01.12.2016 Views

EVALUATION

evaluation_of_the_lcnf_0

evaluation_of_the_lcnf_0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AN INDEPENDENT <strong>EVALUATION</strong> OF THE LCNF<br />

the long wait for receiving the SDRC payment, saying that 2 – 3 years is too long for a<br />

third party to have to wait.<br />

Finally, one respondent observed there to be a lack of acceptance of change. They knew<br />

Ofgem had to ensure money was not being wasted but felt the lack of flexibility and slow<br />

responses created both uncertainty and administration for project partners.<br />

B.3.3.3 Mediums<br />

The Ofgem website was mentioned as an effective communication medium by one<br />

respondent as was the Ofgem Daily Bulletin by another and another respondent had any<br />

important information passed on to them from the associated DNO.<br />

B.3.4<br />

The Application Process (Q3.4)<br />

Questions:<br />

Was the application process straightforward to understand and follow? Was it made<br />

clear to you what should be included within your application?<br />

B.3.4.1 Summary of Responses<br />

The majority of the responses were positive – stating that yes the application process was<br />

straightforward. Only fourteen respondents answered this question, with one of the<br />

remaining two feeling the process was somewhat straightforward, and one feeling it was<br />

not at all straightforward.<br />

B.3.4.2 Forms<br />

A few respondents had reservations regarding the forms – with two of the respondents<br />

commenting that it required a level of detail that were difficult to know so early in the<br />

process.<br />

The respondent that felt the process was not straightforward or clear described the forms<br />

as too prescriptive and jargon-filled, meaning a lot of time was needed to even understand<br />

what was being asked of you.<br />

B.3.4.3 Suggestions<br />

One respondent felt some process aspects could be leaner, for example the financials<br />

that support each project.<br />

B.3.5<br />

Project Selection Process (Q3.5)<br />

Questions:<br />

Was the process for ‘project selection’ clear? Was this clearly communicated?<br />

B.3.5.1 Summary of Responses<br />

The general consensus was that the process was clear, with all respondents agreeing<br />

with this apart from two. Six respondents did not answer this question.<br />

PÖYRY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING<br />

October 2016<br />

713_Poyry_Report_Evaluation_of_the_LCNF_FINAL_Oct_2016_v700.docx<br />

150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!