12.07.2015 Views

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

Environmental Problems, Their Causes, and Sustainability 1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EPA advised women who may become pregnant, pregnantwomen, <strong>and</strong> nursing mothers not to eat shark,swordfish, king mackerel, or tilefish <strong>and</strong> to limit theirconsumption of albacore tuna to no more than 170grams (6 ounces) per week. They also advised such individualsto check local advisories about the safety offish caught in local lakes, rivers, <strong>and</strong> coastal areas.Levels of methylmercury in lakes <strong>and</strong> lake organismsappear to be connected to acid deposition, becausethe conversion rate of inorganic mercury tomethylmercury is higher in acidified lakes.According to a 2001 study by the Centers forDisease Control <strong>and</strong> Prevention, 8% of Americanwomen of childbearing age risk having a baby bornwith irreversible neurological problems because of exposureof the fetus to mercury, mostly from the mothereating seafood contaminated with methylmercury.<strong>Problems</strong> include brain <strong>and</strong> nerve system damage thatcan result in cerebral palsy, delayed onset of walking<strong>and</strong> talking, learning disabilities, tremors, irritability,impaired coordination, <strong>and</strong> memory loss. In theUnited States, up to 300,000 babies born each year areat risk from such problems due to mercury exposurewhile in the womb.Figure 24-27 lists ways to prevent or control humanexposure to mercury. In its 2003 report on global mercurypollution, the UN EnvironmentProgramme recommendedphasing out coalburning <strong>and</strong> waste incinerationas rapidly as possible.PreventionPhase out wasteincinerationRemove mercury fromcoal before it is burnedConvert coal to liquidor gaseous fuelSwitch from coal tonatural gas <strong>and</strong>renewable energyresources suchas wind, solar cells,<strong>and</strong> hydrogenPhase out use ofmercury in all productsunless they are recycledIn 2003, environmentalengineers David Mazyck <strong>and</strong>Chang Yu Wu at the Universityof Florida developed away to remove much of themercury from smokestackemissions. They inject tinyparticles of silica <strong>and</strong> a chemicalthat, when exposed to UVlight, produces highly reactivemolecules that removemost of the mercury insmokestack gases. The mercurycan be removed from thesilica so that the silica can bereused. And the mercury canbe sold for use in productssuch as fluorescent bulbs. Theresearchers have founded acompany, Sol-gel PowerTechnologies, to develop thetechnology.In 2000, the U.S. EPA officiallydetermined that mercuryis a hazardous substanceas defined by the Clean Air Act, which requiresthat emissions of such substances be strictly controlled.However, in 2003 the Bush administration opposedinternational limits on mercury emissions <strong>and</strong>other m<strong>and</strong>atory measures aimed at reducing the riskof mercury exposure, mostly from burning coal <strong>and</strong> incineratinghazardous wastes. Also, government analysisshows that President Bush’s proposed Clear Skiesair pollution control program will reduce mercury pollutionless than current regulations under the CleanAir Act <strong>and</strong> could allow emissions of mercury to tripleby 2013. In 2003, by executive order President Bush exemptedthe country’s more polluting coal-burningpower plants from having to follow a rule in the CleanAir Act that would require them to upgrade their airpollution control equipment whenever they do a significantexpansion (p. 456). This will further delay reducingmercury emissions by exempting the plantswith the highest mercury emissions from the requirementsof the Clean Air Act <strong>and</strong> result in hot spots nearsuch plants with high mercury levels.xHOW WOULD YOU VOTE? Should coal-burning electricity<strong>and</strong> industrial plants be required to sharply reduce mercuryemissions? Cast your vote online at http://biology.brookscole.com/miller14.SolutionsMercury PollutionControlSharply reduce mercuryemissions from coalburningplants <strong>and</strong>incineratorsTax each unit of mercuryemitted by coal-burningplants <strong>and</strong> incineratorsCollect <strong>and</strong> recyclemercury-containingelectric switches, relays,<strong>and</strong> dry-cell batteriesRequire labels on allproducts containingmercuryFigure 24-27 Solutions: ways to prevent or control inputs of mercury into the environment fromhuman activities—mostly through coal-burning plants <strong>and</strong> incinerators. Which two of these solutionsdo you believe are the most important?http://biology.brookscole.com/miller14557

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!