01.12.2012 Views

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

experienced staff to undertake the procedure, and laboratory staff to process samples within a<br />

short time frame. It also represents a significant time commitment - even in the most<br />

experienced hands and a sample taken in the shortest time, the minimum time to from start to<br />

getting a result for one sample is estimated to be 100 minutes (Holz, Kips et al. 2000). Both<br />

blood and urine sampling have been found to be less useful, probably because the site <strong>of</strong><br />

measurement is distant from the site <strong>of</strong> interest, the lung. In addition, apart from obtaining<br />

urine samples, the other sampling procedures all require a hospital or clinical setting.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se studies started to come about at the same time as my own research commenced. In view<br />

<strong>of</strong> all these difficulties a simpler, direct, non-invasive technique for measuring airway<br />

inflammation was sought, that could be achieved easily by children, and could be repeated<br />

regularly with time. Because measurement <strong>of</strong> lung function is a common procedure in<br />

children and does not involve collecting specimens and there is no anaesthesia or needles, the<br />

result is instant -<br />

a test analogous to this would seem ideal.<br />

In 1987 came the announcement that a gaseous molecule, NO, was responsible for acting as<br />

both a widespread physiological mediator and was also involved in host defense (Hibbs,<br />

Taintor et al. 1987; Ignarro, Buga et al. 1987 Khan and Furchgott 1987). This resulted in an<br />

explosion <strong>of</strong> research in the early 1990s identifying both NO and the enzymes that produced it<br />

- the nitric oxide synthases (NOS) in all biological systems. NO was shown to play a major<br />

role in host defense and inflammation within the lung as in other systems. Toward the end <strong>of</strong><br />

1995,I also went to a one day seminar on NO at the Royal Society <strong>of</strong> Medicine in I-ondon to<br />

hear Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Salvador Moncada, one <strong>of</strong> the major early researchers into NO in the<br />

cardiovascular system, talk. I was struck by the importance <strong>of</strong> this one tiny molecule, and the<br />

unfolding story with more to come. This seemed like a great opportunity to further explore the<br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> NO as a potential marker for airway inflammation; however there were a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> hurdles to overcome. Measuring NO was going to be difficult given its gaseous,<br />

short lived and highly reactive nature. As well there was the difficulty <strong>of</strong> measuring levels in<br />

exhaled air from human subjects, especially in children.<br />

This research was conducted at the Royal Brompton Hospital in London from the mid 1990s.<br />

On returning to New Zealand, it was acceptable to submit this research over time as a thesis.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the findings within this thesis are now well-known, but were unknown, new and<br />

exciting when first demonstrated. <strong>The</strong> findings contributed to the knowledge as to what<br />

technical aspects were important in the measurement <strong>of</strong> NO, to the standardising <strong>of</strong> protocols<br />

for measurement, and to what were important capabilities to be developed for the newer NO<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!