01.12.2012 Views

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

significantly between research groups, partly because <strong>of</strong> different techniques utilised. I-anz et<br />

al reported a mean exhaled NO <strong>of</strong> 14ppb (+/- 2ppb) in seven children with single exhalations<br />

from total lung capacity into a reservoir bag that was then fed through the NO analyser (lanz,<br />

Irung et al. 1997). <strong>The</strong>y also showed that there was no difference in the NO levels when re-<br />

measured five days later (Lanz, I-eung et al. 1997). Using a similar method <strong>of</strong> slow exhalation<br />

into a reservoir and then put through the analyser, Nelson et al reported a much lower mean<br />

exhaled NO <strong>of</strong> 5.05ppb (+/- 0.4ppb) in 2I children (Nelson, Sears et al. 1997). Baraldi et al<br />

showed that NO reached a steady plateau when measured during tidal breathing after one to<br />

two minutes and reported mean levels <strong>of</strong> 5.4ppb in 16 children (Baraldi, Azzolin et ^1. 1997).<br />

Lundberg et al also measured plateau oral exhaled NO levels with tidal breathing and reached<br />

a similar figure <strong>of</strong> 4.8ppb (SD 1.1) in 19 children (Lundberg, Nordvall et al. 1996). Balfour-<br />

Lynn et al measured NO from single exhalations taking the point <strong>of</strong> NO when the end tidal<br />

COz reached a plateau in an attempt to compare alveolar levels for both oral and nasal<br />

measurement. <strong>The</strong> 57 control children had a mean oral exhaled NO <strong>of</strong> 4.8 ppb (range l.l to<br />

23ppb), and mean nasal NO <strong>of</strong> 1024 ppb (range 158 - 2502ppb) @alfour-Lynn, Laverty et al.<br />

1996). Two studies measured controls across wide age ranges that incorporated an unknown<br />

number <strong>of</strong> children. Dotch et al measured exhaled NO from single exhalations although the<br />

response time <strong>of</strong> the analyser was not fast enough at 25 seconds for a 9OVo response rate to<br />

measure one breath, so the subject was required to exhale four to five times into the analyser<br />

via mouth inhalation and with nose clips in place. In 68 controls aged four to 34 years the<br />

mean NO result was 3.0 ppb (+l-2.Sppb) by these single exhalations, with a minute ventilation<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> NO <strong>of</strong> 25 ppb (+l- 27 ppb) and direct nasal NO level <strong>of</strong> 96 ppb (+l- 47 ppb)<br />

@otsch, Demirakca et al. 1996).<br />

In another study, Grasemann measured NO by single exhalations to an analyser that had a 10<br />

second response time. <strong>The</strong> mean exhaled NO level in 30 control subjects aged six to 37 years<br />

was 9.1 ppb (+/- 3.6ppb). Lundberg et al measured the plateau NO signal by continuous<br />

sampling from oral exhalation or nasal exhalation or by direct nasal measurement in 19<br />

children. <strong>The</strong> mean oral level was 4.8ppb (SD 1.1), the mean nasal level was 2lppb (SD 9.1)<br />

and the mean directly measured nasal level was 239ppb (SD 20) (Lundberg, Nordvall et al.<br />

1996). Most <strong>of</strong> these researchers therefore reported absolute levels <strong>of</strong> exhaled NO that were<br />

less than the results that I have reported from my studies. However I had elected to use single<br />

exhalations measured immediately by the analysers, while these others used tidal breathing or<br />

plateau measurements with or without a reservoir technique over several breaths.<br />

190

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!