12.07.2015 Views

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eries. When it works, community-based comanagementillustrates that the tragedy of the commons is notinevitable.Should We Use the Marketplaceto Control Access to Fisheries? Good<strong>and</strong> Bad News about an InterestingIdeaSome countries try to prevent overfishingby giving each fishing vessel quotas that can bebought or sold in the marketplace.Some countries are using a market-based systemcalled individual transfer quotas (ITQs) to help controlaccess to fisheries. The government gives each fishingvessel owner a specified percentage of the total allowablecatch (TAC) for a fishery in a given year.Owners are permitted to buy, sell, or lease theirquotas like private property. Currently about 50 of theworld’s fisheries are managed by the ITQ system. Itwas introduced in New Zeal<strong>and</strong> in 1986 <strong>and</strong> in Icel<strong>and</strong>in 1990. In these countries there has been some reductionin overfishing <strong>and</strong> the overall fishing fleet <strong>and</strong> anend to government fishing subsidies that encourageoverfishing.But enforcement has been difficult, some fishers illegallyexceed their quotas, <strong>and</strong> the wasteful bycatchhas not been reduced.<strong>Environmental</strong>ists have identified four problemswith the ITQ approach <strong>and</strong> have made suggestions forits improvement. First, in effect it transfers ownershipof publicly owned fisheries to private commercial fishersbut still makes the public responsible for the costsof enforcing <strong>and</strong> managing the system. Remedy: Collectfees (not to exceed 5% of the value of the catch) fromquota holders to pay for the costs of government enforcement<strong>and</strong> management of the ITQ system.Second, it can squeeze out small fishing vessels<strong>and</strong> companies because they do not have the capital tobuy ITQs from others. For example, 5 years after theITQ system was implemented in New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, threecompanies controlled half the ITQs. Remedy: Do not allowany fisher or fishing company to accumulate morethan a fifth of the total quota of a fishery.Third, the ITQ system can increase poaching <strong>and</strong>sales of illegally caught fish on the black market, as hashappened to some extent in New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. Some ofthis comes from small-scale fishers who receive noquota or too small a quota to make a living. Some alsocomes from larger-scale fishers who deliberately exceedtheir quotas. Remedy: Require strict record keeping<strong>and</strong> have well-trained observers on all fishing vesselswith quotas.Fourth, the fishing quotas (TACS) are often set toohigh to prevent overfishing. Remedy: Leave 10–50% ofthe estimated MSY of an ITQ fishery as a buffer to protectthe fishery from unexpected decline.13-5 PROTECTING, SUSTAINING,AND RESTORING WETLANDSHow Are Wetl<strong>and</strong>s Protected in the UnitedStates? Some ProgressRequiring government permits for filling or destroyingU.S. wetl<strong>and</strong>s has slowed their loss, but thereare continuing attempts to weaken this protection.Coastal <strong>and</strong> inl<strong>and</strong> wetl<strong>and</strong>s are important reservoirsof aquatic biodiversity that provide many vital ecological<strong>and</strong> economic services. In the United States, a federalpermit is required to fill or to deposit dredged materialinto wetl<strong>and</strong>s occupying more than 1.2 hectares(3 acres). According to the U.S. Fish <strong>and</strong> WildlifeService, this law helped cut the average annual wetl<strong>and</strong>loss by 80% between 1969 <strong>and</strong> 2002.There are continuing attempts to weaken wetl<strong>and</strong>sprotection by using unscientific criteria to classify areasas wetl<strong>and</strong>s. Also, only about 8% of remaining inl<strong>and</strong>wetl<strong>and</strong>s is under federal protection, <strong>and</strong> federal, state,<strong>and</strong> local wetl<strong>and</strong> protection is weak.The stated goal of current U.S. federal policy is zeronet loss in the function <strong>and</strong> value of coastal <strong>and</strong> inl<strong>and</strong>wetl<strong>and</strong>s. A policy known as mitigation banking allowsdestruction of existing wetl<strong>and</strong>s as long as an equalarea of the same type of wetl<strong>and</strong> is created or restored.Some wetl<strong>and</strong> restoration projects have been successful(Individuals Matter, p. 266).However, a 2001 study by the National Academyof Sciences found that at least half of the attempts tocreate new wetl<strong>and</strong>s fail to replace lost ones <strong>and</strong> mostof the created wetl<strong>and</strong>s do not provide the ecologicalfunctions of natural wetl<strong>and</strong>s. In addition, wetl<strong>and</strong>creation projects often fail to meet the st<strong>and</strong>ards set forthem <strong>and</strong> are not adequately monitored.Figure 13-10 lists ways to help sustain wetl<strong>and</strong>s inthe United States <strong>and</strong> elsewhere. Many developers,SolutionsProtecting Wetl<strong>and</strong>sLegally protect existing wetl<strong>and</strong>sSteer development away from existing wetl<strong>and</strong>sUse mitigation banking only as a last resortRequire creation <strong>and</strong> evaluation of a new wetl<strong>and</strong> beforedestroying an existing wetl<strong>and</strong>Restore degraded wetl<strong>and</strong>sTry to prevent <strong>and</strong> control invasions by nonnative speciesFigure 13-10 Solutions: ways to help sustain the world’swetl<strong>and</strong>s.http://biology.brookscole.com/miller14265

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!