60 years after the UN Convention - Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation
60 years after the UN Convention - Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation
60 years after the UN Convention - Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
280 development dialogue december 2008 – revisiting <strong>the</strong> heart of darkness<br />
holocaust without mercy. It was deliberate, it was planned and it was<br />
overseen. But to this day, <strong>the</strong> killers have gone unpunished. 1<br />
Is <strong>the</strong>re some selectivity at work when it comes to remembering and<br />
labelling – Jews yes, Arabs no? That would seem to be true. If it were<br />
not, we would not have to tell <strong>the</strong> Tale of Two Genocides: Congo<br />
and Darfur.<br />
Possibly a quarter of a million people have lost <strong>the</strong>ir lives in Darfur.<br />
The US government screams its head off in denunciation of genocide.<br />
But in <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong> Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC),<br />
as many as 5 million have died since 1994 in overlapping convulsions<br />
of ethnic and state-sponsored massacres – and not a word of reproach<br />
from Washington. A human death toll that approaches <strong>the</strong> scale of <strong>the</strong><br />
Nazis’ annihilation of Jews in World War II, an ongoing holocaust<br />
without a whiff of complaint from <strong>the</strong> Superpower.<br />
Why is mass death <strong>the</strong> cause of indignation and confrontation in Sudan,<br />
while exponentially more massive carnage in Congo unworthy<br />
of mention? The answer is simple: in Sudan, <strong>the</strong> US has a geopolitical<br />
nemesis to confront: Arabs, and <strong>the</strong>ir Chinese business partners. In<br />
<strong>the</strong> Congo, it is US’ allies and European and US’ corporate interests<br />
that benefi t from <strong>the</strong> slaughter. Therefore, despite 5 million skeletons<br />
lying in <strong>the</strong> ground, <strong>the</strong>re is no call to arms from <strong>the</strong> US government.<br />
It is <strong>the</strong>y who set <strong>the</strong> genocidal Congolese machine in motion.<br />
Both holocausts are crimes against humanity, but only <strong>the</strong> smaller<br />
one, Darfur, is a fi t subject for inclusion in <strong>the</strong> US political debate.<br />
During <strong>the</strong> CNN Democratic debate of 3 June 2007, moderator Wolf<br />
Blitzer demanded that <strong>the</strong> candidates raise <strong>the</strong>ir hands if <strong>the</strong>y supported<br />
<strong>the</strong> imposition of a no-fl y zone in Darfur – an act of war<br />
against <strong>the</strong> Khartoum government according to international law.<br />
Only Kucinich and former Senator Mike Gravel declined to endorse<br />
<strong>the</strong> violation of Sudanese sovereignty.<br />
The US Congressional Black Caucus follows <strong>the</strong> same script. They<br />
lobby and demonstrate against <strong>the</strong> Sudanese regime, to <strong>the</strong> applause<br />
of <strong>the</strong> corporate press, but <strong>the</strong>y never say a word, as a body, about <strong>the</strong><br />
carnage in Congo. It is a taboo subject, too close to ‘vital American<br />
interests’. But <strong>the</strong> Sudanese confl ict is fair game.<br />
1 Karkar, Sonja (2007), ‘Sabra and Shatila: On Massacres, Atrocities and Holocausts’,<br />
JUST Commentary, vol. 7, no. 10 (October). Karkar is <strong>the</strong> president of Women for<br />
Palestine.