12.07.2015 Views

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

After more than 50 years of development, enormousgovernment subsidies, <strong>and</strong> an investment of $2trillion worldwide, these goals have not been met. Instead,by 2002, 441 commercial nuclear reactors in 30countries were producing only 6% of the world’s commercialenergy <strong>and</strong> 19% of its electricity.Since 1989, electricity production from nuclearpower has increased only slightly <strong>and</strong> is now theworld’s slowest-growing energy source. According tothe U.S. Department of Energy, the percentage of theworld’s electricity produced by nuclear power will fallto 12% by 2025 because the retirement of aging existingreactors is expected to exceed construction of new ones.No new nuclear power plants have been orderedin the United States since 1978, <strong>and</strong> all 120 plants orderedsince 1973 have been canceled. In 2004, therewere 103 licensed <strong>and</strong> operating commercial nuclearpower reactors in 31 states—most in the eastern half ofthe country (Figure 17-25). Is there a nuclear reactor inyour vicinity? These reactors generate about 21% of thecountry’s electricity <strong>and</strong> 8% of its total energy. This percentageis expected to decline over the next two to threedecades as existing plants wear out <strong>and</strong> are retired.According to energy analysts <strong>and</strong> economists,there are several major reasons for the failure of nuclearpower to grow as projected. They include multibilliondollarconstruction cost overruns, higher operatingcosts <strong>and</strong> more malfunctions than expected, <strong>and</strong> poormanagement. Two other major setbacks have beenpublic concerns about safety <strong>and</strong> stricter governmentsafety regulations, especially after the accidents in 1979at the Three Mile Isl<strong>and</strong> nuclear plant in Pennsylvania<strong>and</strong> in 1986 at Chernobyl (p. 350).Another problem is investor concerns about theeconomic feasibility of nuclear power that take intoaccount the entire nuclear fuel cycle. At Three MileIsl<strong>and</strong>, investors lost over a billion dollars in one hourfrom damaged equipment <strong>and</strong> repair, even though the1Wash. 11Ore.1Nev.Calif.212IdahoUtah3 Ariz.Mont.Wyo.1Colo.N.M.N.H.MaineVt.N.D.1Minn.11 11 Mass.11 21 1Wis. 1N.Y. 1S.D.21 R.I.21Mich.1 222Conn.2 1 1 1 Pa. 1 1Iowa 22 1 21222 1 1 N.J.Neb. 12 2 1 Ohio2Ind.2Del.12Ill.12W.Va. Md.Va.2Kan. 1 1Mo.Ky.121N.C.Tenn.2 32 2Okla. 21 1Ark.S.C.32Ga.Miss. Ala.221La.2Texas1 1 1Alaska2Fla.22HawaiiReactors1 Operational Yucca Mountain high-level1 Decommissioned nuclear waste storage siteFigure 17-25 Locations of the United States’ 103 operating commercial nuclear power plant reactors, 14 decommissionedreactors (with highly radioactive used fuel stored on site), <strong>and</strong> the recently approved site inNevada for storage of highly radioactive used fuel from operating <strong>and</strong> decommissioned nuclear reactors.Numbers refer to the number of reactors at each nuclear power plant site. There are at least 30 other sites(mostly in the West) containing high-level nuclear wastes produced mostly by making nuclear weapons that willalso ship wastes to Nevada’s Yucca Mountain underground storage site. (Data from U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission <strong>and</strong> U.S. Department of Energy)http://biology.brookscole.com/miller14369

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!