12.07.2015 Views

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

There are problems with the regulatory approach.One is that ecological economists, health scientists,<strong>and</strong> business leaders often disagree in theirestimates of the harmful costs of pollution. Even scientistsin the same field often have different estimatesof such costs because they lack data <strong>and</strong> hold differentassumptions.Also, many regulations are geared toward achievingoptimum levels of pollution over a large area suchas a whole state. Some critics raise environmental justicequestions about who benefits <strong>and</strong> who suffersfrom such regulations. Levels may be optimum for thestate, but not for the people living near or downwindor downriver from a polluting power plant, incinerator,or factory. They are being exposed to much higherlevels of pollution than are the majority of people inthe state. See the Guest Essay on this topic by RobertBullard on the website for this chapter.In addition, assigning monetary values to lostlives, ecosystems, <strong>and</strong> ecological services is difficult<strong>and</strong> controversial, <strong>and</strong> varies widely because of lack ofdata <strong>and</strong> different assumptions <strong>and</strong> value judgments.But assigning little or no value to such things meansthey will not be counted at all in determining optimumpollution levels.Figure 26-11 shows the evolution of several phasesof environmental management through regulation.The period between 1970 <strong>and</strong> 1985 can be viewed asthe resistance-to-change management era, during whichmany companies <strong>and</strong> government regulators developedan adversarial relationship, <strong>and</strong> companies resented<strong>and</strong> actively resisted environmental regulations(Figure 26-11, left). In addition, many government regulatorsthought they had to prescribe ways for reluctantcompanies to clean up their pollution emissions. Mostcompanies responded by hiring outside environmentalconsultants (who usually favored end-of-pipe pollutioncontrol solutions) <strong>and</strong> by using lawyers to opposeor find legal loopholes in the regulations. They also lobbiedelected officials to have environmental laws <strong>and</strong>regulations overthrown, weakened, or changed to allowfor easy compliance.By 1985, most company managers accepted environmentalregulations <strong>and</strong> continued to rely mostly onpollution control. However, they placed little emphasison trying to find innovative solutions to pollution<strong>and</strong> resource waste problems because the regulationswere too strict <strong>and</strong> the market rewards too low.In the 1990s, a growing number of company managersbegan to realize that environmental improvementis an economic <strong>and</strong> competitive opportunityinstead of a cost to be resisted. This was the beginningof the innovative management era, which environmental<strong>and</strong> business visionaries project will gothrough several phases over the next 40–50 years (Figure26-11).During this time, many consumers began buyinggreen products. Some firms also recognized that theirshareholder value depends in part on having a goodenvironmental record. A growing number of firms beganlooking for innovative <strong>and</strong> profitable ways to reduceresource use, pollution, <strong>and</strong> waste (Figure 24-5,p. 537 <strong>and</strong> Individuals Matter, p. 538). As a result, theenvironment is becoming an important component ofbusiness strategic planning. And many corporationsnow routinely issue environmental <strong>and</strong> sustainabilityreports to their stockholders.This has been stimulated by the more than $2 trillionthat exists in environmentally <strong>and</strong> sociallyscreened investment funds <strong>and</strong> environmental <strong>and</strong>sustainability concerns of shareholders, insurancecompanies, bond-ranking agencies, <strong>and</strong> managers ofstate pension funds. In 2002, for example, institutionalinvestors managing over $4.5 trillion in assets wrotethe 500 largest global corporations asking them for fulldisclosure of the emissions of climate-changing gases<strong>and</strong> their policies on reducing the risks from climatechange.Resistance-to-Change ManagementPhase 1 Phase 2Phase 3Innovation-Directed ManagementPhase 4Phase 5Phase 6Pollution control<strong>and</strong> confrontationAcceptance withoutinnovationTotal qualitymanagementLife-cyclemanagementProcessdesignmanagementTotal life qualitymanagementPollution prevention<strong>and</strong> increasedresourceproductivityProductstewardship <strong>and</strong>selling servicesinstead ofthingsCleantechnologyEcoindustrialwebs,environmentallysustainableeconomies<strong>and</strong> societiesFigure 26-11 Solutions: evolution of environmental management.596 CHAPTER 26 Economics, Environment, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Sustainability</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!