01.12.2012 Views

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

washout characteristics were noted to vary from breath to breath (Hall, Reinmann et al.2002)'<br />

This group then divided the exhalation to assess whether one part <strong>of</strong> the expiratory signal<br />

exhibited less intra-subject variability and therefore could potentially be the most<br />

discriminatory. Firstly, based on the exhalation pattern <strong>of</strong> COz, they looked at the NO levels<br />

which corresponded to phase one (from the convective airways), phase two (progressive<br />

washout <strong>of</strong> the airways with alveolar gas) and phase three (alveolar compartment when<br />

exhaled COz is high). Secondly, they divided the tidal volume into four quarters <strong>of</strong> exhalation<br />

time. <strong>The</strong> most variable periods were phase one, and the first and fourth quarters'<br />

Correspondingly, the second and third quarter time periods had about the same variability as<br />

phase two, which was the best, followed by phase three. <strong>The</strong> group concluded that in the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> COz measurement as a guide, the reported result should come from the second and<br />

third quarter <strong>of</strong> the exhalation (Hall, Reinmann et al' 2002)'<br />

Similar to studies in other age groups, flow dependency <strong>of</strong> exhaled NO levels have been<br />

demonstrated in infants by both methods. This was demonstrated in the original single breath<br />

study comparing a second flow <strong>of</strong> 100mls/s as well as the standard <strong>of</strong> 5omls/s in three<br />

subjects showing a significant difference in NO results (Wildhaber, Hall et al' 1999)'<br />

Similarly, low to higher NO levels were obtained at expiratory flows <strong>of</strong> 50, 25 and l5mls/s in<br />

five full term healthy infants (Martinez, Weist et al. 2003). Breath-by-breath analysis for tidal<br />

breathing also showed that higher expiratory flow rates were associated with lower exhaled<br />

NO levels (Franklin, Turner et a:.2004). In a large prospective healthy birth cohort <strong>of</strong> 98<br />

infants the tidal breathing parameters <strong>of</strong> flow, breathing rate and expiratory time, measured at<br />

age one month, all led to varying exhaled NO results. This group also came to the conclusion<br />

that the third expiratory quartile <strong>of</strong> exhaled NO during tidal breathing was the most<br />

reproducible (Frey, Kuehni et al.2004). In a direct comparison in 7l infants, the peak flow<br />

was 128mls/s during tidal breathing and llmls/s during single breath measurements<br />

(Franklin, Turner et al. 2004). This may also explain why single breath results versus tidal<br />

breathing results usually have higher absolute exhaled No levels.<br />

Other parameters have been seen to affect NO levels in infancy. Measurements in twelve<br />

infants showed that ambient NO concentrations as low as 5-10 ppb compared to the inhalation<br />

<strong>of</strong> NO free air resulted in an increase exhaled level (Franklin, Turner et al. 2004).In the 98<br />

infants at one month, a gender difference, with boys having higher levels at 17 '7ppb than girls<br />

at 14.6ppb, was noted. This remained significant after adjusting for weight and minute<br />

ventilation (Frey, Kuehni et al.2004). In thirteen preterm infants the exhaled NO was almost<br />

absent and gradually increased over the first 48 hours, while in eleven term infants there was a<br />

255

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!