12.07.2015 Views

Statement of Assets and Liabilities for last Five Years and Latest ...

Statement of Assets and Liabilities for last Five Years and Latest ...

Statement of Assets and Liabilities for last Five Years and Latest ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Given IRFC's modest accruals to net worth, CRISIL believes that Gol will continue toinfuse equity capital at regular intervals to enable IRFC to maintain adequate gearing,while meeting the growing funding requirements <strong>of</strong> IR, over the medium term.IRFC also has very strong asset quality, as it lends predominantly to IR, which is asovereign entity. Till date, IRFC has had zero non-per<strong>for</strong>ming assets (NPAs).Furthermore, IRFC is a public financial institution under Section 4A <strong>of</strong> the Con1paniesAct <strong>of</strong> 1956, <strong>and</strong> has been exempted from Reserve Bank <strong>of</strong> India's (RBI's) guidelines <strong>for</strong>systemically important non-deposit taking non-banking financial companies (NBFC­ND-SI) regarding compliance with single/ group exposure norms to the extent that the-expesures-are--tewards-IR-fGef.()Adequate resource pr<strong>of</strong>ileIRFC's ability to raise long-term funds at competitive rates is underpinned by its accessto a diversified pool <strong>of</strong> wholesale investors, including banks, mutual funds, pension <strong>and</strong>gratuity funds, insurance companies, as well as external commercial borrowings (ECBs).Its borrowing costs at around -8.2 per cent in 2011-12 (refers to financial year, April! toMarch 31) was similar to that in 2010-11, <strong>and</strong> compares well with that <strong>of</strong> its peers. IRFChas been permitted to raise funds through tax-free bonds which also support its resourcepr<strong>of</strong>ile.CRISIL believes that IRFC will maintain adequate resource pr<strong>of</strong>ile driven by its strategicimportance, <strong>and</strong> access to a diverse source <strong>of</strong> long-term investors.The above-mentioned rating strengths are parHally <strong>of</strong>fset by IRFC's followingweakness:Average earnings pr<strong>of</strong>ileIRFC' s earnings pr<strong>of</strong>ile is marked by moderate interest spreads <strong>and</strong> low operatingexpenses. As IRFC is the funding vehicle <strong>for</strong> IR, enhancing IRFC' s pr<strong>of</strong>itability is not theprimary objective. IRFC' s interest spreads ate preserved by ensuring a mark-up over itscosts <strong>of</strong> borrowings. Furthermore, the lease agreements with IR protect IRFC' s netinterest margins, <strong>and</strong> transfer the interest <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>eign exchange risks on its borrowingsto IR. Consequently, IRFC' s net pt<strong>of</strong>itability marginl (NPM; on a yearly average basis)has remained stable at around 0.7 per cent over the past three yeats. However, the costplus model results in a lower NPM compared to other infrastructure financingcompanies.CRISIL believes that while IRFC' s earnings pr<strong>of</strong>ile is not expected to improvesignificantly over the medium term, IR will ensure that the company remains pr<strong>of</strong>itable<strong>and</strong> generates adequate returns on its assets (RoA; 0.9 per cent'in 2011-12).1 NPM is defined as (Yield on funds deployed)- (Average borrowing costs)- (Operating expense ratio)+(Fee income levels)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!