12.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Invasive ...

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Invasive ...

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Invasive ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaChapter 4: Spartina C<strong>on</strong>trol and Managementab% survival% survival100806040200100806040200San Francisco3 day 15 day 3 day 15 daysmallWillapa Baylarge3 day 8 day 15 day 3 day 8 day 15 daysmalllargeFig. 4: Percent fragment survival 132 days after planting <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. alterniflorafrom a) San Francisco and b) Willapa Bay. White = 0 ppt, striped = 15 ppt,black = 35 ppt. All fragments represented here were planted with at least<strong>on</strong>e attached culm.The proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> surviving fragments per treatmentgroup stabilized by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> growing period (Fig. 3).For San Francisco (SF) plants, survival 132 days afterplanting ranged from 45-100% in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> freshwater treatments,55-90.0% in 15 ppt water and 0 to 5.56% in 35 ppt water.For WB plants, survival ranged from 26.3-81.8% in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>freshwater treatments, 27.8-88.9% in 15 ppt water and0-11.1% in 35 ppt water.For nearly all SF groups, rhizome fragments immersedfor 3 days prior to planting showed lower rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> survivalthan those immersed for 15 days (Figure 4). The samepattern emerged with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> WB 15 ppt fragments where <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>three-day immersi<strong>on</strong> groups showed much lower survivalthan <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> eight-day immersi<strong>on</strong> groups. Large rhizomefragments c<strong>on</strong>sistently had higher viability than smallrhizome fragments. For SF plants, 80.3% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> large fragmentssurvived compared to <strong>on</strong>ly 62.5% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> small fragments.For WB plants, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> difference was more pr<strong>on</strong>ounced with74.8% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> large and 36.2% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> small fragments surviving. SFand WB populati<strong>on</strong>s were compared using a two-tailed test<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> two proporti<strong>on</strong>s; <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re were significant differencesbetween <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proporti<strong>on</strong>s surviving in both freshwater (72.5%vs. 55.5%, respectively, p=0.012, α=0.05) and 15 ppt water(70.1% vs. 56.0%, p=0.043, α=0.05). In both <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>secomparis<strong>on</strong>s, SF fragments had higher survivorship. Therewas no notable difference between survival rates for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> twoTable 2: Summary data for two m<strong>on</strong>ths <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> drift card releases from three S.alterniflora infested bays.Release Date Willapa HumboldtSeptember 2004SanFranciscoRecovery Rate 57.5% 21.5% 30.5%Quantity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> recovered cardsNorthSouthInside bayMax distance traveled (km)NorthSouthOctober 20047934295351031275651219304520Recovery Rate 29.5% 0.5% 24.0%Quantity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> recovered cardsNorthSouthInside bayMax distance traveled (km)NorthSouth563022335locati<strong>on</strong>s (3.9% vs. 5.1%) in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> high salinity treatment (p=0.691, α=0.05).PROPAGULE DISPERSAL STUDYDrift card return rates have been over 20% for five <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> six releases performed as <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> November 11, 2004 (Table2). Cards have c<strong>on</strong>sistently been found both to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> north andsouth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> each release locati<strong>on</strong>. In four <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> six releasesperformed to date, cards have been found inside <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>estuaries. The majority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cards are staying within 25 km <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> release locati<strong>on</strong>s, although a few have traveled l<strong>on</strong>gerdistances.In Willapa Bay, over 69% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> September releasecards and 95% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> October release cards were found to<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> north <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> bay. Maximum northward velocities forSeptember and October releases were 6.9 and 11.2centimeters per sec<strong>on</strong>d (cm/s) respectively, while maximumsouthward velocities reached 6.7 and 3.4 cm/s.In Humboldt Bay, approximately 72% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Septembercards were carried south. Maximum velocity for Septemberrelease was approximately 3.4 cm/s both to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> north andsouth. Only <strong>on</strong>e card, found after six days approximately sixkm north <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Humboldt Bay entrance, was recovered fromHumboldt’s October release.1006na64117530- 259 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!