<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaChapter 1: Spartina BiologyVARYING SUCCESS OF SPARTINA SPP. INVASIONS IN CHINA:GENETIC DIVERSITY OR DIFFERENTIATION?S. AN 1 , Y. XIAO 1 , H. QING 1 , Z. WANG 1 , C. ZHOU 1 , B. LI 2 , S. SHI 3 , D. YU 1 , Z. DENG 1 , AND L. CHEN 11School <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Life Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China; anshq@nju.edu.cn2Ministry Of Educati<strong>on</strong> Key Laboratory For Biodiversity Science And Ecological Engineering, Institute Of BiodiversityScience, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China; Bool@fudan.nju.edu.cn3School <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Life Science, Zh<strong>on</strong>gshan University, Guangzhou 510275, China; Sshlss@zsu.edu.cnBiological invasi<strong>on</strong>s are widely envisaged as a comp<strong>on</strong>ent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> global change, which not <strong>on</strong>ly threatennative biodiversity but also cause a c<strong>on</strong>siderable ec<strong>on</strong>omic loss to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> invaded areas. However, forsome species little is known about why <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y are successful invaders. At <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> molecular level, manyresearchers have reported that high genetic diversity c<strong>on</strong>tributes to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> success <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> plant invasi<strong>on</strong>swhereas o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r studies have shown that reduced genetic variati<strong>on</strong> makes invasive species more successful.Obviously, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se are c<strong>on</strong>tradictory explanati<strong>on</strong>s. Our studies <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartina in China showthat S. alterniflora with higher populati<strong>on</strong> differentiati<strong>on</strong> (Fst) was more successful in invadingcoastal China than S. anglica which had low Fst, although <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> latter species, having fixed heterozygosity,had much higher genetic diversity than <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> former. Greater number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> chromosomes orhigher genetic diversity (P and H) does not necessarily mean higher adaptability and more successfulinvasi<strong>on</strong> for exotic species, while higher Fst was associated with higher invading ability in S.alterniflora. However, factors o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than genetic variati<strong>on</strong> and populati<strong>on</strong> genetic structure may bemore important in determining invasi<strong>on</strong> success.Keywords: Average heterogeneity, genetic diversity, plant invasi<strong>on</strong>, populati<strong>on</strong> differentiati<strong>on</strong>,Spartina<strong>Invasive</strong> plant species threaten <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> integrity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> naturalecosystems and reduce <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> growth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ec<strong>on</strong>omic cropsthroughout <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> world by displacing native plant communities(Kennedy et al. 2002), establishing m<strong>on</strong>oculturesand competing with ec<strong>on</strong>omic species in new habitats(Callaway 2002). At <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> populati<strong>on</strong> level, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> leading <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>oriesfor <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> successful invasi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> plants are <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir escapefrom <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> natural enemies that hold <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m in check, freeing<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m to utilize <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir full potential for resource competiti<strong>on</strong>(Keane & Crawley 2002); allelopathic effects, where <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>phytotoxins released by exotic plants damage native species(Callaway & Aschehoug 2000; Bais et al. 2003); and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>occurrence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a suitable niche existing in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> new locati<strong>on</strong>(Sakai et al. 2001). At <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> molecular level, most researchershave reported that high genetic diversity c<strong>on</strong>tributes to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>success <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> plant invasi<strong>on</strong>s (Ellstrand & Schierenbeck 2000;Novak & Mack 2001), although reduced genetic variati<strong>on</strong>can make invasive species more successful (Tsutsui et al.2000). Here we suggest that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> different molecular parametersare correlated with success or failure <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartinainvasi<strong>on</strong>s in China.Historically, no native species <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> genus Spartinaexisted in China. For <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> purpose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ecological engineering,two Spartina species, S. anglica and S. alterniflora, wereintroduced to China in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> last century. However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir fatesdiffered. Spartina anglica originated in 1870s in east coastalEngland and is a hybrid between S. maritima as paternalspecies and S. alterniflora as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> seed parent (Ferris et al.1997). In 1963, 44 individuals (actually ramets) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. anglicawere produced by seed in China; 21 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m were planted in<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> field and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rs were used to produce more <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fspring,three <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> which had marvelous reproductive capacity (Chung1985). From 3 individuals, 9,100,000 cl<strong>on</strong>es were produced in1966, and were planted in 40 hectares (ha) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> costal regi<strong>on</strong>sin China. Thirteen years later, about 31,600 ha <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. anglicalow marshes were established in coastal China, and 36,000ha in 83 counties al<strong>on</strong>g coastal China (Fig. 1a) in 1985 (Qin& Chung 1992). Its sou<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn limit in China was at 21º27’Nwhereas <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sou<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn limit in its native range is locatedbetween 42ºand 43º N in Europe (Chung 1993).The populati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. anglica in China have generallylower height, lower biomass and lower net producti<strong>on</strong> (Chung1985) than <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir counterparts in its native range (Chater &J<strong>on</strong>es 1951; Gray & Benham 1991; Hubbard 1969) (Table 1).Starting in 1993, S. anglica became shorter in height, andlower in biomass and net biomass producti<strong>on</strong>. Pr<strong>on</strong>ounceddieback occurred in Chinese populati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. anglica like<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> older populati<strong>on</strong>s in England (Gray et al. 1991). In 2000,S. anglica was found <strong>on</strong>ly in six counties (Fig. 1b). In 2002,<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> populati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. anglica were found <strong>on</strong>ly in three counties,and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total area was less than 50 ha. Plant performancec<strong>on</strong>tinued to be suppressed, e.g., height, biomass and netproducti<strong>on</strong> were reduced; and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> suppressi<strong>on</strong> still c<strong>on</strong>tinues.Most <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. anglica populati<strong>on</strong>s have been competitivelyreplaced by S. alterniflora, Phragmites australis, Typha spp.and Scirpus spp.-33-
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaTable 1. Variati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartina anglica between native range and Chinaai s i r is s 1iri i1 2 4 6 H d s86 10 0.8 0.8 1.6 0.8 0.8 0.126 0.4202 0.0 84 0.0 20rs 1 1 1 1 1 66 1 8 2000 2002i ss2 41 .8 12 1. 2 24 . 8 8 1.0 21 .28 02.6r di2 yr44 00 110. 601.8 6. 112.4H i 0 0 4 1 80 0d r r ri s s r s 1 . 20012 H bb rd 1 6 r y d 1 1 d 4 r d s 1 1 .bFig. 1. Distributi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartina anglica and Spartina alterniflora in 1985 (a)and 2000 (b) al<strong>on</strong>g coastal China. Circles represent Spartina anglica andstars denote Spartina alterniflora.Seven multilocus genotypes (G1-G7) were identifiedusing RAPD markers for S. anglica in its native Europe(Baumel et al. 2001). G1 is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> basic type that accounts for86% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> samples (Table 1). G2 – G7 are varieties <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> G1and <strong>on</strong>ly account for 10% - 0.8% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total. The studyshowed that S. anglica has low genetic variati<strong>on</strong> due to agenetic bottleneck. As an exotic species, S. anglica in Chinahas even lower genetic variati<strong>on</strong> with lower percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>polymorphical loci (P), mean coefficient <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> dissimilarity(Gd) and coefficient <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> populati<strong>on</strong> differentiati<strong>on</strong> (Fst) (Table1) although AFLP markers can provide higher diversity thanRAPD markers. Lower variati<strong>on</strong> may indicate that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> speciespartially lost some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its variati<strong>on</strong> during <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> human-aidedinvasi<strong>on</strong>s in China, since <strong>on</strong>ly small parts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> native populati<strong>on</strong>were collected in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> introducti<strong>on</strong> process.S. alterniflora is a native species <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> north AtlanticAmerica. In 1979, 60 individuals and hundreds <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> seeds werecollected from Florida, Georgia and North Carolina, c<strong>on</strong>sisting<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> three distinct populati<strong>on</strong>s that differed in height,biomass producti<strong>on</strong> and protein (Chung 1985; Qin & Chung1992), namely F-type (Florida-type), G-type (Georgia-type)and N-type (North Carolina-type). In 1981, about 400 squaremeters (m 2 ) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> planted area were established for each populati<strong>on</strong>,and in 1985 <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> area expanded to 260 ha with humanhelp (Qin & Chung 1992) (Fig. 1a). In 1990, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re were 1,300ha <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. alterniflora m<strong>on</strong>oculture al<strong>on</strong>g coastal China, but<strong>on</strong>ly G-type remained as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> two o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r types were replacedby <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> G-type through intraspecific competiti<strong>on</strong> (Guan et al.2003). In 2000, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total area reached 120,000 ha (Guan et al.2003) (Fig. 1b).Unlike S. anglica, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> exotic S. alterniflora has highreproductive and dispersal capacity, and is competitive; ittook <strong>on</strong>ly 19 years to increase its area from 0.08 ha to 21,300ha in Jiangsu Province (Shen & Liu 2002). It excluded almostall <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r native plants that were originally dominantin wetlands, including Phragmites australis, Typha spp.,Scirpus spp., Suadae spp., and even invaded fishp<strong>on</strong>ds andyoung mangrove swamps (Qian & Ma 1995). Many nativespecies, including plants, some endangered birds (Ma etal. 2003), and molluscs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ec<strong>on</strong>omic importance in coastalChina are threatened by S. alterniflora invasi<strong>on</strong>s (Qian &Ma 1994). Spartina alterniflora is <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> nine notoriousinvasive pest plants in China since <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> species directly causesmilli<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> dollars <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ec<strong>on</strong>omic loss per year (Chen 1998).Spartina alterniflora is still rapidly replacing <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nativeplants, although <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Chinese government and scientists aredoing <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir best to c<strong>on</strong>trol or eradiate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> species by physical,chemical, biological and integrated methods (Lin 1997; Liu& Huang 2000).S. alterniflora populati<strong>on</strong>s in China have similar percent<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> polymorphic loci (P) to native populati<strong>on</strong>s (Travis et al.2002), but we found that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> species in China has muchhigher average heterogeneity (H), coefficient <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> populati<strong>on</strong>differentiati<strong>on</strong> (Fst), and much lower mean coefficient <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>dissimilarity (Gd) (Table 2). The introduced S. alterniflorahas accumulated much populati<strong>on</strong> genetic differentiati<strong>on</strong>,-34-
- Page 2 and 3: Proceedings <stron
- Page 4 and 5: FORWARD & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe <stro
- Page 6 and 7: TABLE OF CONTENTSForward & Acknowle
- Page 9 and 10: Community Spartina Education and St
- Page 11 and 12: included the docum
- Page 14: CHAPTER ONESpartina Biology
- Page 17 and 18: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 21 and 22: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 28 and 29: Proceedings <stron
- Page 30 and 31: Proceedings <stron
- Page 32 and 33: Proceedings <stron
- Page 34: Proceedings <stron
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 42 and 43: Proceedings <stron
- Page 44: Proceedings <stron
- Page 49 and 50: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 60 and 61: Proceedings <stron
- Page 62 and 63: Proceedings <stron
- Page 64 and 65: Proceedings <stron
- Page 66: Proceedings <stron
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 74 and 75: Proceedings <stron
- Page 76: Proceedings <stron
- Page 79 and 80: Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 86 and 87: Proceedings <stron
- Page 88 and 89: Proceedings <stron
- Page 90 and 91: Proceedings <stron
- Page 92 and 93: Proceedings <stron
- Page 94 and 95: Proceedings <stron
- Page 96 and 97:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 98:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 108 and 109:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 110:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 113 and 114:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 115 and 116:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 122 and 123:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 124 and 125:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 126 and 127:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 128:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 134 and 135:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 136 and 137:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 138 and 139:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 140:
CHAPTER THREEEcosystem Effects <str
- Page 143 and 144:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 145 and 146:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 148 and 149:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 150 and 151:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 152:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 155 and 156:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 160 and 161:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 162 and 163:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 164:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 167 and 168:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 171 and 172:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 174 and 175:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 176:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 179 and 180:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 181 and 182:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 184 and 185:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 186 and 187:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 188 and 189:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 190 and 191:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 192 and 193:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 194 and 195:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 196:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 199 and 200:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 201 and 202:
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 204 and 205:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 206 and 207:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 208 and 209:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 210 and 211:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 212:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 216 and 217:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 218 and 219:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 220 and 221:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 222 and 223:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 224 and 225:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 226 and 227:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 228 and 229:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 230 and 231:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 232 and 233:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 234 and 235:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 236 and 237:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 238 and 239:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 240 and 241:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 242 and 243:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 244 and 245:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 246:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 249 and 250:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 251 and 252:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 253 and 254:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 255 and 256:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 257 and 258:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 259 and 260:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 261 and 262:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 263 and 264:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 265 and 266:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 267 and 268:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 269 and 270:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 271 and 272:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 273 and 274:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 276 and 277:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 278 and 279:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 280 and 281:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 282 and 283:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 284 and 285:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 286 and 287:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 288 and 289:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 290:
Proceedings <stron