<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaChapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaQUANTIFYING THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF THE SPARTINA INVASION ON INVERTEBRATEFOOD RESOURCES FOR FORAGING SHOREBIRDS IN SAN FRANCISCO BAYN. CHRISTIANSEN 1 , E.D. GROSHOLZ 2 AND P. ROSSODepartment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Science and Policy, University <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> California, Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 956161 n.a.christiansen@gmail.com; 2 tedgrosholz@ucdavis.eduThe extensive mudflats <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> San Francisco Bay estuary are critical habitats and foraging groundsfor migratory shorebirds. However, San Francisco Bay has experienced invasi<strong>on</strong> by hundreds <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>n<strong>on</strong>-native introduced species, and its productive mudflats are now threatened by <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se —hybrid Spartina alterniflora. To assess <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> potential effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> invasive cordgrass <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>shorebird foraging habitat, we quantified invertebrate abundance and biomass al<strong>on</strong>g transectsextending from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> edge <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartina meadow to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lowest tide line at two locati<strong>on</strong>s in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> bay,Robert’s Landing and Elsie Roemer. We also estimated <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> size <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> areas potentially invaded bySpartina using tidal elevati<strong>on</strong> data based <strong>on</strong> LIDAR images and tidal inundati<strong>on</strong> data taken fromc<strong>on</strong>tinuous tidal height m<strong>on</strong>itoring stati<strong>on</strong>s. We found that invertebrate biomass was greatest athigher tidal elevati<strong>on</strong>s nearer to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> marsh, while abundance was greatest at intermediate distancesfrom <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> marsh. Current estimates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tolerance to tidal inundati<strong>on</strong> indicate that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> area col<strong>on</strong>ized bySpartina could increase by as much as four to eight times its present size, depending <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>individual site characteristics. These data suggest that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is a high potential for losing significantamounts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> valuable foraging habitat for shorebirds if Spartina extends its distributi<strong>on</strong> to predictedtidal elevati<strong>on</strong>s in San Francisco Bay.Keywords: shorebirds, San Francisco Bay, Hybrid Spartina, infaunaINTRODUCTIONSan Francisco Bay is now home to more than 250species <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> n<strong>on</strong>-native plants and animals (Cohen and Carlt<strong>on</strong>1998). One <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> most serious recent invasi<strong>on</strong>s has been <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>smooth cordgrass Spartina alterniflora, which is native to<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> eastern coast <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North America. Since itsintroducti<strong>on</strong>, S. alterniflora has hybridized with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nativecordgrass S. foliosa creating a hybrid that has rapidlycol<strong>on</strong>ized many areas <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> central and south San FranciscoBay (Daelher and Str<strong>on</strong>g 1997, Ayres et al. 2004). Thehybrid can col<strong>on</strong>ize open mudflats as well as out-competenative vegetati<strong>on</strong> at higher tidal heights (Ayres et al. 2004).The ecological repercussi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this invasi<strong>on</strong> are farreaching with widespread impacts <strong>on</strong> community structureand ecosystem functi<strong>on</strong> (Neira et al. 2005; 2006, Levin et al.2006).One <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> most serious c<strong>on</strong>sequences <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrid Spartinainvasi<strong>on</strong> is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> loss <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> open mudflat habitat for shorebirds.San Francisco Bay, with its extensive mudflats, c<strong>on</strong>tainscritical habitat for more than <strong>on</strong>e milli<strong>on</strong> migratory shorebirdsand is <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> most important estuaries al<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>Pacific Flyway (Page et al. 1999). This important habitat isnow threatened by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> smooth cordgrass. Shorebirds requireunvegetated mudflat habitats for foraging (Goss-Custard andMoser 1988), and invasive hybrid Spartina threatens tocol<strong>on</strong>ize critical upper levels <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this important habitat. As aresult <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> rapid spread <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrid Spartina, which increasedby 317% at sampled sites between 2001 and 2003(Ayres et al. 2004), by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2003 it was estimated tooccupy nearly 800 hectares <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> bay habitat, up from less than200 acres in 2001 (Zaremba and McGowen 2004). Thisrapid spread suggests that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> risk for shorebird habitat lossmay be substantial.To better estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> potential value and extent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> lostforaging habitat, we measured <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> biomass and abundance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>invertebrates at different tidal elevati<strong>on</strong>s at two sites in SanFrancisco Bay. To accurately measure tidal elevati<strong>on</strong> acrossbroad areas <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> two study sites, we used LIDAR (LightDetecti<strong>on</strong> and Ranging), a flight-based radar system that canaccurately measure elevati<strong>on</strong> with high spatial resoluti<strong>on</strong>.We used <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se elevati<strong>on</strong> data toge<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r with tidal height datafrom c<strong>on</strong>tinuous recording stati<strong>on</strong>s to estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> arealikely to be invaded by Spartina based <strong>on</strong> current estimates<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its inundati<strong>on</strong> tolerance. Therefore, we were able toestimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> value and extent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> habitat lost to shorebirdsunder different scenarios <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartina spread. Thisinformati<strong>on</strong>, when combined with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> data <strong>on</strong> patterns <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>shorebird usage generated by PRBO C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Science(Stralberg et al. 2010) can help guide future eradicati<strong>on</strong>efforts by highlighting areas <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> particular importance forshorebirds.- 171 -
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Invasive</strong> Spartina<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaMETHODSTo determine <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> distributi<strong>on</strong> and abundance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> keyinvertebrate taxa <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> importance for foraging shorebirds, wesampled infauna at two sites in central San Francisco Baywith open mudflats that are being invaded by hybridSpartina: Elsie Roemer Bird Sanctuary <strong>on</strong> Alameda Island(37º45’35’’N; 122º28’48’’W) and Roberts Landing in SanLorenzo (37º40’13’’N; 122º28’48’’W). At both sites, weestablished three transects spanning <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> entire tidal range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mudflat (several hundred meters) from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> edge <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>Spartina meadow to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> channel. We collected sedimentcore samples from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> following distances from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> seawardedge <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrid Spartina meadow: 1, 10, 50, 100, and 200meters (m) and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>reafter at approximately 100 m intervalsto within 50 m <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> channel edge. At Elsie Roemersampling extended up to 350 m, whereas at Robert’sLanding, sampling extended up to 850 m from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> meadow.At each sampling locati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>on</strong>e infauna sample was collectedwith a 5 centimeters (cm) diameter core taken to 5 cm depth.The locati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> each sample site was recorded with ashoulder mounted GPS (Global Positi<strong>on</strong>ing System, TrimblePro-XR). In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lab, samples were sieved at 500 micrometers(μm) to collect organisms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> importance for shorebirds. Allorganisms were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for at least24 hours, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n stored in 70% ethanol stained with rosebengal.We estimated <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> biomass <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> invertebrates for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> threemost comm<strong>on</strong> phyla (>95% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> biomass): Annelida,Arthropoda (Crustacea), and Mollusca. We regressedbiomass for all taxa and for each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> three comm<strong>on</strong> phyla<strong>on</strong> distance from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> edge <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartina meadow definedas <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lower limit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tiguous aboveground vegetati<strong>on</strong>.We used LIDAR images that resulted from a moreextensive flyover <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> San Francisco Bay, but includeddetailed views <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> two study sites. Images permittedestimati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tidal elevati<strong>on</strong>s to within 0.1 m atapproximately 1 m spatial resoluti<strong>on</strong> in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> x-y plane. Thesedata were used to develop images <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> study site withwhich we could estimate area covered by Spartina assumingit could spread downward in tidal elevati<strong>on</strong> to a particulartidal level. We used <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se images toge<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r withgeoreferenced sampling sites to determine <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> abundanceand distributi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> invertebrates at particular tidal elevati<strong>on</strong>s.We calculated inundati<strong>on</strong> as a functi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tidal elevati<strong>on</strong>s,using c<strong>on</strong>tinuous water level data available from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nati<strong>on</strong>alOceanic and Atmospheric Administrati<strong>on</strong> (NOAA) usingstati<strong>on</strong> # 9414750 Alameda, CA for both sites. Tidal data weremeasured in meters above mean low low water (MLLW) based<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> updated Nati<strong>on</strong>al Tidal Datum Epoch (NTDE). We usedhourly tidal data to estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> percentage time for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> year2004 that a given elevati<strong>on</strong> determined from LIDAR imageswould be inundated.RESULTSInvertebrate biomass at higher tidal elevati<strong>on</strong>s wasapproximately triple <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> biomass at lower elevati<strong>on</strong>s whenboth sites were analyzed toge<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r (Fig. 1) based <strong>on</strong> anexp<strong>on</strong>ential regressi<strong>on</strong> curve:y = 18.593 e -0.0032x , R² = 0.36 (1)However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> abundance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> invertebrates was greatest atintermediate tidal elevati<strong>on</strong>s (Fig. 2), and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> least at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>lowest elevati<strong>on</strong>s based <strong>on</strong> a polynomial regressi<strong>on</strong> curve:Total Biomass (gm)60y = 18.593e -0.0032x50R 2 = 0.36344030201000 200 400 600 800 1000Distance from Marsh Edge (m)Fig. 1. Total invertebrate biomass as a functi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> distance from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>marsh edge at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> current lower tidal limit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrid Spartina.Fig. 2. LIDAR image <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Elsie Roemer site showing lower extent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>hybrid Spartina distributi<strong>on</strong> (grey) and invertebrate sampling points al<strong>on</strong>gtransects (dots).- 172 -
- Page 2 and 3:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 4 and 5:
FORWARD & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe <stro
- Page 6 and 7:
TABLE OF CONTENTSForward & Acknowle
- Page 9 and 10:
Community Spartina Education and St
- Page 11 and 12:
included the docum
- Page 14:
CHAPTER ONESpartina Biology
- Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 28 and 29:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 30 and 31:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 32 and 33:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 34:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 42 and 43:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 44:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 47 and 48:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 49 and 50:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 55 and 56:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 57 and 58:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 60 and 61:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 62 and 63:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 64 and 65:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 66:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 74 and 75:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 76:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 81 and 82:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 83 and 84:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 86 and 87:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 88 and 89:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 90 and 91:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 92 and 93:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 94 and 95:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 96 and 97:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 98:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 108 and 109:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 110:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 113 and 114:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 115 and 116:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 122 and 123:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 124 and 125:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 126 and 127:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 128:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 134 and 135: Proceedings <stron
- Page 136 and 137: Proceedings <stron
- Page 138 and 139: Proceedings <stron
- Page 140: CHAPTER THREEEcosystem Effects <str
- Page 143 and 144: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 145 and 146: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 148 and 149: Proceedings <stron
- Page 150 and 151: Proceedings <stron
- Page 152: Proceedings <stron
- Page 155 and 156: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 157 and 158: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 160 and 161: Proceedings <stron
- Page 162 and 163: Proceedings <stron
- Page 164: Proceedings <stron
- Page 167 and 168: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 169 and 170: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 171 and 172: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 174 and 175: Proceedings <stron
- Page 176: Proceedings <stron
- Page 179 and 180: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 181 and 182: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 186 and 187: Proceedings <stron
- Page 188 and 189: Proceedings <stron
- Page 190 and 191: Proceedings <stron
- Page 192 and 193: Proceedings <stron
- Page 194 and 195: Proceedings <stron
- Page 196: Proceedings <stron
- Page 199 and 200: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 201 and 202: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 204 and 205: Proceedings <stron
- Page 206 and 207: Proceedings <stron
- Page 208 and 209: Proceedings <stron
- Page 210 and 211: Proceedings <stron
- Page 212: Proceedings <stron
- Page 216 and 217: Proceedings <stron
- Page 218 and 219: Proceedings <stron
- Page 220 and 221: Proceedings <stron
- Page 222 and 223: Proceedings <stron
- Page 224 and 225: Proceedings <stron
- Page 226 and 227: Proceedings <stron
- Page 228 and 229: Proceedings <stron
- Page 230 and 231: Proceedings <stron
- Page 232 and 233: Proceedings <stron
- Page 234 and 235:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 236 and 237:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 238 and 239:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 240 and 241:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 242 and 243:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 244 and 245:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 246:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 249 and 250:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 251 and 252:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 253 and 254:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 255 and 256:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 257 and 258:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 259 and 260:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 261 and 262:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 263 and 264:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 265 and 266:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 267 and 268:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 269 and 270:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 271 and 272:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 273 and 274:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 276 and 277:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 278 and 279:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 280 and 281:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 282 and 283:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 284 and 285:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 286 and 287:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 288 and 289:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 290:
Proceedings <stron