12.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Invasive ...

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Invasive ...

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Invasive ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 4: Spartina C<strong>on</strong>trol and Management<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> Spartinaei<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r brachypterous (rudimentary or abnormally small) ormacropterous (l<strong>on</strong>g or large).We found striking differences am<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fourpopulati<strong>on</strong>s in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> densities attained by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> summer(Fig. 1A; ANOVA F=9.227, P=0.002). The best performinggeographic source, in terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> densities <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> P. marginataobtained by end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> summer, was Rhode Island, which is also<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> locati<strong>on</strong> with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> best summer temperature match toWillapa Bay. In post-hoc tests, Rhode Island populati<strong>on</strong>ssignificantly differed from Georgia and Virginia, but did notsignificantly differ from California. California did notsignificantly differ from Georgia and Virginia.The populati<strong>on</strong>s also differed in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>populati<strong>on</strong> that was in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> adult stage at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>September (Fig. 1B; ANOVA F=3.637, P=0.030). Californiapopulati<strong>on</strong>s had four to five times <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> adultsfound in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r populati<strong>on</strong>s. This may indicate differencesin phenology although fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r data is needed.Finally, we found differences am<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fourpopulati<strong>on</strong>s in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> individuals that weremacropterous (Fig. 4C; ANOVA F=8.71, P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!