<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaChapter 4: Spartina C<strong>on</strong>trol and ManagementAno<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r aspect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> agency support is interagencycooperati<strong>on</strong>. The ability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> each agency to work closely wi<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ach o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r, share equipment, resources and pers<strong>on</strong>nel hasalso been a very important part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> eradicati<strong>on</strong> program’ssuccess. The various partners in Washingt<strong>on</strong> have signed <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>f<strong>on</strong> a Memorandum <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Understanding (MOU) that helps t<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>oster this cooperative process.Legislative support has also been extremely importantin helping to motivate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> governmental agencies to makeSpartina eradicati<strong>on</strong> a priority. Most importantly, str<strong>on</strong>gpolitical support from both local and federal politicians hasensured <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> program <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> adequate funding. Such support mustbe <strong>on</strong>going to ensure that adequate funding remainsavailable.PLANNING AND COORDINATIONThe Washingt<strong>on</strong> State Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Agriculture(WSDA) has been identified by law, RCW 17.26 (RevisedCode <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Washingt<strong>on</strong>), as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lead agency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartinaeradicati<strong>on</strong> program. Lead agency resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities includeensuring that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proper permits are in place, producingyearly progress reports for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Washingt<strong>on</strong> State Legislature,maintaining eradicati<strong>on</strong> program records, m<strong>on</strong>itoring waterquality in relati<strong>on</strong> to herbicide applicati<strong>on</strong>s, providing publiceducati<strong>on</strong>al informati<strong>on</strong> and developing management plansin cooperati<strong>on</strong> with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r entities. Having <strong>on</strong>e agency in<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> state manage <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities has allowed <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rentities to prioritize <strong>on</strong>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>-ground eradicati<strong>on</strong> efforts.However, no legal authority was given to WSDA requiringpartners to follow specific WSDA plans or directives. Thisled to beneficial innovati<strong>on</strong> in c<strong>on</strong>trol methods as variouspartners tried c<strong>on</strong>trol tools which <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y believed aided ineradicati<strong>on</strong> and built friendly competiti<strong>on</strong> between <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>agencies. However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> absence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> lead-agency authorityalso sometimes resulted in unilateral decisi<strong>on</strong>s and a lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>budgetary transparency.Spartina eradicati<strong>on</strong> efforts in Washingt<strong>on</strong> are plannedcooperatively. In Puget Sound, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North Puget SoundSpartina Eradicati<strong>on</strong> Task Force, made up <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> representativesfrom local and state agencies, tribal entities, and n<strong>on</strong>-pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>itorganizati<strong>on</strong>s meets throughout <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> year to developmanagement plans and discuss <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> successes and failures <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>different approaches. In Willapa Bay, a technical groupmade up <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> field coordinators and biologists develops yearlymanagement plans and brings <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m before an advisorycommittee for review and critique. While <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re has notalways been agreement <strong>on</strong> all <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> specifics c<strong>on</strong>tained in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>management plans, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re has always been c<strong>on</strong>sensus <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>overall goal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> eradicating Spartina. With this comm<strong>on</strong>ground, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> partners c<strong>on</strong>tinue to return to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> planning table.ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENTRCW 17.15.020 directs state agencies in Washingt<strong>on</strong> toimplement integrated pest management (IPM) practiceswhen carrying out <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> agency's or instituti<strong>on</strong>'s duties relatedto pest c<strong>on</strong>trol. IPM effectively extends <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> operating seas<strong>on</strong>and allows techniques to be applied when and where <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ywork best (DOI 1996).Adaptive management is a key element <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a successfulIPM program. It allows management policies and practicesto c<strong>on</strong>tinually improve by learning from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> interimoutcomes <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> eradicati<strong>on</strong> program.http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/amhome/Admin/index.htmWashingt<strong>on</strong>’s Spartina eradicati<strong>on</strong> program c<strong>on</strong>tains fiveadaptive management comp<strong>on</strong>ents: pre-treatmentm<strong>on</strong>itoring, implementing eradicati<strong>on</strong> practices <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>proper scale, post-treatment m<strong>on</strong>itoring and evaluati<strong>on</strong>,adjusting future treatment based <strong>on</strong> evaluati<strong>on</strong>, andc<strong>on</strong>trolling in a c<strong>on</strong>sistent manner.Pre-treatment m<strong>on</strong>itoring sets a baseline for comparis<strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> post-treatment m<strong>on</strong>itoring results. During <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> spring <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>2002, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> partners involved in c<strong>on</strong>trol work developed acomprehensive m<strong>on</strong>itoring plan that included protocols forpre-treatment m<strong>on</strong>itoring. This ensured an accurate baseline<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Spartina stem counts.The next comp<strong>on</strong>ent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> adaptive management isimplementing eradicati<strong>on</strong> practices <strong>on</strong> an appropriate scale.It is important to choose <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proper tools to use and set agoal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> treating <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> entire site. For example, using backpacksprayers to completely treat a 200-hectare meadow wouldnot be appropriate, whereas using a helicopter applicati<strong>on</strong>would be time- and cost-efficient. Post-treatment m<strong>on</strong>itoringhelped determine that using <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proper tool(s) forretreatment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a large Spartina infestati<strong>on</strong> takes a minimum<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> three years. Ensuring that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> entire site receivestreatment is <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten dependent <strong>on</strong> funding, so matchingappropriate funding to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> infestati<strong>on</strong> size is essential.Through field experience and research, it has become clearthat c<strong>on</strong>sistency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> treatment is as important as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> methodchosen for c<strong>on</strong>trol. Early failures in Washingt<strong>on</strong>, in part,resulted from not treating <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> entire site, leaving viableplants to re-seed and spread back into <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> treated porti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> site.Once eradicati<strong>on</strong> practices are implemented, posttreatmentm<strong>on</strong>itoring is c<strong>on</strong>ducted. The m<strong>on</strong>itoring plandeveloped in 2002 ensured that enough samples werecollected to allow for accurate comparis<strong>on</strong> with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pretreatmentsampling. Through this comparis<strong>on</strong>, managers andfield coordinators were able to evaluate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> effectiveness <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> eradicati<strong>on</strong> practices employed.Adjusting <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> treatments based <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> completedevaluati<strong>on</strong> becomes <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> next step in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> process. Forinstance, crushing Spartina was found to be ineffective when<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> substrate was too firm and, as a result, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> site inquesti<strong>on</strong> was sprayed <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> next seas<strong>on</strong>. With adequate preandpost-treatment m<strong>on</strong>itoring and evaluati<strong>on</strong>, managers andfield coordinators get a good picture <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> success or failure- 225 -
Chapter 4: Spartina C<strong>on</strong>trol and Management<str<strong>on</strong>g>Proceedings</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Third</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Invasive</strong> SpartinaFig. 3. Field crew member mowing Spartina anglica with hand-held brushcutters.Fig. 4. Field crew member treating Spartina patens with backpack herbicidesprayer.<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a treatment method. This allows for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> adjustment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>treatment methods for better c<strong>on</strong>trol.The most imporant comp<strong>on</strong>ent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> adaptive managementin Spartina eradicati<strong>on</strong> is c<strong>on</strong>sistent c<strong>on</strong>trol from year toyear. Research has shown that invasive Spartina is highlyresilient and requires multiple years <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>sistent treatmentto cause substantial declines. In some instances inc<strong>on</strong>sistentc<strong>on</strong>trol, specifically, when two treatment seas<strong>on</strong>s werefollowed by a year without treatment, resulted in a 100% to500% increase in cover and number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tillers (Reeder andHacker 2004). This underscores <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>c<strong>on</strong>sistently treating a chosen site year after year to achieveeventual reducti<strong>on</strong> and eradicati<strong>on</strong>.EVOLUTION OF TOOLSOver <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> more than ten years <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> invasive Spartinaeradicati<strong>on</strong> efforts in Washingt<strong>on</strong> State, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> treatment toolshave evolved and become more effective. In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> beginning,crews treated infestati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all sizes with small hand heldbrushcutters (Fig. 3) and backpack herbicide sprayers (Fig.4). While <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se tools are effective <strong>on</strong> small infestati<strong>on</strong>s andare still used to this day, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y are simply too slow foreffectively treating anything greater than a few hectares. Theeradicati<strong>on</strong> program in Washingt<strong>on</strong> now employs helicoptersand large, tracked amphibious machines to treat largemeadows, and airboats with high pressure herbicide spraysytems to treat scattered cl<strong>on</strong>es and re-growth. Thehelicopters, applying herbicides at low carrier volumes, 97lliters per hectare (l/ha) (10 gall<strong>on</strong>s per acre [10 gpa]), cantreat more than 160 ha (400 ac) per day. While slower than<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> helicopters, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> tracked machines with broadcastapplicati<strong>on</strong> systems are still able to treat upwards <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 16 ha(40 ac) per day. Airboats may <strong>on</strong>ly be able to treat 3.2 ha (8ac) per day at most, but <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y are able to manuever in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>estuaries and <strong>on</strong> mudflats, allowing for rapid transportbetween scattered infestati<strong>on</strong>s and produce virtually noenvir<strong>on</strong>mental footprint.Having <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ability to treat large infestati<strong>on</strong>s quickly andeffectively has increased <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> success <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> eradicati<strong>on</strong>program in Washingt<strong>on</strong> .CONCLUSIONOver <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> past two years, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> eradicati<strong>on</strong> program inWashingt<strong>on</strong> State has become more efficient and effective.In 2003, a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2,700 solid ha (6,695 ac) out <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>approximately 3,400 solid ha (8,500 ac) were treated(Murphy 2003). These treatments resulted in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first overallreducti<strong>on</strong> in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> statewide infestati<strong>on</strong>. In 2004, a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>2,500 solid ha (6,200 ac) out <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an estimated 3,000 solid ha(7,500 ac) were treated statewide (Murphy 2004). Managersare c<strong>on</strong>fident that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2004 treatments will also result in aFig. 5. Helicopter herbicide applicati<strong>on</strong>, Willapa Bay, Washingt<strong>on</strong>, USA- 226 -