01.12.2012 Views

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the NO concentrations taken pre and post the water experiment (p=0.095). <strong>The</strong>re was<br />

difference in the COz or duration <strong>of</strong> expiration across the three sets <strong>of</strong> exhalations made.<br />

Figure 7.9: <strong>The</strong> etfect <strong>of</strong> consuming water on the subsequent exhaled NO levels measured<br />

.o 2fi<br />

e<br />

Eo 't<br />

a lso<br />

o = 100<br />

E Ps0<br />

x<br />

ttJ<br />

0<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> peak exhaled NO levels with the exhalation performed in a standard manner pre and<br />

post a set <strong>of</strong> exhalations done where the consumption <strong>of</strong> either hot (in red) or cold (in black) took<br />

place just prior to each exhalation. Each point is a mean <strong>of</strong> five exhalations.<br />

7.7 Discussion: which measurement factors alter nitric oxide levels?<br />

<strong>The</strong> methodological experiments described in Chapter 6 and 7 demonstrated that the<br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> NO in exhaled air was feasible. A number <strong>of</strong> cross-sectional studies looking<br />

at exhaled NO concentrations in different subject groups had been reported. <strong>The</strong> findings<br />

within each research team had been consistent, but the absolute levels <strong>of</strong> NO reported by the<br />

investigators in similar subject $oups were very different. All these investigators used NO<br />

chemiluminescence analysers which, although developed by different companies, had similar<br />

sensitivities and they stated that regular calibration was being performed. <strong>The</strong> study groups<br />

were similar. For example, the results in healthy control subjects through the 1990s were<br />

reported with means <strong>of</strong> 3.25ppb, 4.7Sppb and 100.25ppb under different conditions @ersson,<br />

Wiklund et al. 1993), 4.7ppb (Massaro, Mehta et al. 1996),6.2ppb (Massaro, Gaston et al.<br />

1995), 8.lppb (Borland, Cox et al. 1993), 8.4ppb @ersson, Zetterstrom et al. 1994), 8.6ppb<br />

(Trolin, Anden et al. 1994), 9ppb (Alving, Weitzberg et al. 1993), 11.lppb (Martin, Bryden et<br />

al. 1996), l6ppb (Schedin, Frostell et al. 1995), l9ppb and 2lppb (Schilling, Holzer et al.<br />

1994),22ppb (Kimberly, Nejadnik et al. 1996), 26.3ppb (Iwamoto, Pendergast et al. 1994),<br />

34ppb (Jilma, Kastner et al. 1996),42ppb (Gerlach, Rossaint et al. 1994), 51 NO g-r 6Morris,<br />

Sooranna et al. 1996), 70ppb and 75ppb (Kharitonov, Logan-Sinclair et al. 1994), 80.2ppb<br />

(Kharitonov, Yates et al. 1994), 88ppb (Kharitonov, Robbins et al. 1995), 89ppb (Kharitonov,<br />

Wells et al. 1995) and l05.5ppb (Robbins, Floreani et al. 1996). Similar ranges in NO results<br />

t70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!