01.12.2012 Views

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

led to an increased water content that decreased measured NO levels, though this could be<br />

minimised by exhaling through a water absorber into the reservoir bags (Steerenberg,<br />

Nierkens et al. 2000). NO online measurement correlated well with NO measured via a<br />

balloon technique (mylar foil) when measured immediately during times <strong>of</strong> low air pollution<br />

and high pollution days (van Amsterdam, Verlaan et al. 1999). Another group disagreed and<br />

showed that the online measurement was higher than the mylar bag reservoir results when<br />

both were measured immediately (Silk<strong>of</strong>f, Stevens et al. 1999), though the <strong>of</strong>fline<br />

measurements were similar to the end expiratory online measurements (Jobsis, Schellekens et<br />

al. 2001). NO concentration in the mylar bag was also shown to actually increase at24 and48<br />

hours after collection (Silk<strong>of</strong>f, Stevens et al. 1999). When the first European Respiratory<br />

Society Task Force (ERSTF) recommendations were published regarding the measurement <strong>of</strong><br />

exhaled air, they recommended the online technique <strong>of</strong> measurement (Kharitonov, Alving et<br />

al. 1997).In some initial testing we did, teflon and "wine cask bags" (which are mylar foil<br />

bags) did not seem to absorb NO, but a Douglas bag did seem to absorb NO and the material<br />

<strong>of</strong> the bag became sticky. <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> teflon or teflon coated tubing to connect the reservoir or<br />

the subject to the analysers appeared to minimise NO loss.<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the purpose <strong>of</strong> the studies, the online technique seemed more appropriate as it<br />

allowed comparison <strong>of</strong> signals throughout the exhalation and allowed an alteration <strong>of</strong> the test<br />

conditions to investigate how this affected NO results. A slow controlled exhalation from total<br />

lung capacity appeared to be the most satisfactory exhalation for observing the results. This<br />

manoeuvre yielded obvious NO and CO2 traces and most people, including most children in<br />

the age group studied, could be easily trained to perform this correctly. Thus I could discard<br />

the reservoir system for most <strong>of</strong> the studies which I believe excluded another uncertain<br />

element from test measures.<br />

5.5 Other measurements<br />

For all the experiments utilising the healthy adult volunteers and normal and asthmatic<br />

children, a respiratory examination was carried out, and weight (minimal clothing, no shoes)<br />

and height were recorded on a digital Seca scale (Seca 770 medical scales, Seca Ltd, 4802<br />

Glenwood Rd, Brooklyn NYI1234, USA) and a Harpenden stadiometer (Harpenden Portable<br />

Stadiometer, Crosswell, Crymych, Pembrokeshire, SA41 3UF, UK) respectively. Lung<br />

function was measured according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria (American<br />

Thoracic Society and Association. 1994) on a compact vitalograph (Vitalograph Ltd, Maids<br />

t20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!