01.12.2016 Views

EVALUATION

evaluation_of_the_lcnf_0

evaluation_of_the_lcnf_0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AN INDEPENDENT <strong>EVALUATION</strong> OF THE LCNF<br />

A.2.3 International Funding (Q2.3)<br />

Questions:<br />

What methods of innovation funding are you aware of internationally? How<br />

successful have overseas DNOs been in innovating, please provide examples where<br />

possible?<br />

A.2.3.1 International Innovation Funding<br />

Half of the respondents mentioned Horizon 2020 as the largest innovation fund in Europe.<br />

One respondent expanded to say the fund is nearly 80 billion Euros.<br />

One respondent was aware of some US innovation funding – collaboration takes place<br />

through the Electric Power Research Institute and the Department of Energy also provides<br />

grants.<br />

Another respondent has been involved in projects that actually utilised international<br />

funding. They were involved in an EU funded FP7 project, DISCERN, where the aim was<br />

to learn how to enhance the electricity network by using distributed intelligence. This<br />

project will help validate some of the NTVV project outputs.<br />

The Aberdeen Hydrogen Project utilised three funds – EU (FCJHU), UK Government<br />

(Innovate UK) and funding from the Scottish Government. The final project the response<br />

covered was NINES – which involved providing new heating systems for 230 housing<br />

association properties – this was partly funded by a grant from the European ERDF fund.<br />

This same respondent has found that although their experience with these funds has been<br />

positive, in general EU funded projects tend to be developed in response to a funding call<br />

on a specific topic which is different to the scope of the LCNF. They found the missing<br />

aspect of these sources was a good incentive to transition innovation to business as<br />

usual.<br />

A.2.3.2 Success of International Innovation<br />

One respondent that was aware of the US innovation funding had the example of NV<br />

Energy rolling out nearly 1.4m smart meters for customers residing in Nevada, with<br />

around half of the $280m cost being funded by a grant from the Department of Energy.<br />

This project had a dynamic pricing trial, consumer behavioural trial and provided<br />

operational benefits.<br />

Another respondent has, as part of partnerships, reviewed internationally funded projects,<br />

implementing the learning into their own innovation strategy where possible both to avoid<br />

duplication and deliver value to their customers. They say they have provided statements<br />

of support for academic institutions previously to support their bid for internationally<br />

funded research when they feel it will benefit UK customers.<br />

They are aware of international innovation projects that have brought benefits to the UK<br />

industry, through the learning and new products.<br />

It is of the opinion of another respondent that international DNOs have had innovation<br />

success, and are most successful when they have specific network problems to solve.<br />

They provide the example of the rollout and control of energy storage in the state of<br />

California – this is being driven by the large amount of solar generation and the step<br />

change challenges between generation and demand.<br />

PÖYRY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING<br />

October 2016<br />

713_Poyry_Report_Evaluation_of_the_LCNF_FINAL_Oct_2016_v700.docx<br />

124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!