01.12.2012 Views

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

group. Rates <strong>of</strong> exacerbation were 0.49 episodes/patient/year in the exhaled No managed<br />

group and 0.90 in the guideline group, representin g a 45.6Vo exacerbation reduction in the No<br />

group, although this did not reach significance. <strong>The</strong>re were no significant differences in<br />

pulmonary function changes, sputum eosinophils or the use <strong>of</strong> oral prednisone (Smith' Cowan<br />

et al. 2005). Similar to the adult study, children on IHCS were allocated to groups where<br />

treatment decisions were made by symptomatology in 46 or with the addition <strong>of</strong> exhaled No<br />

in 39. Over the next year, those monitored using the NO readings had improved airway hyper-<br />

responsiveness from 2.5 to 1.1 doubling dose, lesS Severe exacerbations at eight versus 18',<br />

and a trend to improved FEVr (Pijnenburg, Bakker et al. 2005). <strong>The</strong>se studies suggest that No<br />

can successfully be used longitudinally for individual patients to predict exacerbations and to<br />

aid management deci sions re gardin g treatment'<br />

9.8.6 Wat happens to nitric oxide during an acute asthma attack?<br />

Most studies have examined NO levels during chronic asthma disease over time' So what<br />

happens to NO levels in the acute phase? Studies have used allergen challenges to simulate an<br />

acute asthmatic exacerbation. It appears that even when the No is similar in the asthmatic and<br />

control groups at baseline, No increases in the asthmatic groups during the late asthmatic<br />

reaction (Obata, Dittrick et al. 1999; Paredi, Irckie et al' 1999; Khatri' Hammel et al' 2003;<br />

Ihre, Gyllfors et al. 2006). It was found to increase three fold from baseline 24 hours post<br />

challenge (Khatri, Hammel et al. 2003). Repeated low dose allergen inhalation in 8 mild<br />

asthmatic subjects demonstrated an increased exhaled NO despite no change seen in asthma<br />

symptoms or lung function (Ihre, Gyllfors et al. 2006)' <strong>The</strong>se findings suggest that in acute<br />

asthma an increased production requiring synthesis <strong>of</strong> the NOS enzymes occulred and<br />

therefore some time was needed to appreciate the full insult (Khatri, Hammel et al' 2003)'<br />

This may also explain why the use <strong>of</strong> No to dictate treatment acutely has been less successful'<br />

one study used the exhaled No levels to dictate the degree <strong>of</strong> treatment given to adult<br />

patients presenting to the emergency department with an asthma exacerbation' <strong>The</strong> study was<br />

discontinued after the first 53 enrolled subjects as those in whom the management <strong>of</strong>fered was<br />

decided on their exhaled NO levels did less well when followed up than those in whom the<br />

management was decided by the more traditional measures <strong>of</strong> clinical scores or spirometry<br />

(Gill, Walker et al. 2005).<br />

g.8.7 What is the effect <strong>of</strong> atopy alone on nitric oxide?<br />

In assessing the validity <strong>of</strong> exhaled No to assist in screening, diagnosis and longitudinal<br />

monitoring <strong>of</strong> asthma control, the effect <strong>of</strong> atopy alone must be taken into account' A number<br />

233

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!