Applied numerical modeling of saturated / unsaturated flow and ...
Applied numerical modeling of saturated / unsaturated flow and ...
Applied numerical modeling of saturated / unsaturated flow and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(1995) yields a “hybrid” rate constant between a bulk attenuation <strong>and</strong> a pure biodegradation rate constant, as it accounts<br />
for longitudinal dispersion whereas the effects <strong>of</strong> transverse dispersion are still reflected in the rate constant. A pure<br />
biodegradation rate constant can be estimated analytically by normalizing contaminant concentrations to concentrations<br />
<strong>of</strong> a recalcitrant tracer, if such a compound is emitted from the same source zone as the contaminant <strong>of</strong> concern<br />
(Wiedemeier et al. 1996). If this is not the case, an approach <strong>of</strong> Zhang <strong>and</strong> Heathcote (2003) may be used, in which the<br />
Buscheck <strong>and</strong> Alcantar (1995) method is extended to account for dispersion in two or three dimensions. Pure<br />
biodegradation rate constants exclusive <strong>of</strong> dispersion or other attenuation processes (<strong>and</strong> only those) may be used in<br />
contaminant transport models for prognoses <strong>of</strong> plume trends. It is important to note that these center line based rate<br />
constant estimation approaches are only applicable to contaminant plumes that have reached steady state conditions, as<br />
for still exp<strong>and</strong>ing plumes the rate constant would be overestimated.<br />
Although it is known, that biodegradation rate estimates obtained from an investigation <strong>of</strong> the plume center line are<br />
subject to substantial uncertainty, this strategy is frequently used in practice. Even in homogeneous aquifers vertical <strong>and</strong><br />
horizontal transverse dispersion can produce center line concentration pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> recalcitrant compounds that could be<br />
mistaken as following from first order degradation (McNab Jr. <strong>and</strong> Dooher 1998). Moreover, the plume axis may easily<br />
be missed by monitoring wells when the inferred ground water <strong>flow</strong> direction is incorrect, changes over time due to<br />
transient <strong>flow</strong> behavior or when the contaminant plume shows large scale me<strong>and</strong>ering due to aquifer heterogeneity<br />
(Newell et al. 2002; Wilson et al. 2004). Therefore, biodegradation rate constants obtained from such field data should be<br />
taken as rough estimates only (Chapelle et al. 2003). As first order rates calculated from center line data include all<br />
effects <strong>and</strong> processes that lower local contaminant concentrations, the precarious result <strong>of</strong> the different sources <strong>of</strong><br />
uncertainty is that the degradation potential may be severely overestimated (Rittmann 2004), causing underestimation <strong>of</strong><br />
plume length <strong>and</strong> contaminant mass as well as a too optimistic prognosis <strong>of</strong> down gradient concentrations <strong>and</strong> exposure<br />
levels. These aspects were recently studied in-depth by Bauer et al. (2006a) <strong>and</strong> Beyer et al. (2006) by means <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>numerical</strong> experiments in two-dimensional synthetic heterogeneous contaminated aquifers. The <strong>numerical</strong> experiments<br />
were based on coarse monitoring networks with 6 to 8 wells, which were all placed along an inferred plume center line.<br />
In reality, however, monitoring networks typically are designed to suit multiple <strong>and</strong> sometimes conflicting requirements<br />
<strong>and</strong> objectives, which may also change with time, depending on the stage <strong>of</strong> the site investigation. Objectives in this<br />
context are the detection <strong>of</strong> ground water contamination (e.g. Storck et al. 1997), site characterization <strong>and</strong> spatial<br />
delineation <strong>of</strong> the contamination (e.g. McGrath <strong>and</strong> Pinder 2003) or the long term monitoring <strong>of</strong> the plume behavior (e.g.<br />
Wu et al. 2006). These aims require spatially more extensive monitoring networks with larger numbers <strong>of</strong> wells<br />
compared to the relatively simple center line well configurations necessary to estimate a degradation rate constant.<br />
Recently, Stenback et al. (2004) demonstrated that additional <strong>of</strong>f center line measurements can be incorporated in the<br />
estimation <strong>of</strong> the degradation rate, when a two-dimensional analytical transport model is fitted to contaminant<br />
concentrations <strong>of</strong> all monitoring wells <strong>of</strong> an extensive monitoring network downgradient from the source. In a field<br />
application example Stenback et al. (2004) showed, that accounting for the additional information on contaminant<br />
concentrations <strong>and</strong> distribution significantly reduced rate constant estimates obtained from the conventional center line<br />
approach to about 50 %, pointing out the well known problem <strong>of</strong> rate constant overestimation with the 1D center line<br />
method.<br />
This paper therefore studies the performance <strong>of</strong> several rate constant estimation approaches based on center line<br />
investigation data for sites with extensive monitoring networks <strong>and</strong> compares the results to the two-dimensional approach<br />
<strong>of</strong> Stenback et al. (2004). Adopting the terminology <strong>of</strong> Newell et al. (2002) the types <strong>of</strong> degradation rate constants<br />
regarded here comprise bulk attenuation, biodegradation <strong>and</strong> “hybrid” rate constants. Point decay rates are not addressed<br />
in this paper. Both strategies for rate constant estimation, i.e. the investigation <strong>of</strong> the plume center line <strong>and</strong> the approach<br />
<strong>of</strong> Stenback et al. (2004), are applied to a set <strong>of</strong> synthetic sites with extensive monitoring networks, which were<br />
independently designed <strong>and</strong> installed by individual test persons engaged in hydrogeological research <strong>and</strong> consulting. The<br />
networks were installed for a general characterization <strong>and</strong> quantification <strong>of</strong> the contaminant plume (Chen et al. 2005;<br />
Bauer et al. 2006b), <strong>and</strong> are used here as a basis for degradation rate estimation. Estimated rate constants for both<br />
strategies are compared with regard to magnitude <strong>of</strong> errors <strong>and</strong> variability to draw conclusions on their limitations in<br />
view <strong>of</strong> the monitoring network used. Thereby the studies <strong>of</strong> Bauer et al. (2006a) <strong>and</strong> Beyer et al. (2006) are considerably<br />
extended, as the monitoring networks used in this paper are representative <strong>of</strong> real field situations by using all installed<br />
observation wells, <strong>and</strong> are not restricted to an one-dimensional plume center line. Moreover, this analysis allows an<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> the “human factor” on estimated rate constants resulting from individual notions <strong>of</strong> “sufficient accuracy” in<br />
plume investigation.<br />
Background <strong>and</strong> Scope<br />
This study is based on a set <strong>of</strong> synthetic contaminated two-dimensional aquifers, generated by multiple stochastic<br />
simulations <strong>of</strong> heterogeneous hydraulic conductivity fields <strong>and</strong> subsequent <strong>numerical</strong> simulation <strong>of</strong> contaminant<br />
spreading from a defined source zone in the synthetic aquifers. The evolved virtual plumes were independently<br />
investigated by a number <strong>of</strong> German scientists engaged in hydrogeological <strong>and</strong> environmental research using an<br />
2