01.12.2012 Views

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 6.11b: COz levels at peak NO and at peak CO2 measured by the t-piece system<br />

88<br />

o<br />

!g'I<br />

ot<br />

E6<br />

F5 g4<br />

4<br />

t!<br />

E3<br />

E2<br />

{r<br />

8o GOrat NO peak PeakCO,<br />

:<br />

Comparisons <strong>of</strong> the COz conc€Dtrations in percent <strong>of</strong> total expired gases at the time <strong>of</strong> peak NO and<br />

at peak COz in measurements by the direct system (n=12, each mean <strong>of</strong> 5 exhalations).<br />

6.7 Discussion: <strong>The</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> the exhaled nitric oxide<br />

<strong>The</strong> study demonstrated that NO from a single exhalation could be measured by two methods;<br />

either by direct connection to the NO analyser or by using a t-piece side arm sampling system.<br />

However the results <strong>of</strong> NO were significantly different with an approximate halving <strong>of</strong> the<br />

peak levels from the direct to t-piece technique, while there was no difference seen in the COz<br />

results. <strong>The</strong>se methods gave similar individual coefficients <strong>of</strong> variation as other groups<br />

(Kharitonov, Yates et al. 1994; Monis, Caroll et al. 1995; Jilma, Kastner et al. 1996;<br />

Massaro, Mehta et al, 1996; Hogman, Stromberg et al. 1997). <strong>The</strong> NO results from the female<br />

subjects showed greater variability, and this has been noted previously as possibly being an<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> the menstrual cycle in one (Kharitonov, lngan-Sinclair et al. 1994) but not a second<br />

paper (Jilma, Kastner et al. 1996). Our subjects were chosen to minimise any other<br />

confounding factors most notably being non atopic, non-asthmatic and having normal lung<br />

function. As noted in the total group <strong>of</strong> subjects from which all the studies were done, there<br />

were two smokers (two cigarettes per day) which was not ideal but I believed controlling for<br />

atopy was more important when excluding subjects. As it happened, neither subject took part<br />

in this direct versus t-piece experiment but were involved in later experiments.<br />

Previous researchers had been unable to agree whether NO was <strong>of</strong> alveolar or airway origin<br />

(Alving, Weitzberg et al. 1993; Borland, Cox et al. 1993; Persson, Wiklund et al. 1993). It is<br />

known that the vast bulk <strong>of</strong> COz is <strong>of</strong> alveolar origin, having diffused across the<br />

alveolar:capillary membrane from the pulmonary circulation. If COz and NO were both <strong>of</strong><br />

alveolar origin, the time to reach their respective peaks and the ratio <strong>of</strong> peak NO to COz<br />

would remain the same even if measurement conditions were varied. I thus measured exhaled<br />

148

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!