01.12.2012 Views

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

esults (Tracey, Linden et al. 1990), but may not be sensitive or specific enough to measure<br />

NO alone (Schmidt and Kelm t996),<br />

NO will rapidly convert to nitrite and nitrate in biological samples and by adding acids or<br />

reducing substances these can be transformed back to release the NO molecule (Verdon,<br />

Burton et al. 1995; Kelm, Dahmann et al. 1997). However acidification and/or reduction will<br />

release NO from all nitroso compounds, alkyl or inorganic nitrites, the nitrosamines and<br />

nitrosothiols. If the sample contains compounds other than nitrite and nitrate, then there may<br />

be overestimation <strong>of</strong> the NO that existed as a biologically active or inflammatory mediator.<br />

4.5 Nitric oxide<br />

It has become possible to measure NO directly down to the cellular level by using<br />

microelectrodes. This cornmenced with the modification <strong>of</strong> a miniature 02 electrode, and<br />

sealing it so that only low molecular weight gases could enter. By introducing a positive<br />

voltage, NO was oxidised on the surface <strong>of</strong> the electrode and could be measured over l-<br />

3pmol range (Shibuki 1990). <strong>The</strong> probe was approximately 2mm in diameter. Modification <strong>of</strong><br />

this then allowed a much smaller microsensor to be developed using a semi conductor<br />

polymeric porphyrin and a cationic exchanger on a sharpened carbon tip which reduced the<br />

size to 5 microns (Malinski and Taha 1992; Taha, Kiechle et al.1992) and could measure NO<br />

as an electrical current. This has allowed NO measurement in cardiac cells (Xian ,Zhang et al.<br />

2000; Kanai, Pearce et al. 2001; Katrlik and Zalesakova2002),brain and nerve cells (Shibuki<br />

1990; Taha, Kiechle et al. 1992: Malinski, Bailey et al. 1993; Kumar, Porterfield et al. 2001),<br />

osteoclasts (Silverton, Adebanjo et al. 1999), trachea and main bronchi from an animal model<br />

(Ricciardolo, Vergnani et al. 2000) and in suspensions <strong>of</strong> mitochondria and cells such as<br />

platelets, leukocytes and in cell cultures (Wadsworth, Stankevicius et aL.2006). <strong>The</strong> detection<br />

rate has been as low as 10-20 Mol, with a linear response between 8.0 to 4.8 x 10-6 mol/L. This<br />

low detection limit is also matched by high sensitivity and selectivity although it does also<br />

detect catecholamine activity (Tu, Xue et al. 2000). It has also been achieved as an online<br />

measurement so release <strong>of</strong> NO could be followed in activated macrophages, which correlated<br />

well with the nitrite concentration determined by the Greiss assay (Cserey and Gratzl 2001).<br />

However a recent review suggested that further methodological development <strong>of</strong> these<br />

microsensors was needed in order to avoid the influence <strong>of</strong> changes in temperature, pH, and<br />

oxygen on the measurements (Wadsworth, Stankevicius et al. 2006).<br />

My interest was to look at measurement in exhaled breath. A number <strong>of</strong> very early methods <strong>of</strong><br />

detection depended on colorimetric analysis but for exhalate these were too slow and too<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!