12.07.2015 Views

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

How Dangerous Are Dioxins? ControversyOver Unintended CulpritsDioxins are potentially harmful chlorinatedhydrocarbons produced as by-products of variousindustrial processes such as waste incineration <strong>and</strong>paper bleaching.Dioxins (or polychlorinated dibenzodioxins) are afamily of more than 75 different chlorinated hydrocarboncompounds. They form as by-products in hightemperaturechemical reactions involving chlorine<strong>and</strong> hydrocarbons.Dioxins (or polychlorinated dibenzodioxins) aremainly unwanted by-products or unintended consequencesof a wide range of industrial processes. Naturalprocesses such as forest fires <strong>and</strong> volcanic eruptionsalso produce them.Worldwide, incineration of municipal <strong>and</strong> medicalwastes accounts for about 70% of dioxin <strong>and</strong> furan releasesto the atmosphere. Other sources include woodburningfireplaces, coal-fired power plants, metalsmelting <strong>and</strong> refining facilities, wood-pulp <strong>and</strong> papermills, <strong>and</strong> sludge from municipal wastewater treatmentplants.Toxicology studies indicate that about 30 dioxincompounds have significant toxicity. One dioxin compound,TCDD, is the most toxic (Table 19-1, p. 414) <strong>and</strong>the most widely studied. Dioxins are persistent chemicalsthat linger in the environment for decades, especiallyin soil <strong>and</strong> human fat tissue. About 90% of thehuman exposure to trace levels of dioxins occursthrough eating contaminated food.There is concern about possible harmful healtheffects on humans <strong>and</strong> wildlife from exposure to lowlevels of dioxins. A 2001 draft report of an EPAsponsoredcomprehensive review of the scientific literatureby more than 100 scientists around the worldcame to three major conclusions.First, TCDD is a human carcinogen, <strong>and</strong> otherdioxin compounds are likely human carcinogens, especiallyfor people who eat large amounts of fattymeats <strong>and</strong> dairy products. Second, the most powerfulpossible effects of exposure to low levels of dioxin onhumans are disruption of the reproductive, endocrine,<strong>and</strong> immune systems (Case Study, p. 416) <strong>and</strong> harmfuleffects on developing fetuses. Third, very low levels ofdioxin in the environment can cause serious damageto certain wildlife species. But industries producingdioxins say the dangers of long-term exposure of humansto low levels of dioxins are overestimated.Because it will take decades to resolve these issues,some environmental <strong>and</strong> health scientists call for usinga precautionary strategy to sharply reduce emissions ofdioxins now. This would be done mostly by banningthe use of chlorine for bleaching paper (as severalEuropean countries have done) <strong>and</strong> eliminating chlorinatedhydrocarbon compounds that produce dioxinsfrom hazardous wastes burned in incinerators, iron oresintering plants, <strong>and</strong> cement kilns.A 2003 report by the National Academy of Sciencesrecommended that the United States take precautionarysteps to reduce dioxin levels, especially in food. Thepanel of medical experts called for testing livestock forage<strong>and</strong> feed for dioxins, setting lower limits for dioxinsin food products <strong>and</strong> dietary supplements, <strong>and</strong> testingthe products for dioxin levels. They also said thegovernment should encourage people to eat less fat<strong>and</strong> meat, which tend to have higher levels of dioxins.Bad news. These things are not being done.24-9 HAZARDOUS WASTEREGULATION IN THE UNITEDSTATESWhat Is the Resource Conservation <strong>and</strong>Recovery Act? Tracking Hazardous Wastefrom Cradle to GraveU.S. firms producing fairly large amounts ofhazardous waste must get a permit from the EPA<strong>and</strong> submit a record tracking these wastes fromproduction to disposal.In 1976, the U.S. Congress passed the Resource Conservation<strong>and</strong> Recovery Act (RCRA, mentioned previously)<strong>and</strong> amended it in 1984. This law has three major requirements.First, the EPA is to identify hazardouswastes <strong>and</strong> set st<strong>and</strong>ards for their management bystates. Second, firms that store, treat, or dispose of morethan 100 kilograms (220 pounds) of hazardous wastesper month must have a permit stating how suchwastes are to be managed. Third, permit holders mustuse a cradle-to-grave system to keep track of waste theytransfer from a point of generation (cradle) to an approvedoff-site disposal facility (grave) <strong>and</strong> submitproof of this to the EPA.What Is the Superfund Act? Cleaning UpAb<strong>and</strong>oned Waste SitesIn the United States, the EPA identifies ab<strong>and</strong>onedhazardous waste sites, cleans them up, <strong>and</strong> sends thebill to all responsible parties it can find.In 1980, the U.S. Congress passed the Comprehensive<strong>Environmental</strong> Response, Compensation, <strong>and</strong> Liability Act,commonly known as the CERCLA or Superfund program.Through taxes on chemical raw materials, thislaw plus later amendments has provided a trust fundto achieve three goals.One is to identify ab<strong>and</strong>oned hazardous wastedump sites (Spotlight, p. 559), underground tanksleaking toxic chemicals, <strong>and</strong> other hazardous wastesites. Second is to protect <strong>and</strong> if necessary clean upgroundwater near such sites <strong>and</strong> to clean up the sites.558 CHAPTER 24 Solid <strong>and</strong> Hazardous Waste

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!