01.12.2012 Views

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

etween these researchers were documented in the literature for other subject groups such as<br />

those with asthma, bronchiectasis, hypertension and smokers. <strong>The</strong> measurement <strong>of</strong> NO in<br />

these studies did vary between mean peak exhaled NO, mean plateau exhaled NO and NO<br />

measured during tidal breathing. This led me to the suspicion that the technique <strong>of</strong><br />

measurement critically affected the No levels obtained. In the first methodological study in<br />

twelve healthy adults (Byrnes, Dinarevic et al. 1997), I demonstrated that the concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

NO obtained could be halved depending on whether the subject was breathing directly into<br />

the No analyser (mean 84.Sppb) or breathing through a t-piece system (mean 41.2ppb)' <strong>The</strong><br />

main difference between these two methods was a change in flow from 440 mls/min to 665<br />

mls/min. <strong>The</strong> methodology experiments detailed in this chapter were therefore designed to<br />

determine what factors altered the concentration <strong>of</strong> exhaled No obtained.<br />

In the second methodological study, changing the expiratory flow rate significantly altered the<br />

mean concentration <strong>of</strong> NO obtained. <strong>The</strong> higher the expiratory flow' the lower the<br />

concentrations recorded, with a mean decrease <strong>of</strong> 35ppb when moving from 25omls/min to<br />

1100mls/min in ten subjects (see Figure 7.1). Most <strong>of</strong> the literature at the time in the cross<br />

sectional studies had usually mentioned the samplin g rate <strong>of</strong> the machine only, or measured<br />

tidal volumes over a L-2 minute time periods with none specifically noting a standard<br />

expiratory flow. Alving et al reported that if the airflow was increased in 12 healthy controls<br />

from2umin-l to 5 Umin-l a slight increase in the levels <strong>of</strong> No was noted -<br />

the data were not<br />

shown and the increase was noted to be insignificant. This proved a different finding from<br />

most others (Alving 1993). Imada et al showed a hyperbolic relationship between the NO<br />

concentration and the sampling flow rate (see Figure 7'10) with a marked reduction <strong>of</strong><br />

exhaled No when increasing flow in one subject (Imada 1996).<br />

t7r

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!