01.12.2016 Views

EVALUATION

evaluation_of_the_lcnf_0

evaluation_of_the_lcnf_0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AN INDEPENDENT <strong>EVALUATION</strong> OF THE LCNF<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

This study has been commissioned by Ofgem to provide an independent evaluation of the<br />

Low Carbon Networks Fund (LCNF). The project has been undertaken by Pöyry<br />

Management Consulting (UK) Limited (“Pöyry”) and Ricardo Energy and Environment<br />

(“Ricardo”).<br />

1.1 Background to the LCNF<br />

The Low Carbon Networks Fund (LCNF) provided approximately £250m 4 of funding to<br />

projects sponsored by the six Distribution Network Operators (DNO) of Great Britain over<br />

the period 2010-2015. The original objective of the LCNF was to help all DNOs<br />

understand what needs to be done to provide security of supply whilst achieving value for<br />

money – as GB moves to a low carbon economy – and also what role the DNOs could<br />

play in facilitating low carbon and energy saving initiatives to tackle climate change. The<br />

LCNF aimed to help DNOs explore new technologies and to and develop alternative<br />

operating regimes and commercial arrangements.<br />

Prior to the introduction of the LCNF, Ofgem were concerned that the price control<br />

mechanism was encouraging companies to seek short term cost savings to the exclusion<br />

of innovation research which needs a longer term for pay off. In establishing the LCNF<br />

Ofgem was aware of the challenges regulated businesses face in the area of innovation<br />

and aimed to replicate the incentives on unregulated companies to innovate. Innovative<br />

companies which compete in competitive, liberalised, markets usually stand to gain<br />

commercially from innovation. Businesses which are subject to economic regulation –<br />

such as the DNOs – have argued that they may incur the costs of innovation projects if<br />

they fail (as the cost may not be allowed by regulators). In addition they will not be able to<br />

fully capture the benefits of successful innovation as it will be fully or partially clawed back<br />

at subsequent price control reviews.<br />

In April 2013 Ofgem introduced the Revenue = Incentives + Innovation + Outputs (RIIO)<br />

framework for the economic regulation of gas and electricity transmission companies and<br />

for gas distribution companies. The new framework embedded ‘innovation’ into price<br />

control regulation and Ofgem replaced the LCNF with a more comprehensive Innovation<br />

Stimulus package.<br />

In the longer term Ofgem expects the incentives within the RIIO framework to encourage<br />

the DNOs to innovate as part of their normal business practices 5 . Until this happens it is<br />

likely that some form of innovation stimulus will need to continue to exist if the objectives<br />

of the LCNF remain.<br />

1.2 Overview of the LCNF<br />

The LCNF was designed to meet the following objectives:<br />

• incentivising the DNOs to include innovation as part of their core business;<br />

• helping the DNOs to move towards a low carbon business whilst maintaining security<br />

of supply and delivering value for money to customers;<br />

4<br />

5<br />

This is the approved funding by Ofgem and net of the contribution from DNO and project<br />

partners. It includes both Tier 1 and Tier 2 projects.<br />

https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/ofgem-publications/84601/assessmentofinnovationstrategies.pdf<br />

PÖYRY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING<br />

October 2016<br />

713_Poyry_Report_Evaluation_of_the_LCNF_FINAL_Oct_2016_v700.docx<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!