60 years after the UN Convention - Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation
60 years after the UN Convention - Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation
60 years after the UN Convention - Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
198 development dialogue december 2008 – revisiting <strong>the</strong> heart of darkness<br />
to join <strong>the</strong> party that was responsible for <strong>the</strong> independence and freedom<br />
of Zimbabwe’ (Sunday Mail, 30/8/1981). One of <strong>the</strong> fi rst harbingers of<br />
Matabeleland’s subsequent fate, this announcement juxtaposed <strong>the</strong> creation<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Fifth Brigade with <strong>the</strong> renewed articulation of an authoritarian<br />
and intolerant nationalism. Quite how ruthlessly <strong>the</strong> two would<br />
operate toge<strong>the</strong>r was soon enough revealed. Starting in Matabeleland<br />
North in January 1983, and eventually expanding to encompass Matabeleland<br />
South <strong>the</strong> following year, a campaign of terror was waged by<br />
<strong>the</strong> North Korean-trained Fifth Brigade against <strong>the</strong> region’s inhabitants.<br />
Largely if not exclusively Shona-speaking in composition (Africa<br />
Confi dential, 3/3/1982, Ndlovu-Gatsheni 2003: 24-25), it was ostensibly<br />
deployed by Mugabe to suppress dissident guerrilla activity in Matabeleland.<br />
This unrest, which <strong>the</strong> Harare government claimed was perpetrated<br />
by forces loyal to Joshua Nkomo’s ZAPU party who were not<br />
prepared to accept <strong>the</strong> result of <strong>the</strong> April 1980 election, was deemed all<br />
<strong>the</strong> more dangerous because of <strong>the</strong> opportunities it provided for proxy<br />
intervention by South Africa. That <strong>the</strong> apar<strong>the</strong>id-era Pretoria regime<br />
armed and controlled bands of so-called ‘Super ZAPU’ insurgents as<br />
part of a wider strategy of destabilising its neighbours would seem to<br />
be beyond dispute (Hanlon 1986; Martin and Johnson 1986 and 1987;<br />
and especially Woods 2007). But it would also appear that <strong>the</strong> scale of<br />
<strong>the</strong> threat posed by dissident activity, whe<strong>the</strong>r internally based or externally<br />
directed, was greatly exaggerated. It was a convenient justifi<br />
cation, cynically used by offi cial spokesmen to turn away criticism<br />
(The Star, 30/3/1983; Catholic Commission for Justice and Peace and<br />
Legal Resources <strong>Foundation</strong> 1997: 27-37). Indeed, <strong>the</strong> Fifth Brigade<br />
was never put up against such armed dissidents as <strong>the</strong>re actually were.<br />
Its energies were devoted entirely to <strong>the</strong> rural civilian population (Africa<br />
Now, 1983; Africa Confi dential, 1984). This single-minded focus, as<br />
<strong>the</strong> journalist and former editor of <strong>the</strong> Bulawayo Chronicle, Geoff rey<br />
Nyarota, later described it, saw ‘an estimated 20,000…innocent civilians…brutally<br />
massacred by <strong>the</strong> time Five Brigade was withdrawn in<br />
1986’ (2006: 135). Probably ‘hundreds of thousands of o<strong>the</strong>rs were tortured,<br />
assaulted or raped or had <strong>the</strong>ir property destroyed’, concluded<br />
<strong>the</strong> Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum (2007: 3). ‘Of <strong>the</strong> people<br />
who died, some were shot where <strong>the</strong>y were found; some were “disappeared”,<br />
<strong>the</strong>n executed and buried or thrown down disused mine<br />
shafts; some were taken to torture camps where some died under torture<br />
or were later executed’.<br />
Individual testimony of <strong>the</strong> tens of thousands of crimes committed<br />
by <strong>the</strong> Fifth Brigade, removed from <strong>the</strong> regular chain of military<br />
command and answerable directly to Mugabe, was harrowing in <strong>the</strong><br />
extreme. As much of this is in <strong>the</strong> public domain and is now well