01.12.2016 Views

EVALUATION

evaluation_of_the_lcnf_0

evaluation_of_the_lcnf_0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AN INDEPENDENT <strong>EVALUATION</strong> OF THE LCNF<br />

Ideas<br />

Three respondents mentioned that their own ideas were implemented into the project.<br />

With three other respondents stating that ideas were developed through discussions with<br />

the DNO, be it at the start or throughout.<br />

Other Contributions<br />

One respondent stated that they worked on developing of the business model, with<br />

another respondent saying that they provided a number of resources throughout the<br />

project.<br />

Another respondent’s contribution was the building, testing and delivering of ANM<br />

systems and supporting tools, knowledge and capabilities. They also mentioned that they<br />

contributed ideas for roll- out, scale up and business adoption to exploit the outcomes of<br />

projects – they believe these topics must be of focus for the success of the innovation<br />

programme.<br />

B.4.3.3 During the Project<br />

A quarter of the respondents spoke positively about their collaboration and regular<br />

communication with the DNOs.<br />

One of these respondents mentioned that they had weekly meetings with the DNO, during<br />

which they reviewed data and results, and adapted the plan as required. Another of them<br />

mentioned the round table discussions they had with the DNO and often with other project<br />

partners, as well as meetings with project partners without the DNO. Working closely with<br />

project partners was mentioned by another respondent. Another of these respondents felt<br />

that the DNO having a senior dedicated engineer capable of giving day to day input into<br />

the PM helped ensure success (they were PM for their projects).<br />

One respondent have been involved in several projects thus have experienced various<br />

different governance styles. They say although in general they have had good<br />

experiences, they believe that a review of innovation project execution could be a good<br />

idea in order to establish good practice in this area. This respondent also said they<br />

believe being flexible to change was important for success<br />

B.4.4<br />

Contributed to Roll Out (Q4.4)<br />

Questions:<br />

How did you contribute to the project roll out?<br />

B.4.4.1 Summary of Responses<br />

For three of the respondents, their projects were not yet at the final roll-out stage so they<br />

could not comment. For the other respondents that answered the question, apart from<br />

one, they all had a reasonable contribution to the project roll out. Only one respondent<br />

stated that they generally are not as involved in the project roll out phase after completion<br />

of the LCNF project.<br />

Project Management<br />

Three respondents stated that they had a project management role or led the project rollout.<br />

PÖYRY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING<br />

October 2016<br />

713_Poyry_Report_Evaluation_of_the_LCNF_FINAL_Oct_2016_v700.docx<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!