01.12.2012 Views

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

View - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

al found levels <strong>of</strong> 10.3ppb compared to controls at 8.4ppb, Massaro et al found levels <strong>of</strong><br />

13.2ppb compared to controls at 4.7ppb, and Robbins et al found levels <strong>of</strong> 174ppb compared<br />

to controls <strong>of</strong> 105.5ppb (Kharitonov, Yates et al. 1994; Persson, Zetterstrom et al. 1994;<br />

Massaro, Mehta et al. 1996; Robbins, Floreani et al. 1996). Alving et al demonstrated no<br />

overlap between their control group with a range <strong>of</strong> 5-16ppb and their asthmatic group who<br />

had a range measured at 2I-3Ippb (Alving, Weitzberg et al. 1993). Massaro demonstrated<br />

that the NO levels were even higher during a period <strong>of</strong> acute asthma in seven patients<br />

requiring emergency department treatment with a reduction <strong>of</strong> NO beginning by 48 hours<br />

(Massaro, Gaston et al. 1995) and Kharitinov et al showed a reduction over three weeks in<br />

eleven asthmatic patients who commenced on IHCS therapy. However, as can be seen above,<br />

the absolute mean concentrations <strong>of</strong> exhaled NO obtained by these separate workers in similar<br />

patient groups and normal subjects using similar techniques appeared so disparate as to be<br />

confusing.<br />

In addition, the regional source <strong>of</strong> NO within the respiratory tract was debated. Initially<br />

Borland et al suggested that the NO measured in exhaled air from a single full exhalation and<br />

during tidal breathing was <strong>of</strong> alveolar origin like COz (Borland, Cox et al. 1993). Persson et al<br />

then suggested that NO was formed preferentially in the small airways such as the terminal<br />

and respiratory bronchioles (Persson, Wiklund et al. 1993). By comparing the concentrations<br />

<strong>of</strong> NO exhaled during tidal breathing through either nose or mouth, Alving et al suggested<br />

that the major contribution came from the nasal space with a minor addition from the lower<br />

airways (Alving, Weitzberg et al. 1993). Lundberg et al demonstrated a decreasing<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> exhaled NO when sampling progressively down the respiratory tract at the<br />

nose, mouth and, in four tracheotomised patients, below the vocal cords (Lundberg, Farkas-<br />

Szallasi et al. 1995).<br />

Another goup also looked at exhaled concentrations <strong>of</strong> NO in five adults with tracheostomy<br />

during spontaneous breathing where oral NO concentrations were 9 - 25.7ppb while via the<br />

tracheostomy this dropped to l.l - 6.5ppb. Eleven patients admitted for minor abdominal<br />

surgery had similar decreases in NO levels measured under anaesthesia from nasal (mean<br />

54ppb), oral (mean l3ppb) and following intubation (mean 1.3ppb, which was close to the<br />

lower detection limit <strong>of</strong> their analyser). Seven patients intubated and ventilated in intensive<br />

care with multiple diagnoses all had NO concentration levels close to the detection limit <strong>of</strong> the<br />

analyser (range <strong>of</strong> 0.0 - 1.3ppb) (Schedin, Frostell et al. 1995). By isolating the nasal passages<br />

from the rest <strong>of</strong> the respiratory tract with voluntary closure <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>of</strong>t palate, Kimberly et al<br />

showed the release <strong>of</strong> NO in the nasal passages was approximately seven times greater than<br />

126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!