01.12.2012 Views

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

levels between the asthmatics with allergic rhinitis at 252ppb (SD 20) compared to those<br />

wirhout rhinitis at 256ppb (SD 26) (Lundberg, Nordvall et al. 1gg6). In sixteen children with<br />

acute maxillary sinusitis the mean nasal concentration was 70 ppb (+l S.7ppb) increased to<br />

220ppb (+/- 15ppb) after oral antibiotic therapy. In comparison nine children with upper<br />

respiratory tract infections but not thought to have sinusitis had mean nasal NO levels <strong>of</strong><br />

249ppb (+t- 32ppb), which did not change after oral antibiotic treatment (Baraldi, Azzolin et<br />

al. t997).<br />

In studies comparing children with asthma and children with CF, Lundberg et al also<br />

compared the plateau oral exhaled NO levels demonstrating no difference between 19 control<br />

children and eight children with cF at a mean <strong>of</strong> 4.8ppb (sD 1.2) and 5'8ppb (SD 0'8)<br />

respectively. However there was a significant increase in the 36 children with asthma to<br />

l3.gppb (SD 2.5). <strong>The</strong>se higher levels were seen in the asthmatic children despite their taking<br />

a range <strong>of</strong> medication with twelve on low dose IHCS (defined as 0-100pgs budesonide or<br />

equivalent per day), 16 on moderate doses <strong>of</strong> IHCS (defined as 200-400pgs budesonide or<br />

equivalent per day) and eight on high doses <strong>of</strong> IHCS (defined as 600-800pgs budesonide or<br />

equivalent per day). I note there appear to be gaps in these ranges i.e. 100-200pgs and 400-<br />

600pgs which are not discussed but it is likely that there was no child on treatment in these<br />

ranges which would have required odd dosing regimes. With nasal exhalation sampling, there<br />

was no difference between the control group or this asthmatic group (recalling that all were on<br />

IHCS therapy) at 21ppb (SD 9.1) versus 27ppb (SD 2.6), although a possible trend was noted<br />

<strong>of</strong> a decreasing NO when on the higher steroid doses. <strong>The</strong>re was also no difference in these<br />

two groups when having direct nasal sampling (via a nasal olive) with the controls measured<br />

at 239ppb (SD 20) and the collective asthmatic group measured at 254ppb (SD 17)' However<br />

in both the nasal measurements those that were able to perform the technique from the group<br />

<strong>of</strong> children with cF showed significantly lower levels with their nasal breathing giving levels<br />

between 9-l5ppb and their nasal direct sampling giving levels between 40-105ppb (Lundberg'<br />

Nordvall et al. 1996). In 68 controls, 90 asthmatics and 67 subjects with CF with a collective<br />

age range from four to 34 years, Dotsch et al used a slowly responding analyser measuring a<br />

series <strong>of</strong> single exhalations and showed a correlation between exhaled NO levels and the<br />

ambient NO concentration. <strong>The</strong>y then reported results between the three groups studied only<br />

in the subjects that were measured during days <strong>of</strong> zero ambient No concentration (Dotsch,<br />

Demirakca et al. 1996). <strong>The</strong> mean level <strong>of</strong> exhaled NO in 30 asthmatics aged four to fourteen<br />

years was 8.0ppb (+/- 6.lppb), significantly higher than in 37 controls aged four to 34 years at<br />

3.0ppb (+l 2.5ppb). Twenty three patients with CF aged five to 32 years tended to have a<br />

t99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!