<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaChapter 1: Spartina BiologyThese vegetative adaptive traits are also complementedby a number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> important reproductive adaptati<strong>on</strong>s thatinclude: (1) wind pollinati<strong>on</strong>; (2) asynchr<strong>on</strong>ous flowering;i.e. protogyny (i.e. females flower first, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n males comeinto bloom) which promotes out-crossing yet allows someoverlap in flowering time so that individuals can partiallyself-fertilize (reproductive insurance); (3) producti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>large numbers <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> small seeds that can be dispersed byflotati<strong>on</strong> (hydrochory); (4) seeds with awns and o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rstructures that make <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m available for attachment to birdfea<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rs and potential avian dispersal (Vivian-Smith andStiles 1994); (5) vegetative rhizome fragments that can betransported by water to fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r spread individual genotypes;(6) phenology cued into optimal c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s for flowering(late summer), seed set (fall) and dispersal during winterstorm events; and (7) timing <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> dispersal coinciding withfresh c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> estuary during winter flooding, suchthat fresh water c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s promote germinati<strong>on</strong> andestablishment.The unique suite <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> vegetative and reproductiveadaptati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. foliosa have resulted in its successfuloccupati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an important low marsh niche within westcoast tidal wetlands found in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> California FloristicProvince (and bey<strong>on</strong>d through south-central BajaCalifornia). In fact, as I will argue below, S. foliosa could beviewed as a “foundati<strong>on</strong> species” i.e. a species that has apr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ound effect <strong>on</strong> tidal wetland functi<strong>on</strong>s such assuccessi<strong>on</strong>, productivity, and habitat structure. Thesefuncti<strong>on</strong>s ultimately facilitate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> occupati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> such tidalwetlands by a myriad <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> microbial, algal, plant, invertebrate,fish, and bird species.SPARTINA FOLIOSA AS A FOUNDATION SPECIESThe c<strong>on</strong>cept <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a foundati<strong>on</strong> species has been articulatedby Dayt<strong>on</strong> (1972), Bruno and Bertness (2001), and Bruno etal. (2003) in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>text <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> recognizing facilitati<strong>on</strong> as anessential element <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>temporary ecological <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ory. Unlikekeyst<strong>on</strong>e species, which are proporti<strong>on</strong>ately rare incommunities and yet exert a disproporti<strong>on</strong>ate influence overcommunity structure through processes such as predati<strong>on</strong> orecological engineering, foundati<strong>on</strong> species are habitatformingdominant species that provide <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> framework for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>assembly <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an entire community. California cordgrassappears to be an excellent example <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a foundati<strong>on</strong> species.The importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. foliosa as an initiator <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tidalwetland successi<strong>on</strong> in San Francisco Bay tidal wetlands hasl<strong>on</strong>g been appreciated. For example, Howell (1949) makes<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> following comment: “Pacific (i.e. California) cord grassis generally <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first plant to appear <strong>on</strong> tidal flats where itfrequently establishes broad pure stands. Later it issucceeded by Salicornia and a more diversified salt marshassociati<strong>on</strong> as higher ground is built up around it. In thislater associati<strong>on</strong> Spartina still occurs as a narrow fringeal<strong>on</strong>g tidal sloughs and also occasi<strong>on</strong>ally as a localizedcol<strong>on</strong>y in low areas”. In recently restored tidal wetlands in<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> bay today, such as Carl’s Marsh in S<strong>on</strong>oma County orP<strong>on</strong>d 2A in Napa County, this exact pattern has beenobserved. Spartina foliosa is usually <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first species tocol<strong>on</strong>ize barren mud flats by floating seeds and rhizomefragments. As cl<strong>on</strong>es grow and establish, rhizomatous matstrap sediment and facilitate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> incremental rise <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a marshplain. As elevati<strong>on</strong>s become suitable, o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r vascular plantspecies col<strong>on</strong>ize <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> emerging marsh plain and eventuallydisplace S. foliosa to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> accreting edges <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> marsh,margins <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> drainage channels, or it persists in lowdepressi<strong>on</strong>s in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> marsh where durati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> inundati<strong>on</strong>apparently detracts o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r marsh plain species from becomingestablished (pers<strong>on</strong>al observati<strong>on</strong>).Once established, dense low marsh stands <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. foliosaprovide a key role in marsh productivity. Each year, S.foliosa rhizomes put out fresh shoots that rapidly grow intotall, mature stems and leaves. A c<strong>on</strong>siderable phase <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>carb<strong>on</strong> fixati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n takes place before flowering begins inmid summer (June). After fruiting in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fall, stems die backand much <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> vegetative matter <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> stand c<strong>on</strong>tributes to<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> detritus base <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> wetland food web. Fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r, stemwrack is washed up to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> marsh/upland transiti<strong>on</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e,providing habitat and nutrients for a variety <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> organismsthat inhabit this interface. Al<strong>on</strong>g with this direct c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> wetland food web, S. foliosa also provides animportant indirect c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> because its rhizomatous massprovides key habitat for a diverse assemblage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> algae,including nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria. Daws<strong>on</strong> and Foster(1982) describe this phenomen<strong>on</strong> as follows: “The mudbeneath and between California cord grass is covered withvarious algae, including films <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> golden-colored, unicellulardiatoms, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> brownish-green Enteromorpha, redPolysiph<strong>on</strong>ia, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> brownish-green, siph<strong>on</strong>ous Vaucheria, andblue-green algae. All <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se kinds <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> algae can beimportant c<strong>on</strong>tributors to marsh productivity and, inadditi<strong>on</strong>, some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> blue-greens can c<strong>on</strong>vert nitrogen gasinto o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r nitro-nutrients for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> algae as well as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>flowering plants.”Stands <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. foliosa also provide habitat structure that isimportant for a number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> species that occupy tidalwetlands. The relati<strong>on</strong>ship between California cordgrass andCalifornia and light-footed clapper rails (both subspecies <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>Rallus l<strong>on</strong>girostris) is an excellent case in point. Both forcover and nesting habitat, California cordgrass is essentialfor <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> success <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this species. Boyer and Zedler (1996) alsopoint out that insects occupy stands <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. foliosa and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>seundoubtedly provide food resources for passerine birds (e.g.marsh wrens and s<strong>on</strong>g sparrows) that live in salt marshhabitats.Finally, because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its importance as a foundati<strong>on</strong>species, particularly in terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> successi<strong>on</strong>, S. foliosa is alsoan essential element for tidal wetland restorati<strong>on</strong> projects.Seeds, rhizome fragments, and plugs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. foliosa can beused to revegetate formerly diked wetlands that are restored-5-
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> Spartinato tidal acti<strong>on</strong>. An interesting example is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> restorati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>Muzzi Marsh in Marin County which, because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an alteredhydrology, is still dominated by large meadows <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Californiacordgrass. One <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> goals <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this project was to recoverhabitat for California clapper rails and, indeed, this specieshas col<strong>on</strong>ized Muzzi Marsh and now hosts a thriving,nesting populati<strong>on</strong> (Page and Evens 1987). In San FranciscoBay, it is likely that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. foliosa material in marshrestorati<strong>on</strong> projects will have to be much more carefullyc<strong>on</strong>trolled because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> possibility that hybrid sourcematerial may c<strong>on</strong>taminate seed sources. In fact, <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>greatest challenges <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> invasi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. alterniflora and itsintrogressi<strong>on</strong> with S. foliosa revolves around <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> desperateneed and opportunity to restore historic tidal wetlands inlower San Francisco Bay in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> face <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> potential for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>hybrids to occupy restorati<strong>on</strong> sites and send <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> successi<strong>on</strong>altrajectory into a completely unknown realm.SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS OF HYBRIDIZATIONSpartina foliosa has great significance as a foundati<strong>on</strong>species, shaping <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> structure and functi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> salt marshassemblages within <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> California Floristic Province. Theecological dilemma is that its genetically-compatible sisterspecies, S. alterniflora (Baumel et al. 2002), possessessimilar adaptive traits combined with greater robustness,fertility, and ecological amplitude than S. foliosa.Fortunately, a majority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> range and individualpopulati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. foliosa lie in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sou<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn center <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> itsdistributi<strong>on</strong> from Point Mugu in Orange County throughBahia Magdalena in Baja California. Unfortunately, since70% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> acreage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> salt marsh habitats in Californiaoccurs in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> San Francisco Bay estuary, it is likely that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>largest extant populati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. foliosa are at risk due toc<strong>on</strong>taminati<strong>on</strong> by hybridizati<strong>on</strong>. As pointed out by Daehlerand Str<strong>on</strong>g (1997), Ayres et al. (2003), and Baye (2004),given <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> rapid spread S. foliosa x S. alterniflora hybrids, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>array <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> short form and tall form recombinants, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> malesuperiority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se hybrids (Antilla et al. 1998, 2000), and<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> greater ecological amplitude <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se hybrid genotypes, itis probable that within <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> San Francisco Bay estuary, S.foliosa will ultimately be transformed into a new entity thatcombines traits <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> both S. foliosa and S. alterniflora.Just as S. foliosa is a foundati<strong>on</strong> species in SanFrancisco Bay tidal wetlands, and a myriad <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> species havelife history traits that are adapted to this species, it is likelythat <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrid entity will take its place as a foundati<strong>on</strong>species as well, triggering a cascade <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> resp<strong>on</strong>ses by specieswhose ecological roles are entwined with S. foliosa. It is alsolikely that some species will benefit from this emergenthybrid entity while o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rs will not. These implicati<strong>on</strong>s arecurrently under investigati<strong>on</strong>, as revealed by several papersin this volume. In any case, given <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fact that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrid canspread by wind-born pollen, it is hard to imagine that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>future demography <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. foliosa in San Francisco Bay willnot be influenced by S. alterniflora to some degree. The factthat hybrids appear to be more successful than pure S.alterniflora suggests that S. foliosa is making an importantc<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> adaptive success <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this entity. In thatsense, S. foliosa is not so much going “extinct” as it is beingtransformed into a more fertile and ecologically successfulnew organism that combines traits <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> both species, analternative c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> that Arnold (1997) describes in a morepositive light as “genetic enrichment”.In a review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> role <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> natural hybridizati<strong>on</strong> andevoluti<strong>on</strong>, Arnold (1997) points out that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are both socioculturaland scientific underpinnings to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> view that allhybridizati<strong>on</strong> is “completely maladaptive”. Yet, we arediscovering that hybridizati<strong>on</strong> is an important evoluti<strong>on</strong>arymechanism. Stebbins (1950, 1957) argued that a high degree<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> genetic variability is required for rapid rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> adaptati<strong>on</strong>and speciati<strong>on</strong>. His idea was that genetic recombinati<strong>on</strong> fromhybridizati<strong>on</strong> between differently adapted species, ra<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rthan mutati<strong>on</strong>, is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> most likely source <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> such variati<strong>on</strong>.The challenge for hybrid speciati<strong>on</strong> under natural c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>sis to (1) produce a fit recombinant and (2) keep thisgenotype intact in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> face <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> potential genetic swamping by<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> parents (Arnold 1996, Rieseberg 1997, Turelli et al.2001). The hybridizati<strong>on</strong> event between S. foliosa and S.alterniflora has been mediated by human causes ra<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r thanshifting climate or some o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r “natural” event. As a result,<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> more robust but perhaps less locally adapted S.alterniflora does not exist in high enough numbers to swampout <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrid. On <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r hand, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> far more abundant andlocally adaptive S. foliosa appears to lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pollen fertilityto swamp out <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> invading hybrids (Antilla et al. 1998).What seems to be happening is that S. alterniflora genes areintrogressing into S. foliosa populati<strong>on</strong>s faster than pure S.alterniflora individuals are col<strong>on</strong>izing o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r parts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> bay(Antilla et al. 2000). In that sense, over many generati<strong>on</strong>s, ifpure S. alterniflora can be c<strong>on</strong>strained or even eradicated, itis more likely that S. foliosa will assimilate S. alternifloragenes into its populati<strong>on</strong>s than <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>trary (i.e. S.alterniflora genes are introgressing into pure S. foliosapopulati<strong>on</strong>s). Ultimately, fertile recombinant genotypesappear to be poised to generate a new evoluti<strong>on</strong>ary unitwithin San Francisco Bay whose ultimate fate and impact <strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ecology <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> wetlands <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this estuary, and elsewhere,are both unknown and potentially bey<strong>on</strong>d our c<strong>on</strong>trol.While it is still possible, <strong>on</strong>e questi<strong>on</strong> should beaddressed that could have legal implicati<strong>on</strong>s for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> potentialmanagement <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this situati<strong>on</strong>. That is, is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re any evidencethat <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nor<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn S. foliosa populati<strong>on</strong>s are geneticallydistinct from sou<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn populati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this species? If it couldbe established that nor<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn populati<strong>on</strong>s represent a distinctpopulati<strong>on</strong> segment, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n <strong>on</strong>e could make <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> case that SanFrancisco Bay area S. foliosa should be protected under <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>Endangered Species Act. How that might be d<strong>on</strong>e is wellbey<strong>on</strong>d <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> scope <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this paper, but it might help focus astrategy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tainment and c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. foliosa that-6-
- Page 2 and 3: Proceedings <stron
- Page 4 and 5: FORWARD & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe <stro
- Page 6 and 7: TABLE OF CONTENTSForward & Acknowle
- Page 9 and 10: Community Spartina Education and St
- Page 11 and 12: included the docum
- Page 14: CHAPTER ONESpartina Biology
- Page 17: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 21 and 22: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 28 and 29: Proceedings <stron
- Page 30 and 31: Proceedings <stron
- Page 32 and 33: Proceedings <stron
- Page 34: Proceedings <stron
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 42 and 43: Proceedings <stron
- Page 44: Proceedings <stron
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 49 and 50: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 60 and 61: Proceedings <stron
- Page 62 and 63: Proceedings <stron
- Page 64 and 65: Proceedings <stron
- Page 66: Proceedings <stron
- Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 74 and 75:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 76:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 81 and 82:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 83 and 84:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 86 and 87:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 88 and 89:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 90 and 91:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 92 and 93:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 94 and 95:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 96 and 97:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 98:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 108 and 109:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 110:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 113 and 114:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 115 and 116:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 122 and 123:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 124 and 125:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 126 and 127:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 128:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 134 and 135:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 136 and 137:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 138 and 139:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 140:
CHAPTER THREEEcosystem Effects <str
- Page 143 and 144:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 145 and 146:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 148 and 149:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 150 and 151:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 152:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 155 and 156:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 160 and 161:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 162 and 163:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 164:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 167 and 168:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 171 and 172:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 174 and 175:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 176:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 179 and 180:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 181 and 182:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 184 and 185:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 186 and 187:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 188 and 189:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 190 and 191:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 192 and 193:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 194 and 195:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 196:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 199 and 200:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 201 and 202:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 204 and 205:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 206 and 207:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 208 and 209:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 210 and 211:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 212:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 216 and 217:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 218 and 219:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 220 and 221:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 222 and 223:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 224 and 225:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 226 and 227:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 228 and 229:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 230 and 231:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 232 and 233:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 234 and 235:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 236 and 237:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 238 and 239:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 240 and 241:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 242 and 243:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 244 and 245:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 246:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 249 and 250:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 251 and 252:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 253 and 254:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 255 and 256:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 257 and 258:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 259 and 260:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 261 and 262:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 263 and 264:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 265 and 266:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 267 and 268:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 269 and 270:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 271 and 272:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 273 and 274:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 276 and 277:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 278 and 279:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 280 and 281:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 282 and 283:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 284 and 285:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 286 and 287:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 288 and 289:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 290:
Proceedings <stron