<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaChapter 1: Spartina BiologySPARTINA DENSIFLORA X FOLIOSA HYBRIDS FOUND IN SAN FRANCISCO BAYD.R. Ayres 1 and A.K.F. Lee 2Dept. <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Evoluti<strong>on</strong> and Ecology, University <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 956161 drayres@ucdavis.edu;2 alexkinlee@gmail.comKeywords: <strong>Invasive</strong> Spartina, hybridizati<strong>on</strong>, polyploidyINTRODUCTIONIn <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1970s, Spartina densiflora and S. foliosa wereplanted during <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> restorati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Creekside Park in MarinCounty to a tidal salt marsh. In 2001 we discoveredcordgrass plants that spread by rhizomes like S. foliosa, buthad dense, evergreen stems like S. densiflora. Spartinafoliosa, California cordgrass, is native to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> state. Plantsgrow laterally by rhizomes, creating meadows <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sparse,evenly-spaced, deciduous stems. The species occupies lowertidal envir<strong>on</strong>ments (above mean sea level to mean highwater). Spartina densiflora, dense-flowered cordgrass, isnative to South America. Lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> rhizomes create a bunchtypegrass, with dense, largely evergreen stems. The speciesoccupies higher tidal areas than S. foliosa, occurring withSarcocornia viginica. The intermediate appearance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>Creekside Park plants suggested that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> two species hadhybridized.MOLECULAR AND CYTOLOGICAL DYNAMICS OF S.DENSIFLORA X FOLIOSA HYBRIDSWe developed and used RAPD (Random AmplifiedPolymorphic DNA) nuclear DNA markers specific to ei<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rS. foliosa or S. densiflora to identify and type hybrids (F1 orintrogressed). We used species-specific chloroplast DNAsequences (Anttila et al. 2000) to determine <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> maternalparent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrid plants, as chloroplasts are maternallyinherited in Spartina (Ferris et al. 1997). Chromosomenumbers in root tips were counted in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> parental species andin seven hybrid plants. We estimated genome size in mostplants using flow cytometry (Grotkopp 2004; Galbraith1982), compared <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> genome sizes with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> corresp<strong>on</strong>dingchromosome counts, and used genome size to rapidly assess<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ploidy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrids (see Ayres et al. 2008 for details).We found 35 hybrid plants. All exhibited a F1 pattern<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> nuclear bands; that is, generally <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y c<strong>on</strong>tained all 13 S.densiflora-specific bands and all nine S. foliosa-specificbands. A few plants lacked <strong>on</strong>e or two bands. Most plants(17 out <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 20 analyzed) had S. densiflora cpDNA. Mosthybrids were intermediate between S. densiflora and S.foliosa in chromosome number and genome size (Table 1);both chromosome number and genome size are c<strong>on</strong>sistentwith haploid gametes <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> each parental species (31 from S.foliosa + 35 from S. densiflora) uniting to form a F1 hybridwith 66 chromosomes. However, two plants were triploids,with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> cp DNA <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. foliosa. Chromosome counts andgenome size assessments are c<strong>on</strong>sistent with a 2nc<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> by S. foliosa and a 1n c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> by S.densiflora, with loss <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>e and three chromosomes,respectively, in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> two triploid individuals. Due tochromosomal mis-matching, viable gamete formati<strong>on</strong> isprobably rare in all hybrids. Even so, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> triploidplants is important as it indicates that several avenues existTable 1. Molecular and cytological dynamics <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. densiflora x foliosa hybrids.Type/number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrids(RAPDs)S. foliosa S. densiflora 2n hybrids 3n hybrids33 F1 2 F1cp DNA Sf Sd 17 Sd: 1 Sf 2 Sf : 0 SdChromosome number 62 70 65/66 94/96Genome size- pg (SD) 4.46 (SD= 0.10) 5.16 (SD = 0.06) 4.83 (SD = 0.06) 7.0 (SD = 0.01)Chromosome math 31 (S.f. 1n) + 35 (S.d. 1n) = 66 (S.d x f 2n)Triploid math 62 (S.f. 2n) + 35 (S.d. 1n) - (1 or 3 chromosomes) = 94 or 96 (S.d x f 3n)Genome size math {0.5 *4.46 (S.f. 2n)} + {0.5 *5.16 (S.d. 2n)} = 4.81 pg (S.d x f 2n)Triploid math {1*4.46 (S. f. 2n)} + {0.5 *5.16 (S.d. 2n)} = 7.0 pg (S.d x f 3n)-37-
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaFig. 1. Final aboveground biomass <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> some plants in greenhouse salinityexperiment. CS-17 and CS-19 (diploid plants) are some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> transgressivehybrids, while CS-15 (triploid plant) has performance comparable to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>parental species under <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same high salinity stress.which may give rise to a new alloployploid species. Thus,this new hybridizati<strong>on</strong> possibly <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fers us a chance to observe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> origin <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a new species.ECOLOGY OF S. DENSIFLORA X FOLIOSA HYBRIDSThis is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sec<strong>on</strong>d Spartina hybridizati<strong>on</strong> in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> SanFrancisco estuary in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> past three decades; <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r,between S. alterniflora x foliosa, has resulted in abackcrossing swarm <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> invasive hybrids. Introducti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>Spartina have resulted in major biological invasi<strong>on</strong>s in saltmarshes around <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> world. Two <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se invaders arehybrids between native and introduced species (S.alterniflora x foliosa; S. anglica). Given <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> history <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>Spartina invasi<strong>on</strong>s and hybridizati<strong>on</strong>s, we investigatedwhe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r S. densiflora x foliosa hybrids have <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> potential tospread and invade surrounding marshes in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Bay. Thiswould require that hybrids tolerate marsh salinity and tidalinundati<strong>on</strong>, and produce viable seed. A greenhouseexperiment was performed with ten hybrid genotypes toassess <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir salinity tolerance against <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> parental species (S.foliosa – low elevati<strong>on</strong>, low salinity; and S. densiflora –higher elevati<strong>on</strong>, higher salinity). Salinity was increased by10 parts per thousand per week (ppt/week), and wemeasured several fitness indicators for 10 weeks. In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>field, we combined mapping data with elevati<strong>on</strong>almeasurements (using a Trimble Total Stati<strong>on</strong>) to determine<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> relative tidal elevati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrids, native species, and S.densiflora. We also collected inflorescences from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fieldto measure <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir reproducti<strong>on</strong> (seed set).We found that some hybrids have high salinity tolerancebased <strong>on</strong> final aboveground biomass and flower producti<strong>on</strong>at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10 weeks (Fig. 1). Tolerance to high salinitycould allow hybrids to grow in higher marsh envir<strong>on</strong>ments,largely occupied by Sarcocornia virginica. Hybrids had anelevati<strong>on</strong>al range similar to S. densiflora at Creekside Park.Spartina foliosa occupies <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lowest range, while <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>dominant Sarcocornia virginica is found in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> highest. Thehybrids occupy <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same “middle” range as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir S.densiflora parent, which suggests that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrids might nottolerate tidal inundati<strong>on</strong> as well as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir S. foliosa parent.Finally, hybrids set no seed.SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONSWe found that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> salinity tolerance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybridgenotypes exceeded that <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> both parental species; thathybrids occurred higher in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> marsh than S. foliosa andwithin a narrower elevati<strong>on</strong> range than ei<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r parentalspecies; and hybrids were apparently sterile as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>yproduced no seed in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> field and produced <strong>on</strong>ly shriveledan<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rs in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> greenhouse experiment. We c<strong>on</strong>clude thatdespite hybrid superiority in salinity tolerance, S. densiflorax foliosa hybrids will not be invasive due to sterility. Evenso, sterility may be overcome if fertile tetraploids orhexaploids evolve from hybrid individuals.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSWe would like to thank Krista Callinan (field andgreenhouse experiment), Carina Anttila (cpDNA), JohnBailey (cytology), Eva Grotkopp (flow cytometry), PabloRosso (GIS) and acknowledge <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> financial support from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>California Coastal C<strong>on</strong>servancy (CalFed grant #99-110),California Sea Grant #27CN to D.R. Str<strong>on</strong>g, and NSFBiocomplexity DEB 0083583 to A. Hastings and D.R.Str<strong>on</strong>g.REFERENCESAnttila, C.K., A.R. King, C. Ferris, D.R. Ayres and D.R. Str<strong>on</strong>g.2000. Reciprocal hybrid formati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartina in San FranciscoBay. Molecular Ecology 9: 765-771.Ayres, D.R., E. Grotkopp, K. Zaremba, et al. 2008. Hybridizati<strong>on</strong>between invasive Spartina densiflora (Poaceae) and native S. foliosain San Francisco Bay, California, USA. American Journal<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Botany 95(6): 713–719.Ayres, D.R., D. Garcia-Rossi, H.G. Davis and D.R. Str<strong>on</strong>g. 1999.Extent and degree <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybridizati<strong>on</strong> between exotic (Spartina alterniflora)and native (S. foliosa) cordgrass (Poaceae) in California,USA determined by random amplified polymorphic DNA(RAPDs). Molecular Ecology 8: 1179-1186.Ferris, C., R.A. King and A.J. Gray. 1997. Molecular evidence for<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> maternal parentage in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> hybrid origin <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartina anglicaC.E. Hubbard. Molecular Ecology 6: 185-187.Grotkopp, E., M. Rejmanek, M.J. Sanders<strong>on</strong> and T.L. Rost. 2004.Evoluti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> genome size in pines (Pinus) and its life-history correlates:supertree analyses. Evoluti<strong>on</strong> 58:1705-1729.Galbraith, D.W., K.R. Harkins, J.M. Maddox, N.M. Ayres, D.P.Sharma and E. Firoozabady. 1983. Rapid flow cytometric analysis<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220: 1049-1051.-38-
- Page 2 and 3: Proceedings <stron
- Page 4 and 5: FORWARD & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe <stro
- Page 6 and 7: TABLE OF CONTENTSForward & Acknowle
- Page 9 and 10: Community Spartina Education and St
- Page 11 and 12: included the docum
- Page 14: CHAPTER ONESpartina Biology
- Page 17 and 18: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 21 and 22: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 28 and 29: Proceedings <stron
- Page 30 and 31: Proceedings <stron
- Page 32 and 33: Proceedings <stron
- Page 34: Proceedings <stron
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 42 and 43: Proceedings <stron
- Page 44: Proceedings <stron
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 49: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 60 and 61: Proceedings <stron
- Page 62 and 63: Proceedings <stron
- Page 64 and 65: Proceedings <stron
- Page 66: Proceedings <stron
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 74 and 75: Proceedings <stron
- Page 76: Proceedings <stron
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 86 and 87: Proceedings <stron
- Page 88 and 89: Proceedings <stron
- Page 90 and 91: Proceedings <stron
- Page 92 and 93: Proceedings <stron
- Page 94 and 95: Proceedings <stron
- Page 96 and 97: Proceedings <stron
- Page 98: Proceedings <stron
- Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 108 and 109:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 110:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 113 and 114:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 115 and 116:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 122 and 123:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 124 and 125:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 126 and 127:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 128:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 134 and 135:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 136 and 137:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 138 and 139:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 140:
CHAPTER THREEEcosystem Effects <str
- Page 143 and 144:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 145 and 146:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 148 and 149:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 150 and 151:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 152:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 155 and 156:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 160 and 161:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 162 and 163:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 164:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 167 and 168:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 171 and 172:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 174 and 175:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 176:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 179 and 180:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 181 and 182:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 184 and 185:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 186 and 187:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 188 and 189:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 190 and 191:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 192 and 193:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 194 and 195:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 196:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 199 and 200:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 201 and 202:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 204 and 205:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 206 and 207:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 208 and 209:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 210 and 211:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 212:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 216 and 217:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 218 and 219:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 220 and 221:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 222 and 223:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 224 and 225:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 226 and 227:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 228 and 229:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 230 and 231:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 232 and 233:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 234 and 235:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 236 and 237:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 238 and 239:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 240 and 241:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 242 and 243:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 244 and 245:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 246:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 249 and 250:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 251 and 252:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 253 and 254:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 255 and 256:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 257 and 258:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 259 and 260:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 261 and 262:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 263 and 264:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 265 and 266:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 267 and 268:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 269 and 270:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 271 and 272:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 273 and 274:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 276 and 277:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 278 and 279:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 280 and 281:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 282 and 283:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 284 and 285:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 286 and 287:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 288 and 289:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 290:
Proceedings <stron