<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaChapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaIMPACTS OF BENTHIC INVERTEBRATES ON SEDIMENT POREWATER AMMONIUM ANDSULFIDE:CONSEQUENCES FOR SPARTINA SEEDLING GROWTHU.H. MAHL 1,2 ,A.C.TYLER 1,3 AND E.D. GROSHOLZ 11 Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Science and Policy, University <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> California, Davis, CA 956162 Current address: Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Biology, University <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Notre Dame, South Bend, IN 46556; umahl@nd.edu3 Current address: School <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Biological and Medical Sciences, Rochester Institute <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Technology, Rochester, NY 14623Since its introducti<strong>on</strong> in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1970s, Spartina alterniflora and its hybrids have rapidly invaded <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>intertidal z<strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> San Francisco Bay. We know relatively little about <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> biotic and abiotic factorsthat have ei<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r facilitated or hindered this invasi<strong>on</strong>. In its native range, nitrogen availability andsediment anoxia are known to limit <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> growth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. alterniflora. Benthic invertebrates may alterporewater c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> both amm<strong>on</strong>ium and soluble sulfide, and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>reby indirectly influence S.alterniflora success. In order to better understand how <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> resident macr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>aunal invertebratecommunity may impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> expansi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. alterniflora into <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> intertidal z<strong>on</strong>e, we examined howcomm<strong>on</strong> invertebrates influence c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> amm<strong>on</strong>ium and soluble sulfide in sedimentporewater. We c<strong>on</strong>ducted laboratory microcosm experiments to determine how species from threefuncti<strong>on</strong>al feeding groups <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> benthic invertebrates (subsurface deposit feeders, surface depositfeeders and surface grazers) affect porewater in unvegetated areas adjacent to Spartina-invadedareas. In a separate experiment, we examined <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> growth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. alterniflora seedlings in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> presence<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> individual invertebrates. Relative to microcosms without invertebrates, where porewateramm<strong>on</strong>ium was fairly high (greater than 400 micromoles per liter [μM]), we found slightly lowerporewater amm<strong>on</strong>ium in microcosms with Heteromastus filiformis (subsurface deposit feeder) orMacoma petalum (surface deposit feeder). Porewater sulfide was slightly higher in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>H. filiformis <strong>on</strong>ly. The significantly greater growth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. alterniflora seedlings in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> M.petalum than in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> H. filiformis suggests that both high sulfide and high amm<strong>on</strong>iummay have been detrimental to seedling success. Thus, invertebrates may indirectly influence <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>success <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. alterniflora seedlings by altering porewater chemistry.Keywords: amm<strong>on</strong>ium, benthic, functi<strong>on</strong>al group, invasive species, porewater, Spartina, sulfideINTRODUCTIONAm<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> greatest threats to natural ecosystems areinvasi<strong>on</strong>s by n<strong>on</strong>-native species (Drake et al. 1989;Vitousek et al. 1997). However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mechanisms thatdetermine <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> success or failure <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> new invasi<strong>on</strong>s are <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>tenpoorly understood. The invasi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pacific Coast estuariesby Spartina alterniflora and its hybrids (S. alterniflora xnative Spartina foliosa) provides some insight into howSpartina can rapidly change benthic communities throughaltering physico-chemical properties <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> habitat. Theshift from native mudflats and relatively diverse uppermarsh habitats to dense Spartina meadows followinginvasi<strong>on</strong> has pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ound effects <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> functi<strong>on</strong>al diversity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>benthic invertebrates, nutrient cycling, and o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r physicalprocesses (Neira et al. 2005, 2006; Levin et al. 2006).However, we still have little informati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> what biotic andabiotic factors may c<strong>on</strong>tribute to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> great success <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>Spartina in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> intertidal z<strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> San Francisco Bay.Determining which factors most str<strong>on</strong>gly influence seedlingestablishment will greatly improve our understanding <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>dynamics <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> invasi<strong>on</strong>.Previous work has shown that nutrient limitati<strong>on</strong> andanoxia affect <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> growth and survival <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> native S.alterniflora in Atlantic coast salt marshes (e.g., Gallagher1975; King et al. 1982; DeLaune et al. 1983; Dai andWiegert 1997) and that nutrient limitati<strong>on</strong> may be especiallysevere during <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> early stages <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> marsh development in bothnative and invaded marshes (Tyler et al. 2003, 2007).Benthic invertebrates can significantly impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> solutes in porewater and nutrient cyclingthrough bioturbati<strong>on</strong>, burrow ventilati<strong>on</strong> and c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>organic matter (e.g. Aller 1982, Peters<strong>on</strong> and Heck 1999;Christensen et al. 2000). However, research has not beend<strong>on</strong>e to determine whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> benthiccommunities <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> nutrients (e.g.,amm<strong>on</strong>ium) and toxic metabolites (e.g., soluble sulfide) inporewater can affect <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> success <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> invasive plants like S.alterniflora.As part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an investigati<strong>on</strong> linking benthic communitystructure to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> establishment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. alterniflora seedlings, weperformed two pilot microcosm experiments. The objective<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first experiment was to determine whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r comm<strong>on</strong>benthic invertebrates from three different functi<strong>on</strong>al feeding- 165 -
Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Invasive</strong> Spartina<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> Spartinagroups affect porewater amm<strong>on</strong>ium and soluble sulfidewithout plants present. The objective <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sec<strong>on</strong>dexperiment was to determine whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se same speciesinfluenced <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> growth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. alterniflora seedlings. Wepredicted that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se three functi<strong>on</strong>al groups would havedifferent effects <strong>on</strong> porewater chemistry resulting indifferential growth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. alterniflora seedlings.METHODSWe c<strong>on</strong>ducted microcosm experiments in anenvir<strong>on</strong>mental chamber with a c<strong>on</strong>stant temperature <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 14°Cand a 12-hour light cycle. All organisms and sedimentswere collected from mudflats near <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> edge <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a hybridSpartina marsh at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Elsie Roemer Bird Sanctuary,Alameda Island, San Francisco Bay, California.Microcosms c<strong>on</strong>sisted <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> clear polycarb<strong>on</strong>ate tubes (9.3centimeters inside diameter [cm I.D.] x 30 cm height [H])filled with two layers <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> homogenized, defaunated sediment.The lower layer (12 cm) was seived to 500 micrometers(μm) and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n frozen for two weeks to kill any organismsthat passed through <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> seive. The surface layer (3 cm),which was seived to 300 μm, but unfrozen, inoculated <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>core with natural micr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>lora. Following rec<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>cores acclimated in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> envir<strong>on</strong>mental chamber for threedays. Organic matter (<strong>on</strong>e gram [g] dried, ground Ulva sp.)was added to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> surface <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> each microcosm <strong>on</strong>e day prior toorganism additi<strong>on</strong>. To simulate tidal inundati<strong>on</strong>, wec<strong>on</strong>structed an elaborate, automated system that filled eachchamber with sea water (32 parts per thousand [ppt])halfway through <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> light cycle and drained each chamberhalfway through <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> dark cycle each day.In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first experiment, we tested <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> threefuncti<strong>on</strong>al feeding groups (subsurface deposit feeders,surface deposit feeders, and surface grazers) <strong>on</strong> porewateramm<strong>on</strong>ium and soluble sulfide c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s. Ourexperimental design c<strong>on</strong>sisted <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a defaunated c<strong>on</strong>trol andthree single species treatments (n = 6) representing each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> three functi<strong>on</strong>al groups: <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> capitellid polychaeteHeteromastus filiformis (sub-surface deposit feeder), <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>nassariid snail Ilyanassa obsoleta (surface grazer) and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>tellinid clam Macoma petalum (surface deposit feeder) wi<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ight replicates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> each treatment (Table 1). The numbers <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>individuals added to each microcosm were equivalent todensities at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Elsie Roemer site (see Neira et al. 2005).We extracted porewater from depths <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2, 4, and 7 cm usingTable 1: Design for Experiment 1. Density is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> individuals forthat taxa per core (68 cm 2 ). N=6 for all treatments.Treatment Functi<strong>on</strong>al Group DensityDefaunated c<strong>on</strong>trol - -Heteromastus filiformis Subsurface deposit feeder 30Ilyanassa obsolete Surface grazer 2Macoma petalum Surface deposit feeder 3a perforated stainless steel sampling probe (Berg andMcGla<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ry 2001) at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> terminati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> experiment (14days). Porewater samples were analyzed for amm<strong>on</strong>iumusing <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> indophenol blue method (Solorzano 1969) and forsulfide using a modificati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> method described byCline (1969). For statistical analyses <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> porewaterparameters, we calculated a mean value for all three depthsfor each replicate and analyzed differences am<strong>on</strong>gtreatments separately for amm<strong>on</strong>ium and sulfide usingANOVA.In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sec<strong>on</strong>d experiment, we used <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same invertebratetreatments and defaunated c<strong>on</strong>trol as in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first experiment,but added <strong>on</strong>e S. alterniflora seedling to each microcosm.We used nine replicates for defaunated c<strong>on</strong>trols and each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> three macroinvertebrate treatments. The seedlings usedin this experiment were germinated in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> greenhouse usingseeds from inflorescences collected in Willapa Bay,Washingt<strong>on</strong>. Thirty days after germinati<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> seedlingswere transferred to envir<strong>on</strong>mental chambers and acclimatedto experimental temperature and light regimes while salinity<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> water in sediments was gradually increased from 0 to35 ppt over a period <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10 days. Seedlings were transplantedto microcosms after this acclimati<strong>on</strong> period. After 14 days,we measured change in total leaf length (sum <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> length <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>individual leaves) and seedling biomass (aboveground andbelowground). We analyzed differences am<strong>on</strong>g treatmentsusing ANOVA.RESULTSFor <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first experiment, preliminary analysis suggestedthat <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> affects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> benthic invertebrates <strong>on</strong> porewateramm<strong>on</strong>ium and sulfide c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s differed am<strong>on</strong>gfuncti<strong>on</strong>al groups. Sulfide c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s were highest inmicrocosms c<strong>on</strong>taining H. filiformis but differences betweentreatments were not significant (p = 0.381; Fig. 1A). Theamm<strong>on</strong>ium c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> was highest in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>trol andlowest in microcosms c<strong>on</strong>taining M. petalum, but again <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>differences were not significant (p = 0.285; Fig. 1B). Thesurface grazer I. obsoleta had no obvious effects <strong>on</strong>amm<strong>on</strong>ium or sulfide.Overall, in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sec<strong>on</strong>d experiment, seedlingestablishment was relatively poor, and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re was visibleyellowing and dehydrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> leaves in all treatments,particularly microcosms c<strong>on</strong>taining H. filiformis. However,our preliminary analysis indicates that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> surface depositfeeder treatment (M. petalum) had a positive effect <strong>on</strong>seedling establishment (Fig. 2A, 2B and 2C). In c<strong>on</strong>trast toc<strong>on</strong>trols that had no significant growth, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total leaf lengthincreased approximately seven cm in microcosms c<strong>on</strong>tainingM. petalum. Post-hoc Tukey tests indicated significantdifferences between M. petalum and H. filiformis (p =0.048). Aboveground and belowground biomass were alsohigher in microcosms c<strong>on</strong>taining M. petalum than in o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r- 166 -
- Page 2 and 3:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 4 and 5:
FORWARD & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe <stro
- Page 6 and 7:
TABLE OF CONTENTSForward & Acknowle
- Page 9 and 10:
Community Spartina Education and St
- Page 11 and 12:
included the docum
- Page 14:
CHAPTER ONESpartina Biology
- Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 28 and 29:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 30 and 31:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 32 and 33:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 34:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 42 and 43:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 44:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 47 and 48:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 49 and 50:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 55 and 56:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 57 and 58:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 60 and 61:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 62 and 63:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 64 and 65:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 66:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 1: Spartina Biology
- Page 74 and 75:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 76:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 81 and 82:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 83 and 84:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 86 and 87:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 88 and 89:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 90 and 91:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 92 and 93:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 94 and 95:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 96 and 97:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 98:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 108 and 109:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 110:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 113 and 114:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 115 and 116:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 122 and 123:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 124 and 125:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 126 and 127: Proceedings <stron
- Page 128: Proceedings <stron
- Page 131 and 132: Chapter 2: Spartina Distribution an
- Page 134 and 135: Proceedings <stron
- Page 136 and 137: Proceedings <stron
- Page 138 and 139: Proceedings <stron
- Page 140: CHAPTER THREEEcosystem Effects <str
- Page 143 and 144: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 145 and 146: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 148 and 149: Proceedings <stron
- Page 150 and 151: Proceedings <stron
- Page 152: Proceedings <stron
- Page 155 and 156: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 157 and 158: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 160 and 161: Proceedings <stron
- Page 162 and 163: Proceedings <stron
- Page 164: Proceedings <stron
- Page 167 and 168: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 169 and 170: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 171 and 172: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 174 and 175: Proceedings <stron
- Page 176: Proceedings <stron
- Page 181 and 182: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 184 and 185: Proceedings <stron
- Page 186 and 187: Proceedings <stron
- Page 188 and 189: Proceedings <stron
- Page 190 and 191: Proceedings <stron
- Page 192 and 193: Proceedings <stron
- Page 194 and 195: Proceedings <stron
- Page 196: Proceedings <stron
- Page 199 and 200: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 201 and 202: Chapter 3: Ecosystem Effects <stron
- Page 204 and 205: Proceedings <stron
- Page 206 and 207: Proceedings <stron
- Page 208 and 209: Proceedings <stron
- Page 210 and 211: Proceedings <stron
- Page 212: Proceedings <stron
- Page 216 and 217: Proceedings <stron
- Page 218 and 219: Proceedings <stron
- Page 220 and 221: Proceedings <stron
- Page 222 and 223: Proceedings <stron
- Page 224 and 225: Proceedings <stron
- Page 226 and 227: Proceedings <stron
- Page 228 and 229:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 230 and 231:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 232 and 233:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 234 and 235:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 236 and 237:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 238 and 239:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 240 and 241:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 242 and 243:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 244 and 245:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 246:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 249 and 250:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 251 and 252:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 253 and 254:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 255 and 256:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 257 and 258:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 259 and 260:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 261 and 262:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 263 and 264:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 265 and 266:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 267 and 268:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 269 and 270:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 271 and 272:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 273 and 274:
Chapter 4: Spartina Control and Man
- Page 276 and 277:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 278 and 279:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 280 and 281:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 282 and 283:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 284 and 285:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 286 and 287:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 288 and 289:
Proceedings <stron
- Page 290:
Proceedings <stron