 47 and 48:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 49 and 50:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 55 and 56:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 57 and 58:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 60 and 61:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 62 and 63:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 64 and 65:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 66:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 74 and 75:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 76:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 81 and 82:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 83 and 84:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 86 and 87:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 88 and 89:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 90 and 91:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 92 and 93:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 94 and 95:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 96 and 97:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 98:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 108 and 109:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 110:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 113 and 114:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 115 and 116: Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 122 and 123: Proceedings <stron
- Page 124 and 125: Proceedings <stron
- Page 126 and 127: Proceedings <stron
- Page 128: Proceedings <stron
- Page 131 and 132: Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 134 and 135: Proceedings <stron
- Page 136 and 137: Proceedings <stron
- Page 138 and 139: Proceedings <stron
- Page 140: CHAPTER THREEEcosystem Effects <str
- Page 143 and 144: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 145 and 146: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 148 and 149: Proceedings <stron
- Page 150 and 151: Proceedings <stron
- Page 152: Proceedings <stron
- Page 155 and 156: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 157 and 158: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 160 and 161: Proceedings <stron
- Page 162 and 163: Proceedings <stron
- Page 164: Proceedings <stron
- Page 169 and 170: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 171 and 172: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 174 and 175: Proceedings <stron
- Page 176: Proceedings <stron
- Page 179 and 180: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 181 and 182: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 184 and 185: Proceedings <stron
- Page 186 and 187: Proceedings <stron
- Page 188 and 189: Proceedings <stron
- Page 190 and 191: Proceedings <stron
- Page 192 and 193: Proceedings <stron
- Page 194 and 195: Proceedings <stron
- Page 196: Proceedings <stron
- Page 199 and 200: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 201 and 202: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 204 and 205: Proceedings <stron
- Page 206 and 207: Proceedings <stron
- Page 208 and 209: Proceedings <stron
- Page 210 and 211: Proceedings <stron
- Page 212: Proceedings <stron
- Page 216 and 217:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 218 and 219:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 220 and 221:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 222 and 223:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 224 and 225:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 226 and 227:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 228 and 229:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 230 and 231:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 232 and 233:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 234 and 235:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 236 and 237:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 238 and 239:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 240 and 241:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 242 and 243:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 244 and 245:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 246:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 249 and 250:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 251 and 252:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 253 and 254:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 255 and 256:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 257 and 258:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 259 and 260:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 261 and 262:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 263 and 264:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 265 and 266:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 267 and 268:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 269 and 270:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 271 and 272:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 273 and 274:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 276 and 277:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 278 and 279:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 280 and 281:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 282 and 283:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 284 and 285:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 286 and 287:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 288 and 289:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 290:
Proceedings <stron