12.07.2015 Views

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

What Is the <strong>Environmental</strong> WisdomWorldview? Learning to Work with theEarthAccording to this view we are not in charge,should not waste the earth’s finite resources, <strong>and</strong>should live more sustainably by mimicking the waysin which the earth has sustained itself for billionsof years.As we move out from the center of Figure 28-2, we seelife-centered <strong>and</strong> then earth-centered worldviews.One earth-centered worldview is called the environmentalwisdom worldview. Its major beliefs are summarizedin Figure 28-3 (right). In many respects, it isthe opposite of the planetary management worldview(Figure 28-3, left).According to this worldview, because we are notin charge of the biosphere, we should learn how it hasmaintained itself over billions of years <strong>and</strong> use whatwe learn to sustain ourselves <strong>and</strong> the biosphere intothe future (Figure 9-15, p. 174).This worldview includes the belief that the earthdoes not need us managing it in order to go on,whereas we do need the earth in order to survive. Accordingto this view we cannot save the earth because itdoes not need saving. What we need to save is the existenceof our own species <strong>and</strong> other species that may becomeextinct because of our activities.<strong>Sustainability</strong> expert Lester W. Milbrath asks us totry this thought experiment: “Imagine that, suddenly,all the humans disappeared, but all the buildings,roads, shopping malls, factories, automobiles, <strong>and</strong>other artifacts of modern civilization were left behind.What then? After three or four centuries, buildingswould have crumbled, vehicles would have rusted <strong>and</strong>fallen apart, <strong>and</strong> plants would have recolonized fields,roads, parking lots, even buildings. Water, air, <strong>and</strong> soilwould gradually clear up; some endangered specieswould flourish. Nature would thrive splendidly withoutus.” See Lester Milbrath’s Guest Essay on this topicon the website for this chapter.Others say we do not need to be biocentrists orecocentrists to value life <strong>and</strong> the earth. They point outthat the human-centered stewardship environmentalworldview also calls for us to value individuals,species, <strong>and</strong> the earth’s life-support systems as part ofour responsibility as the earth’s caretakers.What Is the Deep Ecology <strong>Environmental</strong>Worldview? Thinking Deeply about OurResponsibilitiesThe beliefs of deep ecology call for us to think moredeeply about our obligations toward both human<strong>and</strong> nonhuman life.Arelated ecocentric environmental worldview is thedeep ecology worldview, which consists of eight premisesdeveloped in 1972 by Norwegian philosopher ArneNaess, in conjunction with philosopher GeorgeSessions <strong>and</strong> sociologist Bill Devall. First, each nonhumanform of life on the earth has inherent value,independent of its value to humans. Second, the fundamentalinterdependence <strong>and</strong> diversity of life-formscontribute to the flourishing of human <strong>and</strong> nonhumanlife on earth.Third, humans have no right to reduce this interdependence<strong>and</strong> diversity except to satisfy vital needs.Fourth, present human interference with the nonhumanworld is excessive, <strong>and</strong> the situation is worseningrapidly. Fifth, because of the damage caused by this interference,it would be better for humans, <strong>and</strong> muchbetter for nonhumans, if there were a substantial decreasein the human population.Sixth, basic economic <strong>and</strong> technological policiesmust therefore be changed. Seventh, the predominantideology must change such that measurements of thequality of life focus on the overall health of the environment<strong>and</strong> all living things, rather than on the materialwealth of individuals <strong>and</strong> societies. Eighth, those whosubscribe to these points have an obligation directly orindirectly to try to implement the necessary changes.Naess also described some lifestyle guidelinescompatible with the basic beliefs of deep ecology. Theyinclude appreciating all forms of life, consuming less,emphasizing satisfaction of vital needs rather thanwants, working to improve the st<strong>and</strong>ard of living forthe world’s poor, working to eliminate injustice towardfellow humans or other species, <strong>and</strong> acting nonviolently.Deep ecology is not an ecoreligion, nor is it antireligiousor antihuman, as some of its critics haveclaimed. It is a set of beliefs that would have us thinkmore deeply about the inherent value of all life on theearth <strong>and</strong> about our obligations toward all life.What Is the Ecofeminist <strong>Environmental</strong>Worldview? Give Women a FairChanceWomen should be given the same rights as men<strong>and</strong> treated as equal partners in our joint quest todevelop more environmentally sustainable<strong>and</strong> just societies.French writer Françoise d’Eaubonne coined the termecofeminism in 1974. It includes a spectrum of views onthe relationships of women to the earth <strong>and</strong> to maledominatedsocieties (patriarchies). Most ecofeministsagree that we need a life-centered or earth-centeredenvironmental worldview. However, they believe amain cause of our environmental problems is not justhttp://biology.brookscole.com/miller14635

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!