01.12.2012 Views

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9.5 Off-line measurement<br />

NO determinations can be measured from samples collected into a reservoir system and later<br />

fed through a cheminiluminescence analyzer. Similar to early online experiments, while the<br />

absolute levels <strong>of</strong> NO measured by reservoir collection varied between investigators, the<br />

findings across disease entities remained consistent (Alving, Weitzberg et al. 1993; Persson,<br />

Wiklund et al. 1993; Kharitonov, Yates et al. L994; Kharitonov, Yates et al. 1995; Massaro,<br />

Gaston et al. 1995; Deykin, Halpern et al. 1998).<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> standardisation issues arose with this technique. Firstly, the concern regarding<br />

NO reactivity and that inert collection bags would be required. Other factors that could affect<br />

stability included temperature, light exposure, damage to bags, leaks and pressure changes.<br />

Mylar or tedlar bags were early reported as the most stable (Kharitonov, Alving et al. 1997)<br />

with NO levels consistent up to 12 hours post collection (Massaro, Gaston et al. 1995;<br />

Massaro, Mehta et al. 1996; Canady, Platts-Mills et al. 1999; Jobsis, Schellekens et al. 2001).<br />

Some investigators reported continued stability for 24-48 hours @aredi, Loukides et al. 1998;<br />

Djupesland, Qian et al. 2001), while others found an increase in the NO concentration<br />

(Silk<strong>of</strong>fl Stevens et al. 1999). NO collected in a reservoir containing silica gel was stable for<br />

24 hours @aredi, Ioukides et al. 1998). One $oup<br />

used a tube collection system showing<br />

better online and <strong>of</strong>f-line agreement than bag collections for both exhaled and nasal levels<br />

@jupesland, Qian et al. 2001). Reservoir stability also depends on temperature. NO results<br />

appeared to be stable for nine hours at 4o to 37oC but increased between nine and 48 hours in<br />

samples with initially low concentrations. It was not stable at higher temperatures and the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> a drying agent did not improve the stability (Bodini, Pijnenburg et al. 2003). One study<br />

evaluated 185 breaths in bags that were re-used 10-20 times flushing three times with NO free<br />

air between uses and stored at 22oC. Over a four day period, the samples with low NO<br />

increased in a linear fashion, and those with high NO from asthmatic subjects showed a<br />

gradual decrease (Silk<strong>of</strong>f, Stevens et al. L999; Kharitonov, Gonio et al. 2OO3). Higher<br />

temperatures made the changes more rapid and lower temperatures made it less likely to<br />

occur. <strong>The</strong> size <strong>of</strong> the balloon was not thought to be critical but was recommended to be<br />

similar to, or larger than, the subjects' vital capacity (Linn, Avila et al. 2004).<br />

Secondly, uncertainty existed as to whether the collection should be a single exhaled breath,<br />

several 'single exhaled breaths' or tidal breathing. <strong>The</strong> reproducibility with single breaths<br />

appeared to be fair or good with intra-subject coefficients <strong>of</strong> variation down to 5Vo (Gaston,<br />

216

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!