04.12.2012 Views

60 years after the UN Convention - Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation

60 years after the UN Convention - Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation

60 years after the UN Convention - Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

280 development dialogue december 2008 – revisiting <strong>the</strong> heart of darkness<br />

holocaust without mercy. It was deliberate, it was planned and it was<br />

overseen. But to this day, <strong>the</strong> killers have gone unpunished. 1<br />

Is <strong>the</strong>re some selectivity at work when it comes to remembering and<br />

labelling – Jews yes, Arabs no? That would seem to be true. If it were<br />

not, we would not have to tell <strong>the</strong> Tale of Two Genocides: Congo<br />

and Darfur.<br />

Possibly a quarter of a million people have lost <strong>the</strong>ir lives in Darfur.<br />

The US government screams its head off in denunciation of genocide.<br />

But in <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong> Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC),<br />

as many as 5 million have died since 1994 in overlapping convulsions<br />

of ethnic and state-sponsored massacres – and not a word of reproach<br />

from Washington. A human death toll that approaches <strong>the</strong> scale of <strong>the</strong><br />

Nazis’ annihilation of Jews in World War II, an ongoing holocaust<br />

without a whiff of complaint from <strong>the</strong> Superpower.<br />

Why is mass death <strong>the</strong> cause of indignation and confrontation in Sudan,<br />

while exponentially more massive carnage in Congo unworthy<br />

of mention? The answer is simple: in Sudan, <strong>the</strong> US has a geopolitical<br />

nemesis to confront: Arabs, and <strong>the</strong>ir Chinese business partners. In<br />

<strong>the</strong> Congo, it is US’ allies and European and US’ corporate interests<br />

that benefi t from <strong>the</strong> slaughter. Therefore, despite 5 million skeletons<br />

lying in <strong>the</strong> ground, <strong>the</strong>re is no call to arms from <strong>the</strong> US government.<br />

It is <strong>the</strong>y who set <strong>the</strong> genocidal Congolese machine in motion.<br />

Both holocausts are crimes against humanity, but only <strong>the</strong> smaller<br />

one, Darfur, is a fi t subject for inclusion in <strong>the</strong> US political debate.<br />

During <strong>the</strong> CNN Democratic debate of 3 June 2007, moderator Wolf<br />

Blitzer demanded that <strong>the</strong> candidates raise <strong>the</strong>ir hands if <strong>the</strong>y supported<br />

<strong>the</strong> imposition of a no-fl y zone in Darfur – an act of war<br />

against <strong>the</strong> Khartoum government according to international law.<br />

Only Kucinich and former Senator Mike Gravel declined to endorse<br />

<strong>the</strong> violation of Sudanese sovereignty.<br />

The US Congressional Black Caucus follows <strong>the</strong> same script. They<br />

lobby and demonstrate against <strong>the</strong> Sudanese regime, to <strong>the</strong> applause<br />

of <strong>the</strong> corporate press, but <strong>the</strong>y never say a word, as a body, about <strong>the</strong><br />

carnage in Congo. It is a taboo subject, too close to ‘vital American<br />

interests’. But <strong>the</strong> Sudanese confl ict is fair game.<br />

1 Karkar, Sonja (2007), ‘Sabra and Shatila: On Massacres, Atrocities and Holocausts’,<br />

JUST Commentary, vol. 7, no. 10 (October). Karkar is <strong>the</strong> president of Women for<br />

Palestine.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!