<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaChapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaTHE EFFECTS OF GRAZING GEESE ON HYBRID AND NATIVE SPARTINA IN SANFRANCISCO BAYE.D. GROSHOLZ 1 AND R.E. BLAKE 2Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Science and Policy, University <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> California, Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616tedgrosholz@ucdavis.edu 1 ; reblake@vims.edu 2The invasi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartina alterniflora has become <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> most significant invasi<strong>on</strong>s in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>already heavily invaded San Francisco Bay. The Spartina invasi<strong>on</strong> has resulted in many changes tocommunity and ecosystem processes at lower trophic levels, however, we have so far failed todocument equivalent changes at higher trophic levels that are likely occurring as well. In this study,we report <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sequences <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrid invasi<strong>on</strong> with respect to an important vertebrate grazer,western Canada geese (Branta canadensis m<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fitti). Canada geese regularly nest during winterm<strong>on</strong>ths in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> vicinity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> invaded central and sou<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn areas <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> San Francisco Bay. We foundthat Canada geese intensively graze native Spartina foliosa at several study sites in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> central bayregi<strong>on</strong> removing up to 90% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> aboveground vegetati<strong>on</strong>. However, geese completely ignorehybrid Spartina with virtually no evidence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> grazing in hybrid areas adjacent to heavily grazednative Spartina areas. Experiments with captive geese dem<strong>on</strong>strated that geese repeatedly preferrednative Spartina when presented intact cl<strong>on</strong>es <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrid and native cl<strong>on</strong>es in side-by-side preferencetrials. However, when cut stems were presented in similar trials, geese showed no preference for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>native over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrid. We c<strong>on</strong>clude that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> preference dem<strong>on</strong>strated in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first experiment wasnot <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> plant defensive chemistry, but <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> physical differences between intactcl<strong>on</strong>es and cut stems that geese could assess. Field exclosure experiments c<strong>on</strong>ducted for two years inareas where hybrid Spartina was overgrowing native Spartina showed that grazing <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> nativeSpartina by geese resulted in 25% greater rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> lateral spread <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrid into native areas. Thissuggests that grazing by geese may be accelerating <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> invasi<strong>on</strong> and ultimate replacement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>native Spartina by hybrid Spartina.Keywords: Canada geese, San Francisco Bay, hybrid Spartina, grazing, invasi<strong>on</strong> rateINTRODUCTIONThe introducti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> smooth cordgrass (Spartinaalterniflora) has been am<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> most significant <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>nearly 250 n<strong>on</strong>-native species invasi<strong>on</strong>s recorded in SanFrancisco Bay (Cohen and Carlt<strong>on</strong> 1998). Spartinaalterniflora became established in 1976 as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> anintenti<strong>on</strong>al introducti<strong>on</strong> by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Army Corp <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Engineers formitigati<strong>on</strong> purposes (Faber 2000). Following establishment,S. alterniflora hybridized with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> native cordgrass S.foliosa. Hybrid Spartina has rapidly col<strong>on</strong>ized many areas<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> central and south San Francisco Bay (Daehler and Str<strong>on</strong>g1997; Ayres et al. 2004). Hybrid Spartina can col<strong>on</strong>ize openmudflats as well as out-compete native vegetati<strong>on</strong> at highertidal heights (Ayres et al. 2004).Recent studies have shown that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ecologicalrepercussi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrid Spartina invasi<strong>on</strong> are farreaching with widespread impacts <strong>on</strong> community structureand ecosystem functi<strong>on</strong> (Neira et al. 2005, 2006, 2007;Levin et al. 2006). However, work to date has focused <strong>on</strong>ly<strong>on</strong> changes at lower trophic levels, despite <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fact thatvertebrate herbivores are known to c<strong>on</strong>sume S. alterniflorain its native regi<strong>on</strong> (Buchsbaum et al. 1981). Little is knownregarding <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sequences <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybridizati<strong>on</strong> forsusceptibility to herbivores <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> any kind (Daehler and Str<strong>on</strong>g1997).Am<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> most comm<strong>on</strong> and potentially importantvertebrate herbivores <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartina are western Canada geese,Branta canadensis m<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fitti (Banks et al. 2004). The westernsubspecies is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e regularly found in San FranciscoBay (Mowbray et al. 2002) and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y typically nest fromNovember to April. While nesting, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir foraging isgenerally restricted to nearby areas that typically includemudflats with native Spartina. Our initial observati<strong>on</strong>ssuggested that geese were grazing intensively <strong>on</strong> areasoccupied by native Spartina. One <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> key questi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>this study was to determine whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r grazing by westernCanada geese could influence <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> invasi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybridSpartina in San Francisco Bay. Therefore, our goal was tomeasure grazing by Canada geese <strong>on</strong> native Spartina andcompare this with grazing <strong>on</strong> hybrid Spartina. If we foundevidence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> selective grazing, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> next goal would be todetermine whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r selective grazing was due to ameasurable preference for <strong>on</strong>e plant over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r. Wewould also determine <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> basis for any preference that mightexist. Finally, we would quantify any influence that geese- 191 -
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Invasive</strong> Spartina<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> Spartinagrazing might have <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> invasi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybridSpartina into areas occupied by native Spartina.METHODSGrazing Intensity in San Francisco BayTo estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> intensity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> grazing by western Canadageese, we measured grazing at three sites in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> centralporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> San Francisco Bay: Point Isabel (37º53’30’’N;122º20’55’’W), Robert’s Landing (37º40’13’’N;122º28’48’’W), and Oro Loma (37º37’45’’N;122º09’08’’W). These sites were distributed al<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>eastern margin <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> San Francisco Bay and each c<strong>on</strong>tainedareas <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> native S. foliosa with varying degrees <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cover byhybrid Spartina. At each site, we laid 30 meter (m) transectsal<strong>on</strong>g which 10 0.25 m x 0.25 m quadrats were established atrandomly chosen points. Plant samples to verify geneticidentificati<strong>on</strong> (hybrid vs. native) were taken within severalquadrats and kept refrigerated until genetic assays usingrandom amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers couldbe c<strong>on</strong>ducted at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartina genetics lab at UC Davis(Ayres, unpublished results), typically less than a week aftercollecti<strong>on</strong>. Genetic determinati<strong>on</strong> followed previouslypublished protocols (Ayres et al. 1999). In some cases, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>area covered by native S. foliosa was smaller so shortertransects with fewer quadrats were used. Within eachquadrat, we measured <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> stems that had beengrazed or not by geese and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> heights <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 15 stems to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>nearest <strong>on</strong>e centimeter (cm). Grazing produces characteristicdamage that is easily identified. At sites where we also haddata for hybrid Spartina, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same measurements were madeal<strong>on</strong>g similar transects. We tested <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> stemsgrazed by geese between native and hybrid transects.Field Grazing ExclosuresTo experimentally measure <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> grazingCanada geese <strong>on</strong> both native and hybrid Spartina in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>field, we c<strong>on</strong>ducted exclosure experiments at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> RobertsLanding site. At this site, we established goose exclosuresin three areas (six replicates per treatment). The first areawas in a c<strong>on</strong>tinuous meadow <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> native S. foliosa. Thesec<strong>on</strong>d was in a c<strong>on</strong>tinuous meadow <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrid Spartina. Thethird was located where hybrid Spartina was overgrowingnative Spartina. In single species stands we c<strong>on</strong>structed a 1m x 1 m exclosure cage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> plastic mesh (4 cm x 4 cmopenings) attached by electrical cable ties to polyvinylchloride (PVC) posts. At border areas with both native andhybrid Spartina, we established exclosure cages 1 m x 4 mwith <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> l<strong>on</strong>g axis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> exclosure perpendicular to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>hybrid-native border. The center <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> exclosure (at 2 m)was positi<strong>on</strong>ed to be over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> approximate border edge at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>time <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>. Adjacent c<strong>on</strong>trol areas for both singlespecies exclosures and border exclosures were establishedwithin 2 m <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> exclosure cages. The c<strong>on</strong>trol areas weredelineated with PVC posts at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> corners. We estimated <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>linear distance in spread for c<strong>on</strong>trol and exclosure treatmentsby measuring <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> distance (to nearest 0.1 m) from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybridborder at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> start <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> experiment to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> leading edge <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> spread after two years. We tested differences withAnalysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Variance (ANOVA) using log transformedvalues for distance and treatment (exclosure vs. c<strong>on</strong>trol) asfixed factors using SAS versi<strong>on</strong> 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary,North Carolina).Grazing Trials with Intact Cl<strong>on</strong>esIn order to determine <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> extent that observed grazingwas <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> preference for native Spartina ra<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r thanavailability or o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r factors, we c<strong>on</strong>ducted grazing trialsduring February-March 2003 using a small group (six) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>captive western Canada geese maintained by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> WildlifeDepartment at Humboldt State University (HSU), Arcata,California. This group <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> geese had been maintainedtoge<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r for several years <strong>on</strong> processed diets. Theexperiment involved using intact segments (0.5 m x 0.5 m x0.5 m) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> two cl<strong>on</strong>es <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ei<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r hybrid or native Spartina<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fered in brown plastic bins. Each plant segment had beenexcavated from field sites in San Francisco Bay (hybridplants from Elsie Roemer Bird Sanctuary, City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Alamedaand S. foliosa from Bothin Marsh, City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Mill Valley) anddriven to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Humboldt aviary <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> next day. All stems andleaves were counted for each cl<strong>on</strong>e prior to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> start <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>experiment. At <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> beginning <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> experiment, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> tubswith <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> cl<strong>on</strong>e segments were established in a two by twoarray approximately 2 m apart. The geese were <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n allowedto enter <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> aviary and encounter <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> cl<strong>on</strong>es. We made focalobservati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> each cl<strong>on</strong>e at <strong>on</strong>e minute intervals noting <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> geese grazing <strong>on</strong> each. After two hours, wecollected <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> cl<strong>on</strong>es and measured <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> stems andleaves that had been grazed by geese. The entire experimentwas repeated three times over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> following three weeks.We estimated <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> intensity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> grazing by counting <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> leaves and stems that had been grazed during<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> trial for both hybrid and native cl<strong>on</strong>es. We testeddifferences in grazing with ANOVA using arc-sintranformed percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> leaves or stems with treatment as afixed factor (as above).Grazing Trials with Clipped StemsTo determine whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> preferences <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> experimentalgeese were determined by differences in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> physicalproperties <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> plants versus differences in plant chemistry,we used <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same group <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> geese during experiments fromFebruary-March 2004. We collected stems <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> both nativeand hybrid Spartina at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same sites used for collecting <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>cl<strong>on</strong>es <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> previous year. We cut <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> stems at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> base <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>plant and wrapped <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m in large plastic bags for shipment.Stems were kept refrigerated from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> time <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> clipping andsent to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> aviary at HSU within 24 hours and were usedimmediately <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>reafter in feeding trials. Geese showed <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>- 192 -
- Page 2 and 3:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 4 and 5:
FORWARD & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe <stro
- Page 6 and 7:
TABLE OF CONTENTSForward & Acknowle
- Page 9 and 10:
Community Spartina Education and St
- Page 11 and 12:
included the docum
- Page 14:
CHAPTER ONESpartina Biology
- Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 28 and 29:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 30 and 31:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 32 and 33:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 34:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 42 and 43:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 44:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 47 and 48:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 49 and 50:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 55 and 56:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 57 and 58:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 60 and 61:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 62 and 63:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 64 and 65:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 66:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 74 and 75:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 76:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 81 and 82:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 83 and 84:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 86 and 87:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 88 and 89:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 90 and 91:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 92 and 93:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 94 and 95:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 96 and 97:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 98:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 108 and 109:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 110:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 113 and 114:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 115 and 116:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 122 and 123:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 124 and 125:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 126 and 127:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 128:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 134 and 135:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 136 and 137:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 138 and 139:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 140:
CHAPTER THREEEcosystem Effects <str
- Page 143 and 144:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 145 and 146:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 148 and 149:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 150 and 151:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 152: Proceedings <stron
- Page 155 and 156: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 157 and 158: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 160 and 161: Proceedings <stron
- Page 162 and 163: Proceedings <stron
- Page 164: Proceedings <stron
- Page 167 and 168: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 169 and 170: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 171 and 172: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 174 and 175: Proceedings <stron
- Page 176: Proceedings <stron
- Page 179 and 180: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 181 and 182: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 184 and 185: Proceedings <stron
- Page 186 and 187: Proceedings <stron
- Page 188 and 189: Proceedings <stron
- Page 190 and 191: Proceedings <stron
- Page 192 and 193: Proceedings <stron
- Page 194 and 195: Proceedings <stron
- Page 196: Proceedings <stron
- Page 199 and 200: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 201 and 202: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 206 and 207: Proceedings <stron
- Page 208 and 209: Proceedings <stron
- Page 210 and 211: Proceedings <stron
- Page 212: Proceedings <stron
- Page 216 and 217: Proceedings <stron
- Page 218 and 219: Proceedings <stron
- Page 220 and 221: Proceedings <stron
- Page 222 and 223: Proceedings <stron
- Page 224 and 225: Proceedings <stron
- Page 226 and 227: Proceedings <stron
- Page 228 and 229: Proceedings <stron
- Page 230 and 231: Proceedings <stron
- Page 232 and 233: Proceedings <stron
- Page 234 and 235: Proceedings <stron
- Page 236 and 237: Proceedings <stron
- Page 238 and 239: Proceedings <stron
- Page 240 and 241: Proceedings <stron
- Page 242 and 243: Proceedings <stron
- Page 244 and 245: Proceedings <stron
- Page 246: Proceedings <stron
- Page 249 and 250: Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 251 and 252: Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 253 and 254:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 255 and 256:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 257 and 258:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 259 and 260:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 261 and 262:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 263 and 264:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 265 and 266:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 267 and 268:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 269 and 270:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 271 and 272:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 273 and 274:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 276 and 277:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 278 and 279:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 280 and 281:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 282 and 283:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 284 and 285:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 286 and 287:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 288 and 289:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 290:
Proceedings <stron