12.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Invasive ...

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Invasive ...

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Invasive ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaChapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Invasive</strong> Spartinaeach mudflat secti<strong>on</strong> we estimated <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> slope (assumed linear)by dividing <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total change in elevati<strong>on</strong> across <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mudflat(MTL) by mudflat width (slope = rise/run). Then we createdtwo 3-m elevati<strong>on</strong> grids based <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> following equati<strong>on</strong>s,where each 3- m pixel value was equal to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> elevati<strong>on</strong> atthat point:(1) elevati<strong>on</strong> 1 = slope * distance to MLLW; and(2) elevati<strong>on</strong> 2 = MTL – (slope * distance to MTL).We averaged <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se two grids to obtain <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> final 3-mmudflat elevati<strong>on</strong> grid (DEM). Values greater than localMTL were redefined to be equal to local MTL.Tidal Inundati<strong>on</strong> and Shorebird Habitat ValuePublished verified c<strong>on</strong>tinuous (six-minute interval)water level data was available from NOS for <strong>on</strong>ly three <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>seven tide stati<strong>on</strong> locati<strong>on</strong>s: Alameda (stati<strong>on</strong> ID 9414750,year 2001), Dumbart<strong>on</strong> Bridge (stati<strong>on</strong> ID 9414509, year1996), and Redwood City (stati<strong>on</strong> ID 9414523, year 2002).Assuming that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> tidal inundati<strong>on</strong> regime for each mudflatarea was most similar to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nearest tide stati<strong>on</strong> with availablec<strong>on</strong>tinous water level data, we created a tide stati<strong>on</strong> gridlayer by allocating each 3-m pixel to a tide stati<strong>on</strong> (Fig. 1).Because our shorebird data collecti<strong>on</strong> efforts were centeredaround April and September, we generated m<strong>on</strong>thly inundati<strong>on</strong>curves for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se m<strong>on</strong>ths using cumulative water level datafrom each tide stati<strong>on</strong> using Stata 8.0 (2003) (Fig. 2).Water level values were in meters above MLLW. Topredict <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> m<strong>on</strong>thly tidal inundati<strong>on</strong> percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> each 3-mmudflat pixel, we performed separate polynomial regressi<strong>on</strong>analyses (Stata 8.0, 2003) for each tide stati<strong>on</strong> and eachm<strong>on</strong>th (April and September) using <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> appropriate NOS6 minute water level data. Resulting regressi<strong>on</strong> equati<strong>on</strong>s(Table 1) were used to calculate grids representing April andSeptember inundati<strong>on</strong>. Separate equati<strong>on</strong>s were developedfor each tide stati<strong>on</strong> so grids for each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> three tide stati<strong>on</strong>Table 1. Coefficients for regressi<strong>on</strong> equati<strong>on</strong>s used to predict inundati<strong>on</strong>from elevati<strong>on</strong>. Equati<strong>on</strong>s were based <strong>on</strong> inundati<strong>on</strong> curves obtained from6-minute water level data from NOS tide stati<strong>on</strong>s and took <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> form y =ax + bx 2 + cx 3 + d, where y = percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> time inundated and x = elevati<strong>on</strong>above MLLW.Tide stati<strong>on</strong> M<strong>on</strong>th a b c d R2Alameda April -27.9 -24.9 7.85 91.3 0.9974Alameda Sept -21.6 -28.4 7.92 96.4 0.9997Dumbart<strong>on</strong>BridgeApril -19.7 -13.7 2.93 94.6 0.9990Dumbart<strong>on</strong>BridgeSept -20.4 -12.1 2.36 98.2 0.9984RedwoodCityApril -20.4 -16.8 4.01 93.9 0.9974RedwoodCitySept -15.7 -18.2 3.79 97.9 0.9994areas could be calculated separately and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n merged to create<strong>on</strong>e seamless 3-m inundati<strong>on</strong> grid for each seas<strong>on</strong>. We <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ngenerated grids representing April and September mudflatexposure (100 - m<strong>on</strong>thly inundati<strong>on</strong> percent), as indices <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>overall shorebird habitat value (Fig. 3).Potential Spartina SpreadCumulative water level data (m above MLLW) from eachtide stati<strong>on</strong> were used to generate m<strong>on</strong>thly June inundati<strong>on</strong>curves using Stata 8.0 (2003). For each tide stati<strong>on</strong>, June dura-Fig. 2. Cumulative durati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tidal inundati<strong>on</strong> curves for April based <strong>on</strong>water level data from Alameda, Redwood City, and Dumbart<strong>on</strong> Bridgetide stati<strong>on</strong>s. Elevati<strong>on</strong>s corresp<strong>on</strong>ding to 60% inundati<strong>on</strong> were 0.762 m,1.018 m, and 1.083 m, respectively.Fig. 3. April mudflat habitat availability, based <strong>on</strong> m<strong>on</strong>thly mudflat exposureexpressed as 100% - m<strong>on</strong>thly mudflat inundati<strong>on</strong>. Color shadings representmudflat habitat quantiles, where 20% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total area is c<strong>on</strong>tained in eachshading category and darker colors have higher value.- 177 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!