01.12.2016 Views

EVALUATION

evaluation_of_the_lcnf_0

evaluation_of_the_lcnf_0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AN INDEPENDENT <strong>EVALUATION</strong> OF THE LCNF<br />

ANNEX B – RESPONSES OF PROJECT PARTNERS<br />

B.1 Success of the LCNF<br />

B.1.1<br />

LCNF Meeting its Objectives Regarding Innovation as Business as usual<br />

(Q1.1)<br />

Questions:<br />

Do you believe that the LCNF has met its objective in incentivising the DNOs to<br />

include innovation as part of their core business?<br />

What justification do you have for your response?<br />

B.1.1.1 Summary of Responses<br />

The general consensus was positive in that over half of the respondents that replied to<br />

this question felt that the LCNF had met the objective. One respondent commented on<br />

the difficulty of convincing DNOs to trial any new concepts previous to the LCNF if the<br />

financial return was not obvious.<br />

The main point that can be taken from the responses to this question is that although the<br />

LCNF has definitely incentivised DNOs to be more innovative, work still needs done to<br />

ensure more projects progress from the trial stage to business as usual.<br />

Some respondents think that the objective been partially met – but it is too early for the full<br />

effects to be realised regarding including innovation as business as usual.<br />

B.1.1.2 Positive Responses<br />

A respondent pointed out a good example one of the projects that has transitioned to<br />

business as usual, referring to UKPN Plug and Play. As a result of the project several<br />

DNOs have been rolling out Active Network Management schemes allowing easier<br />

connection of distributed generation (wind or solar generation) to the network. Two<br />

respondents mention that the LCNF was essential for the DNOs to meet the RIIO-ED1<br />

targets.<br />

Three respondents the degree of learning that has emerged as a result of the LCNF.<br />

Another respondent made a similar point mentioned how useful that disclosure of the<br />

project outcomes, plans and annual progress reports are as sources of information. The<br />

response carries on to say that some DNOs have included the implementation of<br />

successful outcomes from completed projects in their RIIO ED1 plans, with ANM being<br />

one of these.<br />

One respondent stated that there has been a positive culture change – continuing on to<br />

say that there has a been a major shift towards innovation with DNOs now more open to<br />

change where there is a business benefit. This same respondent also believed that having<br />

the regulator drive the LCNF has been beneficial in helping companywide buy-in, focus<br />

and purpose to innovation projects.<br />

B.1.1.3 Challenges to meeting the objective<br />

A reservation of a quarter of respondents was the lack of ideas that have been fully<br />

adopted into business as usual. One of these respondents pointed out that one of the<br />

PÖYRY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING<br />

October 2016<br />

713_Poyry_Report_Evaluation_of_the_LCNF_FINAL_Oct_2016_v700.docx<br />

131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!