01.12.2016 Views

EVALUATION

evaluation_of_the_lcnf_0

evaluation_of_the_lcnf_0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AN INDEPENDENT <strong>EVALUATION</strong> OF THE LCNF<br />

E.6 Flexible Demand<br />

Demonstrating the Functionality of Automated Demand Response (ADR)<br />

Project Title<br />

Demonstrating the Functionality of Automated Demand Response (ADR)<br />

Tier 1<br />

DNO<br />

SSEPD<br />

Status<br />

Closed<br />

LCNF project funding £260,000<br />

Project objectives • Furnish all data required for a DNO to quantify the benefits of the Automatic Demand Response (ADR) system;<br />

• Drive rapid enrolment by providing required hardware, software, consulting and training to the participating building<br />

owners enrolled on the programme;<br />

• Demonstrate interoperability of systems and by adhering to the standards and open protocols, ensuring long term<br />

lifecycle of assets;<br />

• Demonstrate compliance to various elements pertaining to cyber security;<br />

Assessment<br />

Criteria<br />

Accelerates the development of a low<br />

carbon energy sector<br />

Score Overview of assessment, sources of evidence and comments<br />

(1-5)<br />

4 Assessment:<br />

The project clearly facilitates the connection of low carbon generation or demand. The carbon benefits<br />

not specifically quantified<br />

Evidence:<br />

No carbon savings quantified from the project, some discussion of CO2 impact for the ADR sites. Carbon<br />

savings might come from two routes:<br />

• Reduction of electricity demand at the ADR sites, assuming that demand shifted is not replaced<br />

by higher demand at a different time of day<br />

• That peak demand will probably coincide with the operation of higher carbon generation (e.g.<br />

open cycle GT). So less carbon by virtue of a changed generation mix<br />

Neither of the above are discussed or quantified in the close-out report<br />

References:<br />

• Close down report<br />

PÖYRY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING<br />

October 2016<br />

713_Poyry_Report_Evaluation_of_the_LCNF_FINAL_Oct_2016_v700.docx<br />

282

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!