<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaChapter 1: Spartina BiologyLOCAL AND GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN SPARTINA-HERBIVORE INTERACTIONSS.C. PENNINGSDepartment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Biology and Biochemistry, University <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Houst<strong>on</strong>, Houst<strong>on</strong> TX 77204; spennings@uh.eduSpartina alterniflora is c<strong>on</strong>sumed by a variety <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> herbivores, and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nature <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se plant-herbivoreinteracti<strong>on</strong>s varies <strong>on</strong> both local and geographic scales. The palatability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. alterniflora toherbivores varies within single marshes as a functi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> elevati<strong>on</strong>. Tall-form plants, which occur atlow elevati<strong>on</strong>s close to creek banks, are more palatable to herbivores than are short-form plants,which occur at middle elevati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> marsh platform. The proximate causes <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this localvariati<strong>on</strong> in palatability include variati<strong>on</strong> in leaf nitrogen c<strong>on</strong>tent and chemical defenses.Differences in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se leaf traits are driven by variati<strong>on</strong> in sediment biogeochemistry across <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>elevati<strong>on</strong>al gradient. The palatability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. alterniflora to herbivores also varies geographically.High-latitude (New England) plants al<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Atlantic Coast <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> United States are more palatableto herbivores than are low-latitude (South Atlantic Bight) plants. The proximate causes <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> thislatitudinal variati<strong>on</strong> in palatability include variati<strong>on</strong> in leaf nitrogen c<strong>on</strong>tent, toughness, andchemical defenses. Differences in palatability and leaf traits persisted over 5 cl<strong>on</strong>al generati<strong>on</strong>s in acomm<strong>on</strong>-garden greenhouse envir<strong>on</strong>ment, and thus are probably genetically determined. A number<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> processes may c<strong>on</strong>tribute to driving this variati<strong>on</strong> in leaf traits. The most likely ultimate causesare latitudinal variati<strong>on</strong> in herbivore pressure and latitudinal variati<strong>on</strong> in plant phenology.Understanding spatial variati<strong>on</strong> in interacti<strong>on</strong>s between herbivores and S. alterniflora within itsnative range may shed insights into how <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se interacti<strong>on</strong>s develop when S. alterniflora isintroduced to new regi<strong>on</strong>s, and may inform bioc<strong>on</strong>trol efforts.Keywords: comm<strong>on</strong>-garden experiment, elevati<strong>on</strong>, herbivory, latitude, leaf traits, salt marsh,Spartina alternifloraINTRODUCTIONEarly salt-marsh studies discounted <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>herbivory to salt marsh ecology because herbivores did notappear to play a major role in energy flow through <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> marshfood web (Smalley 1960; Teal 1962). More recent work,however, has shown that herbivores can affect <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> biomass,distributi<strong>on</strong>s and reproducti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a variety <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> salt marshplants (Srivastava and Jefferies 1996; Bortolus and Iribarne1999; Pennings and Bertness 2001; Silliman and Zieman2001; Rand 2003; Silliman and Bortolus 2003; Ho andPennings 2008). Thus, a general understanding <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ecology <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> salt-marsh plants requires c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> plan<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rbivoreinteracti<strong>on</strong>s.In order to obtain a general understanding <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> plan<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rbivoreinteracti<strong>on</strong>s, it is necessary to c<strong>on</strong>sider spatialvariati<strong>on</strong>. Even within <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> limited c<strong>on</strong>fines <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> salt marshhabitats, interacti<strong>on</strong>s between plants and herbivores are notexactly <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same everywhere. They vary with marshelevati<strong>on</strong> (Silliman and Bertness 2002; Gorans<strong>on</strong> et al.2004), local plant community compositi<strong>on</strong> (Rand 1999,2003, 2004), and latitude (Pennings et al. 2001; Penningsand Silliman 2005; Pennings et al. 2007). Thus, a generalunderstanding <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> plant-herbivore interacti<strong>on</strong>s in salt marshesmust incorporate spatial variati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> a variety <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> scales.Here, I address variati<strong>on</strong> in interacti<strong>on</strong>s betweenherbivores and Spartina alterniflora at local and geographicscales. At <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> local scale I focus <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> intertidal gradientacross <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> marsh. Al<strong>on</strong>g this gradient, soil biogeochemistryvaries markedly, producing str<strong>on</strong>g variati<strong>on</strong> in plantmorphology and palatability to herbivores. At <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>geographic scale I focus <strong>on</strong> latitudinal variati<strong>on</strong> al<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>Atlantic Coast <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> United States. Latitudinal differencesin palatability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> salt marsh plants to herbivores are strikingand general across <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> plant and herbivore community.Understanding variati<strong>on</strong> in plant-herbivore interacti<strong>on</strong>s atboth <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se scales provides a framework for syn<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>sizingresults <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> different studies d<strong>on</strong>e in different locati<strong>on</strong>s, allowstests <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> general ecological <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ory, and may shed insights intoecological processes obtained when Spartina is introducedinto new geographic regi<strong>on</strong>s.LOCAL VARIATIONSpartina alterniflora varies in palatability to herbivoreswithin individual marshes because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> variati<strong>on</strong> in soilbiogeochemistry that mediates plant traits. Salt marshhabitats are physically stressful for plants. Periodic flooding<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> marsh soils leads to high levels <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sulfides, low redoxlevels, low levels <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> oxygen, and low bioavailability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>nitrogen, a suite <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> factors that are inimicable to vigorous-9-
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> Spartinaplant growth (P<strong>on</strong>namperuma 1972; Mendelssohn andMorris 2000). The high salinity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> salt marsh soils fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rlimits plant growth by reducing soil water potential,damaging cellular processes, and interfering with nitrogenuptake (Drake 1989; Mendelssohn and Morris 2000).Flooding and salinity levels vary across <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> marshlandscape (Pennings and Bertness 2001). Flooding is leastat <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> terrestrial border <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> marsh, which is rarely flooded,and increases at lower marsh elevati<strong>on</strong>s; however, stresscaused by flooding may be reduced at low elevati<strong>on</strong>simmediately adjacent to creekbanks, where <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is a highlevel <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> exchange between pore water and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> water column(Howes et al. 1981; Howes and Goehringer 1994). Salinitylevels are low at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> terrestrial border, close to those <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>water column at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> creekbank, and may peak in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> highmarsh if c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s favor evaporati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> water andc<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> salts (Pennings and Bertness 1999).Because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this variati<strong>on</strong> in soil biogeochemistry acrosselevati<strong>on</strong>, almost all salt marsh plants exhibit str<strong>on</strong>g spatialvariati<strong>on</strong> in height and o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r morphological traits (Richardset al. 2005). For S. alterniflora, which occurs at middle tolow marsh elevati<strong>on</strong>s, plants at middle elevati<strong>on</strong>s are short(to < 50 cm) and plants at low elevati<strong>on</strong>s, especially close tocreekbanks, are tall (to > 200 cm). This spatial variati<strong>on</strong> inmorphology is str<strong>on</strong>gly driven by variati<strong>on</strong> in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> abioticenvir<strong>on</strong>ment, although genetic variati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g plants alsoaffects morphology (Valiela et al. 1978; Anders<strong>on</strong> andTreshow 1980; Gallagher et al. 1988; Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fitt et al. 2003).Given str<strong>on</strong>g variati<strong>on</strong> in plant height and morphologyacross <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> intertidal z<strong>on</strong>e, it is not surprising that palatabilityto herbivores also varies across intertidal gradients. Lowmarshplants are more palatable than mid-marsh plants to avariety <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> herbivores, including geese (Buchsbaum et al.1984), hemiptera (Denno et al. 1980; Denno et al. 1996),grasshoppers (Gorans<strong>on</strong> et al. 2004) and snails (Silliman andBertness 2002).The plant traits mediating this variati<strong>on</strong> in palatabilityhave not been explicitly examined; however, low- and midmarshplants differ in two important ways that are likely toaffect palatability to herbivores. First, low-marsh plantshave a higher nitrogen c<strong>on</strong>tent than do plants occurring in<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mid-marsh (Gallagher et al. 1980; Bowdish and Stiling1998). Sec<strong>on</strong>d, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> phenolics (a class <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>chemical compounds that <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten deter feeding by herbivores)is lower in low-marsh plants than in mid-marsh plants(Buchsbaum et al. 1984). Variati<strong>on</strong> in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se two traits likelyexplains much <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> preference <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> herbivores for low-marshversus mid-marsh S. alterniflora.The palatability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. alterniflora to herbivores is alsoaffected by past herbivory (Denno et al. 2000). Feeding byherbivores may reduce plant nutriti<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>tent and/orinduce defenses against herbivores. In low-latitude marshes,gastropods that damage S. alterniflora are much moreabundant in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mid marsh than <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> low marsh (Silliman andBertness 2002). To <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> extent that this pattern is generalam<strong>on</strong>g herbivores, herbivore feeding damage in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> middlemarsh z<strong>on</strong>e could reinforce patterns <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> plant palatabilitycreated by biogeochemical differences across elevati<strong>on</strong>.Variati<strong>on</strong> in palatability to herbivores across marshelevati<strong>on</strong> is not unique to S. alterniflora. A number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> saltmarsh plants vary in palatability to herbivores as a functi<strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> marsh elevati<strong>on</strong> and/or salinity (Hemminga and vanSoelen 1988; Levine et al. 1998; Mo<strong>on</strong> and Stiling 2000;Gorans<strong>on</strong> et al. 2004). Given that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> physical stressgradients in salt marshes affect both nitrogen availability andplant size, it is likely that most salt marsh plants vary innitrogen c<strong>on</strong>tent and toughness across elevati<strong>on</strong>, and itwould be surprising if variati<strong>on</strong> in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se factors did notaffect palatability to herbivores. The details <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> how physicalstress mediates plant palatability in salt marshes, however,appear to be species-specific, depending <strong>on</strong> both <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> plantand <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> herbivore involved, and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore cannot be reducedto a simple generalizati<strong>on</strong> that applies across all species(Gorans<strong>on</strong> et al. 2004).LATITUDINAL VARIATIONSpartina alterniflora also varies in palatability toherbivores across latitude. Paired feeding preference assayscomparing S. alterniflora from New England versus <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>South Atlantic Bight found that four species <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> herbivoresstr<strong>on</strong>gly preferred to eat <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> high-latitude plants versus <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>low-latitude plants (Pennings et al. 2001). Results weresignificant in 19 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 21 assays, and did not depend <strong>on</strong> seas<strong>on</strong>,year, species <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> herbivore, or geographic origin <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>herbivore. Similar results were obtained for nine o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r saltmarsh plant species that were studied, and held true across asuite <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> herbivore taxa, indicating that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> preference forhigh- versus low-latitude plants was general across <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> entireplant and herbivore community.What plant traits explain <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> preference for high-latitudeplants? A comparis<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> plant traits suggested that highlatitudeS. alterniflora plants had a higher nitrogen c<strong>on</strong>tentand were less tough than low-latitude plants (Siska et al.2002). In additi<strong>on</strong>, given a choice between polar extracts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>high- and low-latitude plants, c<strong>on</strong>sumers c<strong>on</strong>sistentlypreferred to eat <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> high-latitude extracts, suggesting that<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re were latitudinal differences in polar chemistry.(C<strong>on</strong>sumers did not show c<strong>on</strong>sistent preferences for n<strong>on</strong>polarextracts.) Phenolics, which are polar compounds, werehigher in low- versus high-latitude plants. Thus, this studysuggested that all three plant traits that were examined—nitrogen, toughness and sec<strong>on</strong>dary chemistry—might makehigh-latitude plants more palatable than low-latitude plants.Differences in palatability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. alterniflora plantsacross latitude appear to be c<strong>on</strong>stitutive ra<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than solely aplastic resp<strong>on</strong>se to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> envir<strong>on</strong>ment. When S. alternifloraplants were grown in a comm<strong>on</strong>-garden greenhouse-10-
- Page 2 and 3: Proceedings <stron
- Page 4 and 5: FORWARD & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe <stro
- Page 6 and 7: TABLE OF CONTENTSForward & Acknowle
- Page 9 and 10: Community Spartina Education and St
- Page 11 and 12: included the docum
- Page 14: CHAPTER ONESpartina Biology
- Page 17 and 18: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 21: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 28 and 29: Proceedings <stron
- Page 30 and 31: Proceedings <stron
- Page 32 and 33: Proceedings <stron
- Page 34: Proceedings <stron
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 42 and 43: Proceedings <stron
- Page 44: Proceedings <stron
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 49 and 50: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 60 and 61: Proceedings <stron
- Page 62 and 63: Proceedings <stron
- Page 64 and 65: Proceedings <stron
- Page 66: Proceedings <stron
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 74 and 75:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 76:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 81 and 82:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 83 and 84:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 86 and 87:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 88 and 89:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 90 and 91:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 92 and 93:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 94 and 95:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 96 and 97:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 98:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 108 and 109:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 110:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 113 and 114:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 115 and 116:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 122 and 123:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 124 and 125:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 126 and 127:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 128:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 134 and 135:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 136 and 137:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 138 and 139:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 140:
CHAPTER THREEEcosystem Effects <str
- Page 143 and 144:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 145 and 146:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 148 and 149:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 150 and 151:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 152:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 155 and 156:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 160 and 161:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 162 and 163:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 164:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 167 and 168:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 171 and 172:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 174 and 175:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 176:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 179 and 180:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 181 and 182:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 184 and 185:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 186 and 187:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 188 and 189:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 190 and 191:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 192 and 193:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 194 and 195:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 196:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 199 and 200:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 201 and 202:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 204 and 205:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 206 and 207:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 208 and 209:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 210 and 211:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 212:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 216 and 217:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 218 and 219:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 220 and 221:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 222 and 223:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 224 and 225:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 226 and 227:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 228 and 229:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 230 and 231:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 232 and 233:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 234 and 235:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 236 and 237:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 238 and 239:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 240 and 241:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 242 and 243:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 244 and 245:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 246:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 249 and 250:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 251 and 252:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 253 and 254:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 255 and 256:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 257 and 258:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 259 and 260:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 261 and 262:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 263 and 264:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 265 and 266:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 267 and 268:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 269 and 270:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 271 and 272:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 273 and 274:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 276 and 277:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 278 and 279:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 280 and 281:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 282 and 283:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 284 and 285:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 286 and 287:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 288 and 289:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 290:
Proceedings <stron