01.12.2012 Views

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sensitive and to have good negative predictive value in getting a response in asthmatics who<br />

have recent or current symptoms. This comes at the cost <strong>of</strong> being less specific and having less<br />

positive predictive value or being useful for population screening for asthma (Cockcr<strong>of</strong>t,<br />

Murdock et al. 1992). As part <strong>of</strong> the ECRHS, bronchial hyper-reactivity using standardised<br />

methacholine challenges was tested in over 13,000 adult subjects in 35 centres from 16<br />

countries showing considerable variation in incidence (Chinn, Burney et al. 1997). In some<br />

this mirrored their known rates <strong>of</strong> asthma disease, such as being high in New Zealand, Great<br />

Britain, Australia and the USA, and low in Iceland and Switzerland. <strong>The</strong>re was less <strong>of</strong> an<br />

obvious connection in others, for example showing high rates <strong>of</strong> hyper-reactivity in Denmark<br />

which has far lower documented asthma prevalence than, for example, Italy, Spain or Sweden<br />

which all had low reactivity rates. In an early study <strong>of</strong> 307 adults, bronchial reactivity was<br />

noted in 3Vo <strong>of</strong> normal subjects, l00vo <strong>of</strong> symptomatic asthmatics, 69Vo <strong>of</strong> currently<br />

asymptomatic asthmatics (Cockcr<strong>of</strong>t, Killian et al. 1977). In other studies, the proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

individuals with bronchial hyper-responsiveness was only about 40-60Vo <strong>of</strong> those reporting<br />

current wheeze (Backer, Dirksen et al. 1991; Backer, Groth et al. l99l; Backer and Ulrik<br />

1992; GINA 2005).<br />

As well as some 'normals' responding in what is deemed the asthmatic range (Cockcr<strong>of</strong>t,<br />

Killian et al. 1977; Cockcr<strong>of</strong>t, Murdock et al. 1992). the direct airway challenges are also non-<br />

specific, as subjects with other respiratory diseases also react, most notably cough (Brooke,<br />

Lambert et al. 1998), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and/or chronic<br />

bronchitis (CB) (Ramsdell, Nachtwey et al. 1982; Ramsdale, Roberts et al. 1985; Calverley,<br />

Burge et al. 2003).<br />

Direct airway challenges in children are limited to older age groups. In over 2000 children<br />

aged 7-10 years tested with a cumulative dose <strong>of</strong> 3.9;rmol <strong>of</strong> histamine, only 5BVo <strong>of</strong> the<br />

children with asthma and current symptoms responded. While 52Vo <strong>of</strong> those diagnosed with<br />

asthma responded overall, 53Vo <strong>of</strong> subjects demonstrating bronchial hyperactivity had no<br />

asthma diagnosis (Pattemore, Asher et al. 1990). In three regions with similar asthma<br />

admissions (<strong>Auckland</strong>, inland New South Wales and coastal New South Wales) between 700<br />

to over l'000 children were tested at each centre and while two groups had similar rates <strong>of</strong><br />

bronchial hyper-reactivity to methacholine challenges, the third had a much lower rate (Asher,<br />

Pattemore et al. 1988). <strong>The</strong> hyper-reactivity to direct airway challenge has a similar sensitivity<br />

and specificity pr<strong>of</strong>ile for asthma diagnosis as questionnaire data (Asher, pattemore et al.<br />

1988; Backer, Dirksen et al. I99l; Bakke, Baste et al. l99l; Backer and LJlrik 1992; Joos,<br />

O'Connor et al. 2003). In one <strong>of</strong> these studies, the level <strong>of</strong> bronchial hyper-reactivity was a<br />

l9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!