<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaChapter 4: Spartina C<strong>on</strong>trol and Managementab% survival% survival100806040200100806040200San Francisco3 day 15 day 3 day 15 daysmallWillapa Baylarge3 day 8 day 15 day 3 day 8 day 15 daysmalllargeFig. 4: Percent fragment survival 132 days after planting <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. alterniflorafrom a) San Francisco and b) Willapa Bay. White = 0 ppt, striped = 15 ppt,black = 35 ppt. All fragments represented here were planted with at least<strong>on</strong>e attached culm.The proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> surviving fragments per treatmentgroup stabilized by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> growing period (Fig. 3).For San Francisco (SF) plants, survival 132 days afterplanting ranged from 45-100% in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> freshwater treatments,55-90.0% in 15 ppt water and 0 to 5.56% in 35 ppt water.For WB plants, survival ranged from 26.3-81.8% in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>freshwater treatments, 27.8-88.9% in 15 ppt water and0-11.1% in 35 ppt water.For nearly all SF groups, rhizome fragments immersedfor 3 days prior to planting showed lower rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> survivalthan those immersed for 15 days (Figure 4). The samepattern emerged with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> WB 15 ppt fragments where <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>three-day immersi<strong>on</strong> groups showed much lower survivalthan <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> eight-day immersi<strong>on</strong> groups. Large rhizomefragments c<strong>on</strong>sistently had higher viability than smallrhizome fragments. For SF plants, 80.3% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> large fragmentssurvived compared to <strong>on</strong>ly 62.5% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> small fragments.For WB plants, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> difference was more pr<strong>on</strong>ounced with74.8% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> large and 36.2% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> small fragments surviving. SFand WB populati<strong>on</strong>s were compared using a two-tailed test<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> two proporti<strong>on</strong>s; <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re were significant differencesbetween <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proporti<strong>on</strong>s surviving in both freshwater (72.5%vs. 55.5%, respectively, p=0.012, α=0.05) and 15 ppt water(70.1% vs. 56.0%, p=0.043, α=0.05). In both <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>secomparis<strong>on</strong>s, SF fragments had higher survivorship. Therewas no notable difference between survival rates for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> twoTable 2: Summary data for two m<strong>on</strong>ths <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> drift card releases from three S.alterniflora infested bays.Release Date Willapa HumboldtSeptember 2004SanFranciscoRecovery Rate 57.5% 21.5% 30.5%Quantity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> recovered cardsNorthSouthInside bayMax distance traveled (km)NorthSouthOctober 20047934295351031275651219304520Recovery Rate 29.5% 0.5% 24.0%Quantity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> recovered cardsNorthSouthInside bayMax distance traveled (km)NorthSouth563022335locati<strong>on</strong>s (3.9% vs. 5.1%) in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> high salinity treatment (p=0.691, α=0.05).PROPAGULE DISPERSAL STUDYDrift card return rates have been over 20% for five <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> six releases performed as <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> November 11, 2004 (Table2). Cards have c<strong>on</strong>sistently been found both to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> north andsouth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> each release locati<strong>on</strong>. In four <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> six releasesperformed to date, cards have been found inside <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>estuaries. The majority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cards are staying within 25 km <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> release locati<strong>on</strong>s, although a few have traveled l<strong>on</strong>gerdistances.In Willapa Bay, over 69% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> September releasecards and 95% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> October release cards were found to<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> north <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> bay. Maximum northward velocities forSeptember and October releases were 6.9 and 11.2centimeters per sec<strong>on</strong>d (cm/s) respectively, while maximumsouthward velocities reached 6.7 and 3.4 cm/s.In Humboldt Bay, approximately 72% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Septembercards were carried south. Maximum velocity for Septemberrelease was approximately 3.4 cm/s both to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> north andsouth. Only <strong>on</strong>e card, found after six days approximately sixkm north <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Humboldt Bay entrance, was recovered fromHumboldt’s October release.1006na64117530- 259 -
Chapter 4: Spartina C<strong>on</strong>trol and Management<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaThe highest number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cards found within an estuaryoccurred in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> case <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> San Francisco September releasewhen thirty cards were recovered <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> eastern edge <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>bay, mainly near <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Berkeley and Albany shoreline.Observed winds at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> time <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> that release were from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>west at approximately 7.7 – 10.3 m/s. Recoveries <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> SanFrancisco cards not blown back into <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> bay after <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>September release showed 61% were carried south.Maximum velocities for this release were approximately 2.4cm/s to both <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> north and south. Eighty-seven percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>October cards were found to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> south. Maximum velocitieswere 5.4 cm/s to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> north and 6.9 cm/s to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> south.DISCUSSIONRototilling appears to have fairly uniform cutting acti<strong>on</strong><strong>on</strong> solid meadows; it produces rhizome fragments <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>c<strong>on</strong>sistent size and with similar numbers <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> attached culms.A high percentage (87.8%) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. alterniflora fragmentsproduced by rototilling in Willapa Bay had at least <strong>on</strong>eattached culm. The observed difference in culm length andrhizome diameter between quadrats was likely a result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>variati<strong>on</strong>s in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> age <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> coalesced cl<strong>on</strong>es, ra<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r thanvariable tearing acti<strong>on</strong> by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> tilling blades. Assuminguniformity in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> producti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> rhizome fragments(approximately 312 fragments/m 2 within <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> top 10 cm) wecould make a c<strong>on</strong>servative estimate that 0.5% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fragmentsmight be loosened by wave or tidal acti<strong>on</strong>, becomingsuspended in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> water column. Based <strong>on</strong> those assumpti<strong>on</strong>s,as many as 15,600 fragments might be distributed in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>open water for every hectare rototilled (~6,300 per acre).Viability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> rhizomes after floating at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> water surfaceseems to be primarily dependent <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> at least<strong>on</strong>e culm. Randall and Milne (unpublished) found thatrhizome fragments 2.5 to 15 cm l<strong>on</strong>g with no attached culmshad 100% mortality regardless <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> positi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mud-flatsubstrate or beneath it at various depths. The presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>attached culms should allow <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fragment to respire and<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>reby increase its chance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> survival. In fact, repeatedmowing to remove vegetative shoots caused a reducti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>oxygen to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> root system and was initially utilized as ac<strong>on</strong>trol method for Spartina (Ebasco Envir<strong>on</strong>mental 1993;Hedge et al. 1997). Of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 116 rhizomes planted withoutattached culms during <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> greenhouse study, n<strong>on</strong>e survived.Compared to fragments planted with culms, this findingseems to support <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ory that at least <strong>on</strong>e vegetative shootis needed for survival <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> vegetative propagules.For fragments having culms, salinity and initial rhizomesize determined survival. The 35 ppt treatment resulted innotably poorer survival rates compared to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lower salinitytreatments. Differences in 0 ppt and 15 ppt treatmentsappeared largely due to initial rhizome size. Larger rhizomeswould logically have higher chances <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> survival since <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ywould be likely to have more nodes, a greater number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>established roots and more n<strong>on</strong>-structural carbohydrates t<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>uel new growth.The length <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> immersi<strong>on</strong> was a less importantdeterminant <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> survival and establishment or rhizomefragments than salinity or rhizome size. L<strong>on</strong>ger immersi<strong>on</strong>durati<strong>on</strong>s may increase viability, although this effect was notc<strong>on</strong>sistent. Three to four m<strong>on</strong>ths <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> wet, cool c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s mayhelp break seed dormancy and increase germinati<strong>on</strong> rates byleaching a germinati<strong>on</strong> inhibitor. Similarly, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>sthat fragments are exposed to while floating in open watermay retard growth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pathogens, encourage shoot producti<strong>on</strong>or el<strong>on</strong>gati<strong>on</strong> or o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rwise increase chances <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> survival.Repeated m<strong>on</strong>itoring <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> treated sites in Willapa Bay hasshown that mechanical treatments such as rototilling anddisking have higher efficacy during <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> period <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Decemberthrough February (Patten & Stenvall 2002). All <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> plantsused for this study were collected four to five weeks after <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>normal rototilling period in Willapa Bay. Increased culmlength, as well as higher air, soil and water temperatures at<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> time <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> collecti<strong>on</strong>, may have increased survival rates.Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> vigorous acti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> rototilling producesmore ragged edges and somewhat damaged culms than werereproduced in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> greenhouse. This might also elevate rates<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> survival shown here.Preliminary results from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first two m<strong>on</strong>ths <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> driftcard study suggest propagule depositi<strong>on</strong> from infestedestuaries lessens with increased distance. Flow over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>coastal shelf is predominantly poleward in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> winter andearly spring, with mean current velocities <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 20 cm/s.Summertime flow is typically southward with meanvelocities <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10 cm/s. Dispersal patterns seen from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>sepreliminary findings may be due to a seas<strong>on</strong>al transiti<strong>on</strong>period between <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se predominant currents. Recoverypatterns may also reflect wind forcing and local eddies from<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mouths <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> release estuaries. Frequent recoveries inbeaches al<strong>on</strong>g L<strong>on</strong>g Beach peninsula, where Spartina wrackis comm<strong>on</strong>ly found in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fall, suggests that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> cardssimulate wrack dispersal with some accuracy.CONCLUSIONSThe estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 15,600 fragments per hectare may seeminc<strong>on</strong>sequential when compared to estimates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> seedgerminati<strong>on</strong> rates for S. alterniflora which range from nineto nineteen milli<strong>on</strong> seeds per hectare (3.7 milli<strong>on</strong> to 7.7milli<strong>on</strong> seeds per acre) (Callaway 1990; Daehler and Str<strong>on</strong>g1994). However, understanding <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> risks associated with allc<strong>on</strong>trol methods is necessary when site-specific treatmentdecisi<strong>on</strong>s are made. Rototilling or o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r mechanicaldisturbance that produces fragments larger than 2.5 cmshould be used with cauti<strong>on</strong> in areas with fresh tomoderately brackish (mesohaline) waters. Mechanicaldisturbance following some o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r treatment method, such asherbicide applicati<strong>on</strong>, may pose less <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a risk <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> starting new- 260 -
- Page 2 and 3:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 4 and 5:
FORWARD & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe <stro
- Page 6 and 7:
TABLE OF CONTENTSForward & Acknowle
- Page 9 and 10:
Community Spartina Education and St
- Page 11 and 12:
included the docum
- Page 14:
CHAPTER ONESpartina Biology
- Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 28 and 29:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 30 and 31:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 32 and 33:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 34:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 42 and 43:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 44:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 47 and 48:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 49 and 50:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 55 and 56:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 57 and 58:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 60 and 61:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 62 and 63:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 64 and 65:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 66:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 74 and 75:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 76:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 81 and 82:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 83 and 84:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 86 and 87:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 88 and 89:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 90 and 91:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 92 and 93:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 94 and 95:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 96 and 97:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 98:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 108 and 109:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 110:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 113 and 114:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 115 and 116:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 122 and 123:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 124 and 125:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 126 and 127:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 128:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 134 and 135:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 136 and 137:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 138 and 139:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 140:
CHAPTER THREEEcosystem Effects <str
- Page 143 and 144:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 145 and 146:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 148 and 149:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 150 and 151:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 152:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 155 and 156:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 160 and 161:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 162 and 163:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 164:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 167 and 168:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 171 and 172:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 174 and 175:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 176:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 179 and 180:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 181 and 182:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 184 and 185:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 186 and 187:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 188 and 189:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 190 and 191:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 192 and 193:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 194 and 195:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 196:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 199 and 200:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 201 and 202:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 204 and 205:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 206 and 207:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 208 and 209:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 210 and 211:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 212:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 216 and 217:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 218 and 219:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 220 and 221:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 222 and 223: Proceedings <stron
- Page 224 and 225: Proceedings <stron
- Page 226 and 227: Proceedings <stron
- Page 228 and 229: Proceedings <stron
- Page 230 and 231: Proceedings <stron
- Page 232 and 233: Proceedings <stron
- Page 234 and 235: Proceedings <stron
- Page 236 and 237: Proceedings <stron
- Page 238 and 239: Proceedings <stron
- Page 240 and 241: Proceedings <stron
- Page 242 and 243: Proceedings <stron
- Page 244 and 245: Proceedings <stron
- Page 246: Proceedings <stron
- Page 249 and 250: Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 251 and 252: Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 253 and 254: Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 255 and 256: Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 257 and 258: Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 259 and 260: Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 261 and 262: Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 263 and 264: Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 265 and 266: Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 267 and 268: Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 269 and 270: Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 271: Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 276 and 277: Proceedings <stron
- Page 278 and 279: Proceedings <stron
- Page 280 and 281: Proceedings <stron
- Page 282 and 283: Proceedings <stron
- Page 284 and 285: Proceedings <stron
- Page 286 and 287: Proceedings <stron
- Page 288 and 289: Proceedings <stron
- Page 290: Proceedings <stron