01.12.2012 Views

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ambient No was less than 10ppb the exhaled No was increased after a 10 second breath-hold<br />

(Jobsis, Schellekens et al. 2001).<br />

9.3.1 (iv) <strong>The</strong> recorded measurement<br />

<strong>The</strong> NO recorded in the literature has been peak, plateau, area under the curve or NO plateau<br />

signal at COz peak. <strong>The</strong> current recommendation is for plateau levels to be reported' unless<br />

calculating NO output. This requires a plateau <strong>of</strong> three seconds following exhalation <strong>of</strong> at<br />

least six seconds for participants older than 12 years <strong>of</strong> age' or two seconds following<br />

exhalation for at least four seconds for children less than 12 years <strong>of</strong> age' <strong>The</strong> peak<br />

measurement has shown more variability as influenced by the degfee <strong>of</strong> dead space' ambient<br />

NO and inspiration taken via nose or mouth. An expiratory flow <strong>of</strong> 50mls/s ensures an<br />

acceptable time to plateau, an acceptable rate <strong>of</strong> decline in lung volumes and is appropriate<br />

for children at less than 12 years <strong>of</strong> age, as well as those with vital capacities less than one<br />

litre (Pfaff and Morgan l994;Canady, Platts-Mills et al. 1999; Franklin, Taplin et al' 1999;<br />

Kissoon, Duckworth et al. 1999).<br />

9.3.1 (v) <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> ambient nitric oxide<br />

Recommendations since 199? have been to record the ambient NO as this fluctuates<br />

considerably. A note from one <strong>of</strong> the authors (A Sovijarvi, Helsinki <strong>University</strong> Central<br />

Hospital, Finland) in this document states; the ambient NO was noted to vary between I and<br />

600ppb during winter months in their studies (Kharitonov, Alving et al. 1997). Initially it was<br />

suggested that measurements should only be performed with an ambient NO less than 40ppb'<br />

with improved standardisation and more sensitive and rapidly responding analysers this is<br />

now too high. <strong>The</strong> 2005 recommendation is that the ambient NO be less than 5ppb and/or that<br />

subjects inhale NO free air while being tested. <strong>The</strong> newer NO analysers including the smaller'<br />

more transportable units such as the MINO@ (Aerocrine AB, Solna, Sweden) or z-700 No<br />

meter @asibi Environmental Corporation, Glendale, California, United States <strong>of</strong> America)<br />

have a scrubbing facility within the inhalation limb. This may be more important for reservoir<br />

collections during tidal breathing where an increased amount <strong>of</strong> ambient NO is exhaled and<br />

thus collected. In our experiments we elected to measure only when the NO in ambient air<br />

was less than 10ppb. However on many days this precluded measurement which delayed the<br />

experiments. Unlike other researchers, we found exhalation from a high NO concentration<br />

compared to exhalation from a low NO concentration resulted in a drop in the overall NO<br />

level as discussed in Chapter 7. On review now, it may have been because we were waiting<br />

for a plateau to develop with a drop from the high ambient NO reading and it took some time<br />

2r3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!