12.07.2015 Views

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of cogeneration units or microturbines about the size ofarefrigerator. They run on natural gas or liquefied petroleumgas (LPG) to produce heat <strong>and</strong> electricity forbusinesses, small apartment buildings, neighborhoodgroups of four or five energy-efficient houses, <strong>and</strong>small government facilities such as police stations. In6–8 years, they pay for themselves in saved fuel <strong>and</strong>electricity.■ Heat water more efficiently. One way to do thisis to use a tankless instant water heater (about the sizeof a small suitcase) fired by natural gas or LPG butnot by electricity. These devices, widely used in manyparts of Europe, heat water instantly as it flowsthrough a small burner chamber, provide hot wateronly when it is needed, <strong>and</strong> cost 30–50% less to heatwater than traditional heaters.* They cost 2–4 timesmore than conventional water heaters, but savemoney because they last 3–4 times longer <strong>and</strong> costless to operate than conventional tank heaters.A well-insulated, conventional natural gas orLPG water heater is also fairly efficient. But all conventionalnatural gas <strong>and</strong> electric resistance heaterswaste energy by keeping a large tank of water hot allday <strong>and</strong> night <strong>and</strong> can run out after a long shower ortwo—like running your car all night until you drive it.■ Use energy-efficient appliances.** Since 1978 theDepartment of Energy (DOE) has set federal energyefficiencyst<strong>and</strong>ards for more than 20 appliances usedin the United States, <strong>and</strong> similar programs exist in43 other countries. A 2001 study by the NationalAcademy of Sciences found that between 1978 <strong>and</strong>2000, the $7 billion spent by the DOE on this programsaved consumers more than $30 billion in energy costs<strong>and</strong> provided environmental benefits valued conservativelyat $60–80 billion.If all households in the United States used themost efficient frost-free refrigerator now available,18 large (1,000-megawatt) power plants could close.Microwave ovens can cut electricity use for cookingby 25–50% (but not if used for defrosting food).Clothes dryers with moisture sensors cut energy useby 15%, <strong>and</strong> front-loading washers use 50% less energythan top-loading models but cost about the same.■ Use energy-efficient lighting. Americans spend abouta quarter of their electricity budget on lighting. But*They work very well. I used them in a passive solar office <strong>and</strong>living space for 15 years. Models are available for $500–1,000from companies such as Rinnai, Bosch, Takagi, <strong>and</strong> Envirotech.For information visit http://foreverhotwater.com.**Each year the American Council for an Energy-EfficientEconomy (ACEEE) publishes a list of the most energy-efficientmajor appliances mass-produced for the U.S. market. A copycan be obtained from the council at 1001 Connecticut AvenueNW, Suite 801, Washington, DC 20036, or on its website athttp://www.aceee.org/consumerguide/index.htm.many do not realize that they could cut these costs30–60% by replacing energy-wasting inc<strong>and</strong>escentbulbs <strong>and</strong> halogen torchiere bulbs (which because oftheir high heat output have caused fires <strong>and</strong> increasedair conditioning costs) with much more efficientfluorescent bulbs. They cost $5–10 but last6–10 times longer than an inc<strong>and</strong>escent <strong>and</strong> pay forthemselves in a year or two. Three-way <strong>and</strong> dimmableversions are now available (see http://www.tcpi.com). Replacing 25 inc<strong>and</strong>escent bulbs in a house orbuilding with energy-efficient fluorescent bulbs typicallysaves about $1,125. What a great investmentpayoff.Students in Brown University’s environmentalstudies program showed that the school could savemore than $40,000 per year just by replacing the inc<strong>and</strong>escentlight bulbs in exit signs with compactfluorescent bulbs. What is your school doing to saveelectricity <strong>and</strong> money in lighting?However, these <strong>and</strong> other fluorescent bulbscontain toxic mercury than when discarded cancontaminate l<strong>and</strong>fills <strong>and</strong> groundwater or get into theatmosphere if incinerated. A Florida company collectsused bulbs <strong>and</strong> extracts the toxic mercury for reuse.Within the next two decades, both inc<strong>and</strong>escent<strong>and</strong> fluorescent bulbs may be replaced by even moreefficient white-light LEDs (light-emitting diodes) <strong>and</strong>organic LEDs (OLEDs). Westinghouse is selling a 20-watt LED bulb with a light output equal to a 100-wattinc<strong>and</strong>escent bulb. It costs $40, but saves money becauseit lasts 80 times longer than inc<strong>and</strong>escents (seehttp://westinghouselighting.com).■ Cut off electrical devices when not using them. Cuttingoff lights, computers, TVs, <strong>and</strong> other applianceswhen they are not needed <strong>and</strong> cutting off their instant-onfeature can make a big difference in energyuse <strong>and</strong> bills. At 9 P.M. one weekday evening, majorTV stations in Bangkok, Thail<strong>and</strong>, cooperated withthe government in showing a dial that gave the city’scurrent use of electricity. Viewers were asked to turnoff unnecessary lights <strong>and</strong> appliances. They thenwatched the dial register a 735-megawatt drop inelectricity use—a decrease equal to the output of twomedium-sized coal-burning power plants. This visualexperience showed individuals that reducing theirunnecessary electricity use could cut their bills <strong>and</strong>close down power plants.■ Set strict energy-efficiency st<strong>and</strong>ards for new buildings.Building codes could require new houses use 60–80%less energy than conventional houses of the same size,as has been done in Davis, California. Because oftough national energy-efficiency st<strong>and</strong>ards, the averagehome in Sweden consumes about one-third asmuch energy as the average American home of thesame size.390 CHAPTER 18 Energy Efficiency <strong>and</strong> Renewable Energy

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!