01.12.2012 Views

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a mean value <strong>of</strong> 32.9 seconds for the direct method (SD 1 !.4, range 15'8-65'8s) and a mean<br />

value <strong>of</strong> 28.6 seconds for the t-piece method (SD 7.8, range 14'8-48s)' <strong>The</strong> mouthpiece was<br />

standardised at 4.OmmHg in both techniques and the flow to 225mlslmin in the t-piece<br />

method by voluntary control using visual feedback to the children. <strong>The</strong>re was still some<br />

variation around this depending on how successful the children were at maintaining the<br />

pressure and flow as requested during a slow exhalation from total lung capacity which is<br />

shown in Table 8.1.<br />

Table 8.1: Coefficients <strong>of</strong> variation <strong>of</strong> peak NO, peak COzand mouth pressure measurements made<br />

by both the direct and t-piece systems, and <strong>of</strong> flow made by the t-piece system<br />

Direct method:<br />

Peak NO in PPb<br />

CQ2"/" totalgases<br />

T-piece method:<br />

Peak NO in pPb<br />

CO2"/o totalgases<br />

Mouth pressure in<br />

Flow in mls/min<br />

comparisons were made within this group <strong>of</strong> children <strong>of</strong> other factors that could result in<br />

ainvay inflammation which may give higher results <strong>of</strong> exhaled No. Regarding a personal<br />

history <strong>of</strong> atopy; the question sent home to the parents was:<br />

Has he/she ever had eczema?<br />

Has he/she ever had hay fever?<br />

25.9<br />

0.44<br />

22.4<br />

29.9<br />

0.44<br />

12.5<br />

14<br />

Yes/l'{o<br />

Yes/No<br />

Does he/she have eczemalha.yfever now? YesA'{o<br />

2.6-67.4<br />

0.41-0.81<br />

4.5-57.0<br />

0.5-65<br />

0.41-0.81<br />

2.9-36.1<br />

1.8-30.3<br />

<strong>The</strong>re were eleven children that had a personal past or current history <strong>of</strong> allergic rhinitis<br />

compared to 28 children who did not. At the time <strong>of</strong> testing none had current nasal symptoms<br />

but three did have current eczema and were using appropriate topical creams including<br />

hydrocortisone cream. <strong>The</strong>re was no significant difference in the exhaled No levels in the<br />

atopic children at 34.5ppb (sD 11.8) compared to non-atopic children at 45'6ppb (sD 38'5)<br />

via the direct method or via the t-piece method measured at29'6ppb (SD 24) versus 24'8ppb<br />

(SD 26.2) respectively. We also looked at whether family history <strong>of</strong> atopy had any effect on<br />

the exhaled No levels in the children. <strong>The</strong> question sent home to the families was:<br />

185

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!